B
The case of “psychological trauma” resulting from the relationship.
A study was published in 2006 regarding “statutory sex crime relationships between juveniles and adults.”
http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV150.pdf
60% of the female adolescents were aged 14 or 15, and a significant amount of the “male offenders” were 21 and above.
Upon reading the study, the first thing a cucktear can point out is that it might debunk my perception that a teen foid might be under more protection with a grown man due to him having more responsibility, since it states that the unwanted pregnancy rate is “3.7 times” higher in those illegal relationships than in teen-teen ones. However if you continue to read the article (section 5.1), you’ll find out that the vast majority of the grown men who currently engage in these relationships have a criminal record and a poor high school performance.
A responsible and wise grown male probably wouldn’t even bother in pursuing a relationship with a foid who’s 15 let’s say, because he knows there’s a risk that he’s gonna get in jail for it. If grown males were allowed to engage in relationships with JBs by the law, then we surely would have different rates.
The article itself is neutral. It offers some great points contrary to the feminists who keep stating that women were “manipulated” into having sex with the adult men, and it also mentions one really important fact regarding the “negative feelings” or trauma that these teen foids might have as a result of fucking grown males.
“Observers have noted that adolescents who are brought into the judicial system as part of these investigations may embellish or change their stories to please the legal authorities, to adhere to societal expectations and/or to avoid embarrassment. Thus, “they inaccurately claim they were afraid, ignorant, or indoctrinated.”
This shows that the so-called trauma could be the result of a societal taboo, and not the sexual experiences themselves.
Another study in 2004, titled, “Online Sex Abuse Cases Not Characterized by Deception, Abduction and Force” (http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2004/08/online-sex-abuse.aspx) shows some interesting things...
The vast majority of the offenders were pretty honest about their age. Only 21% “lied about their sexual motives” and “half of the victims” were described as “being in love with or feeling close bonds with the offenders.”
Those who wrote the article recommended “training for law enforcement since some of the targeted youth may not initially see themselves as victims and may require sensitive interviewing in order to cooperate with investigators.”
In other words, these used up roasties basically want to brainwash teen girls from pursuing older Chads. It’s truly ridiculous. They want to forcefully change their minds about the situation, just because the Chad is above 18 (kek).
The used up roastie Rosalind Prober (who’s apparently an expert on how “evil” these relationships are) admitted in 2007:
"Young people often argue with you that what they're doing is what they want to do and the person on the Internet is really their boyfriend, they weren't sexually exploited and they wanted to raise their shirts and show their breasts over the Internet... It takes a lot of (((debriefing and deprogramming))) to get those children to view themselves as victims, which they truly are, a compliant victim."
JFL at the state of old hags. They want to force JBs to view themselves as victims just because the Chad is above 18.
And furthermore, these old hags never state that teen Chads might be even more manipulative about the situation. If anything, the media is encouraging and manipulating them to be promiscuous at such a young age, but not with older males (JFL).
A common argument used by cucktears is that 18+ women are way more mentally mature. These cucks completely underestimate the power of the adolescent brain.
In his book, “Teen 2.0” Robert Epstein (yes, he’s a kike, but you have to agree he’s right) concluded that:
“After reviewing the relevant scientific literature, interviewing many adults, and consulting with three other psychologists and two psychiatrists with expertise in adult development issues, we concluded that there are fourteen different skill-sets or "competencies" [love, sex, leadership, problem solving, physical abilities, verbal and math, interpersonal skills, responsibility, managing high-risk behaviors, work, education, personal care, self-management, and citizenship] that distinguish adults from non-adults... For three of the competencies--love, leadership and problem solving--we did find statistically significant differences between the mean scores of teens and adults, with adults outscoring the teens. But the absolute differences were small... On two other scales--work and self-management--the differences between the adult scores and teen scores were marginally significant (at the .05 level), again in the adults' favor, but the absolute differences were less than 4 percent. On the other nine scales, we found no significant differences at all between the adult and teen scores... fifty five of the adults in our sample were college graduates--more than double the rate of college graduates in the United States."
In his article, “the myth of the teen brain,” (http://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epst...cientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf?lbisphpreq=1), Epstein states:
“Visual acuity, for example, peaks around the time of puberty. "Incidental memory"—the kind of memory that occurs automatically, without any mnemonic effort, peaks at about age 12 and declines through life... In the 1940s pioneering intelligence researchers J. C. Raven and David Wechsler, relying on radically different kinds of intelligence tests, each showed that raw scores on intelligence tests peak between ages 13 and 15 and decline after that throughout life. Although verbal expertise and some forms of judgment can remain strong throughout life, the extraordinary cognitive abilities of teens, and especially their ability to learn new things rapidly, is beyond question. And whereas brain size is not necessarily a good indication of processing ability, it is notable that recent scanning data collected by Eric Courchesne and his colleagues at the University of California, San Diego, show that brain volume peaks at about age 14.”
Cucks may suggest that older teen girls might be using more effective birth control methods (like pills), but is this fact actually an indication of mental maturity?
Older foids might have more exterior, parental approved or school fed knowledge about this issue.
When you actually analyze the question whether these sexually active high school foids (with grade being variable) actually used ANY form of birth control during their last sexual intercourse, throughout the ages since 1991, you’ll find that there’s barely any difference between freshmen girls and senior ones.
When taking the absolute averages across the years, you’ll find a difference of about 5% between freshmen and senior girls.
https://nccd.cdc.gov/Youthonline/Ap...DP=1&VA=CI&CS=Y&SYID=&EYID=&SC=DEFAULT&SO=ASC
And I know, cucks will question why I did this. Why didn’t I just rely on 2017 data for example? Because the trends aren’t proportional at all and seem to change randomly, regardless of the year.
The available data on HIV screening among high school foids (with grade being variable- sexually OR not sexually active), shows an average increase of about 10% between freshmen and senior foids (since 2005).
But the self reported data on the sexual activity of freshmen girls compared to senior girls shows that the latter was more sexually active by at least 30% if you were to take averages...
This begs the question, if these older teens are simply more mentally mature, then why aren’t they screening themselves (and their boyfriends too) at a similar rate for HIV compared to that of their sexual activity? This correlates with the fact that they use these “effective” birth control methods like pills more often as they age, which suggest that the partner might not be even wearing a condom. There should be a bigger average percentage increase (in relation to the peak in sexual activity) if mental maturity (in regards to wise sexual decisions) is a valid point.
I give credit (regarding the last portion) to a user who already presented the data on the now shutdown blackpill.online website.
A study was published in 2006 regarding “statutory sex crime relationships between juveniles and adults.”
http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV150.pdf
60% of the female adolescents were aged 14 or 15, and a significant amount of the “male offenders” were 21 and above.
Upon reading the study, the first thing a cucktear can point out is that it might debunk my perception that a teen foid might be under more protection with a grown man due to him having more responsibility, since it states that the unwanted pregnancy rate is “3.7 times” higher in those illegal relationships than in teen-teen ones. However if you continue to read the article (section 5.1), you’ll find out that the vast majority of the grown men who currently engage in these relationships have a criminal record and a poor high school performance.
A responsible and wise grown male probably wouldn’t even bother in pursuing a relationship with a foid who’s 15 let’s say, because he knows there’s a risk that he’s gonna get in jail for it. If grown males were allowed to engage in relationships with JBs by the law, then we surely would have different rates.
The article itself is neutral. It offers some great points contrary to the feminists who keep stating that women were “manipulated” into having sex with the adult men, and it also mentions one really important fact regarding the “negative feelings” or trauma that these teen foids might have as a result of fucking grown males.
“Observers have noted that adolescents who are brought into the judicial system as part of these investigations may embellish or change their stories to please the legal authorities, to adhere to societal expectations and/or to avoid embarrassment. Thus, “they inaccurately claim they were afraid, ignorant, or indoctrinated.”
This shows that the so-called trauma could be the result of a societal taboo, and not the sexual experiences themselves.
Another study in 2004, titled, “Online Sex Abuse Cases Not Characterized by Deception, Abduction and Force” (http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2004/08/online-sex-abuse.aspx) shows some interesting things...
The vast majority of the offenders were pretty honest about their age. Only 21% “lied about their sexual motives” and “half of the victims” were described as “being in love with or feeling close bonds with the offenders.”
Those who wrote the article recommended “training for law enforcement since some of the targeted youth may not initially see themselves as victims and may require sensitive interviewing in order to cooperate with investigators.”
In other words, these used up roasties basically want to brainwash teen girls from pursuing older Chads. It’s truly ridiculous. They want to forcefully change their minds about the situation, just because the Chad is above 18 (kek).
The used up roastie Rosalind Prober (who’s apparently an expert on how “evil” these relationships are) admitted in 2007:
"Young people often argue with you that what they're doing is what they want to do and the person on the Internet is really their boyfriend, they weren't sexually exploited and they wanted to raise their shirts and show their breasts over the Internet... It takes a lot of (((debriefing and deprogramming))) to get those children to view themselves as victims, which they truly are, a compliant victim."
JFL at the state of old hags. They want to force JBs to view themselves as victims just because the Chad is above 18.
And furthermore, these old hags never state that teen Chads might be even more manipulative about the situation. If anything, the media is encouraging and manipulating them to be promiscuous at such a young age, but not with older males (JFL).
A common argument used by cucktears is that 18+ women are way more mentally mature. These cucks completely underestimate the power of the adolescent brain.
In his book, “Teen 2.0” Robert Epstein (yes, he’s a kike, but you have to agree he’s right) concluded that:
“After reviewing the relevant scientific literature, interviewing many adults, and consulting with three other psychologists and two psychiatrists with expertise in adult development issues, we concluded that there are fourteen different skill-sets or "competencies" [love, sex, leadership, problem solving, physical abilities, verbal and math, interpersonal skills, responsibility, managing high-risk behaviors, work, education, personal care, self-management, and citizenship] that distinguish adults from non-adults... For three of the competencies--love, leadership and problem solving--we did find statistically significant differences between the mean scores of teens and adults, with adults outscoring the teens. But the absolute differences were small... On two other scales--work and self-management--the differences between the adult scores and teen scores were marginally significant (at the .05 level), again in the adults' favor, but the absolute differences were less than 4 percent. On the other nine scales, we found no significant differences at all between the adult and teen scores... fifty five of the adults in our sample were college graduates--more than double the rate of college graduates in the United States."
In his article, “the myth of the teen brain,” (http://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epst...cientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf?lbisphpreq=1), Epstein states:
“Visual acuity, for example, peaks around the time of puberty. "Incidental memory"—the kind of memory that occurs automatically, without any mnemonic effort, peaks at about age 12 and declines through life... In the 1940s pioneering intelligence researchers J. C. Raven and David Wechsler, relying on radically different kinds of intelligence tests, each showed that raw scores on intelligence tests peak between ages 13 and 15 and decline after that throughout life. Although verbal expertise and some forms of judgment can remain strong throughout life, the extraordinary cognitive abilities of teens, and especially their ability to learn new things rapidly, is beyond question. And whereas brain size is not necessarily a good indication of processing ability, it is notable that recent scanning data collected by Eric Courchesne and his colleagues at the University of California, San Diego, show that brain volume peaks at about age 14.”
Cucks may suggest that older teen girls might be using more effective birth control methods (like pills), but is this fact actually an indication of mental maturity?
Older foids might have more exterior, parental approved or school fed knowledge about this issue.
When you actually analyze the question whether these sexually active high school foids (with grade being variable) actually used ANY form of birth control during their last sexual intercourse, throughout the ages since 1991, you’ll find that there’s barely any difference between freshmen girls and senior ones.
When taking the absolute averages across the years, you’ll find a difference of about 5% between freshmen and senior girls.
https://nccd.cdc.gov/Youthonline/Ap...DP=1&VA=CI&CS=Y&SYID=&EYID=&SC=DEFAULT&SO=ASC
And I know, cucks will question why I did this. Why didn’t I just rely on 2017 data for example? Because the trends aren’t proportional at all and seem to change randomly, regardless of the year.
The available data on HIV screening among high school foids (with grade being variable- sexually OR not sexually active), shows an average increase of about 10% between freshmen and senior foids (since 2005).
But the self reported data on the sexual activity of freshmen girls compared to senior girls shows that the latter was more sexually active by at least 30% if you were to take averages...
This begs the question, if these older teens are simply more mentally mature, then why aren’t they screening themselves (and their boyfriends too) at a similar rate for HIV compared to that of their sexual activity? This correlates with the fact that they use these “effective” birth control methods like pills more often as they age, which suggest that the partner might not be even wearing a condom. There should be a bigger average percentage increase (in relation to the peak in sexual activity) if mental maturity (in regards to wise sexual decisions) is a valid point.
I give credit (regarding the last portion) to a user who already presented the data on the now shutdown blackpill.online website.
Last edited:
