1. Pajeets code monkeys are not high IQ or creative. Many times, they aren't even competent. More importantly, they have no innate interest in tech or problem solving. They have no spirit of inquiry, which means their interest in STEM is purely on the basis of sustenance as opposed to solving difficult problems or improving the human condition.
2. If pajeets aren't high IQ or creative, what is their appeal? Their appeal lies in being able to make sacrifices in quality of life to work as slaves, putting in exorbitantly high amount of work hours which pleases jewish tech overlords.
3. Whites are the only people who can genuinely produce advancements in technology and take it to new frontiers, but they have a couple of weaknesses. First weakness is that they aren't married to their work like pajeets, and secondly, many of them aren't always willing to sacrifice physical and athletic pursuits in favor of STEMcel wageslavery like pajeets and chinks.
So which of these two sides will win out? Dunno tbh.
2. If pajeets aren't high IQ or creative, what is their appeal? Their appeal lies in being able to make sacrifices in quality of life to work as slaves, putting in exorbitantly high amount of work hours which pleases jewish tech overlords.
3. Whites are the only people who can genuinely produce advancements in technology and take it to new frontiers, but they have a couple of weaknesses. First weakness is that they aren't married to their work like pajeets, and secondly, many of them aren't always willing to sacrifice physical and athletic pursuits in favor of STEMcel wageslavery like pajeets and chinks.
So which of these two sides will win out? Dunno tbh.
