Redpill at it's core is hyperindividualism, social constructionism and existentialism (it's basically a more androcentric, but still gynocentric version of the bluepill).
According to the redpill people are to blame for their actions and their circumstances 100% since they have complete control over their life at all times.
ThERefore female hypERgamy, promiscuity, sneakiness, solipcism, chad worship and hybristophilia are the female's fault, because in theory the female CHOse to be solipcistic, lookist and hypERgamous!
Foids are "evil" in the eyes of incels, but they are not at fault for being that way, and can not be objectively (but still subjectively) judged for their behaviors, since objective morals don't exist according to the blackpill.
Blaming a foid for behaving like a foid is one thing, but pretending she CHOse to be that way is much more hateful.
TLDR: Redpill is blaming wolves for killing sheep.
I agree with most of what you said here and you broke it down well.
However, I totally disagree that the redpill is misogynist. You begin by saying it's gynocentric just like the bluepill is—this is correct and echoes my thoughts exactly, but then you proceed to say that it's more "misogynist" than the blackpill. Could you explain this seeming contradiction?
As I see it, the redpill
does not hold women at fault
at all. When redpillers take the individualist notion you describe "people are to blame for their actions and their circumstances 100% of the time since they have complete control over their life at all times"
they only apply it to men and not to women. By starting off as describing it as gynocentric like the bluepill, this seems to come from the part of you that understands this, but then you incorrectly describe the redpill holding women at fault, which it does not.
Redpillers treat life like a video game where women are like this nebulous candy in the air and you score points by being successful with them. In a video game, you don't complain that it isn't fair or blame the AI, you grind and find ways to succeed or stop trying. This is why bluepilled/feminist types might incorrectly characterize it as objectifying, dehumanizing or misogynist to women—it's
precisely the opposite, this is a world-view that fundamentally cannot criticize women which is why redpilled/PUA types consistently dismiss anything approaching a genuine criticism of women or the premises of society at large, it's just the "way things are" "what are you going to do about it bro?" They regard women in an impersonal manner that makes them immune from criticism, so the weight of the individual approach and the world itself is on the shoulders of men.
Is there any doubt that this image perfectly personifies the redpill mindset, being that they approve of this, encourage it, and fetishize it? For them, this is just a fun challenge, which would be fine except they blanket-apply this logic to all men when it's obvious that there are many men just too unattractive, from bad circumstance, bereft of financial opportunity or disabled to really see success from it.
The odds are clearly stacked against us in every field, but redpillers just act like it's a challenge: if there were 1/10 the jobs in circulation as there are now or if it took 10x as long for men to build muscle mass while exercising, is there any doubt that redpillers would not budge an inch in their mindset, or if anything just be
more extreme in blaming men for their lack of success? "money is a reflection of your worth" "you'd have a job and money if you really tried" "just hit the gym bro" "just hit the gym bro" "just hit the gym bro"
This mindset is also where nofap comes from.
From my experience, redpillers will often even exalt and celebrate female promiscuity, in a manner comparable to Feminists. The redpill really largely just seems to be brads and chads mocking less attractive or successful men under pretense of giving them advice for better oppurtunities for themselves. They may not be a typical progressive/Feminist/Leftist in mindset on the surface, but it's just that—superficial. Cut them and a liberal bleeds, they are fundamentally indistinguishable in their defense of the norms of modern liberal bourgeois society in the West. This is coming from much personal experience, I had a friend who was extremely Left-wing/Feminist but also had an individual blame mindset identical to that of redpillers in rhetoric.
You then, however, proceed to describe the blackpill accurately and correctly conclude that the blackpill's confrontation with reality is precisely what makes it
not misogynist—it correctly describes women as they are, so there's nothing to fault them for, as they are just following social pressures and biology according to their traits, background, options and disposition.
If anything, a man is much more likely to be misogynist if he is
not blackpilled, because obviously one is more likely to blame and feel hatred to women if they don't understand them. This is what really makes normies calling blackpilled incels misogynist so idiotic. Like picture the difference between a child who is angry at their pet or younger sibling because they act in a certain way, versus an adult who understands that an infant or animal is just acting according to its nature and it isn't within its control. The same is true for women. We can simultaneously be fair to ourselves and call out Feminist double-standards by holding them accountable as adults on the same standard society holds men to, while also on another level observing their selfishness and bad behavior in the end can be characterized as childish and hence usually just warrants pity, if anything, and not hatred.
Neither the redpill or the blackpill are misogynist, so I don't see why you characterize it this way. "Misogyny" itself is basically a non-existent boogeyman concept like "patriarchy" that's used against people willing to confront these realities by falsely conflating them to the type of men who would be abusive to women. (precisely the problem of course is that women are at the same time often drawn to these types of men and put themselves in abusive relationships.)
The entire reason we are here and are blackpilled is because we recognize the fault of both the bluepill (which needs no introduction and is obviously just a way normies can dismiss us) and the redpill, which claims to be in opposition to the bluepill, and can indeed potentially help men
within what they can control. The problem with it is just that by only focusing on this to the exclusion of confronting natural and social realities outside of what is in our control it winds up in effect serving a similar role to the bluepill in reinforcing social premises and defending women, and can even be especially destructive because it can drive men crazy, potentially leading them to ironically becoming more angry or suicidal as it insists that all success is purely within one's control despite the focused individual effort it advocates not necessarily leading to greater success and hence lets off both women and society in the process.
