According to the redpill logic, there is an asymmetry and male advantage: The male cums a lot, and can potentially cum in many women. Instead, the woman has less "chances" of reproductive success (in terms of babies spawned, this is a redpill comparison), because she can carry out "less" pregnancies (compared to the male alpha redpill). So, according to the redpill logic, the male (seen as a brutal caveman), wants to fuck women and nothing less, he wants to "hunt" the "preys". And these are the precise terms used by the redpill man. Woman, described as "prey". Male is the reproducer that identifies himself with his biological mission, he is "the redpilled".
The advantage, in the redpill logic, consists in the fact that the man, identified with his biological mission, must now only cum, therefore by his physical constitution he can proceed with this practice, and he is justified by nature itself, by the very fact that he was born male.
The redpill logic, praises upon the naturalistic fallacy, to ultimately justify the sexual obsession of the "redpilled man". This logic is flawed, and painful for the carrier (if he is ugly). There may follow errors and bugs: I am polygamist, women are sluts, I am alpha, women are low-value if they don't chase me. Redpill is also one of the reasons why tradcuckery is so strong in the manosphere. Because, tradcuckery is the logical explanation to solve this "issue". With tradcuckery in action, you can create a great society limiting male-to-male competition. Foids for everyone, and therefore better society.
Redpill logic again: Women have 9 months of inactivity during pregnancy, they can make "few" errors, when they reproduce with the wrong male, they can "at most" repeat the process with others a couple of times, certainly they have problems due to the fact that they must be protected during the period in which they need this protection. So, the male "privilege" is biologically set in stone, justified by nature itself. This is the redpill logic.
Blackpill POV: "Nature", used by redpilled men, is a (sub)human construct, flawed, fallacious. They believe in "nature", that there's an intrinsic mission created by so called "nature". Replacing the word "god" with the word "nature", does not change an old argument, old like the human history.
Blackpill POV: Chad has no intrinsic value, its physical attractiveness is the basis of the cognitive process of assigning value, it's the base. It's all about looks. Chad is only the fruit of the voluntary servitude of beta normies slaves and the selection process of foids. Women and normies are all together a collective mind, so that "positive" value of Chads exists only as their mental image. Incel is pulled out, he is not a normie and therefore his purpose is different than the one of a normie. There is no male-advantage, women and Chads are privileged (by normies) and advantaged, redpilled men are wrong.
The advantage, in the redpill logic, consists in the fact that the man, identified with his biological mission, must now only cum, therefore by his physical constitution he can proceed with this practice, and he is justified by nature itself, by the very fact that he was born male.
The redpill logic, praises upon the naturalistic fallacy, to ultimately justify the sexual obsession of the "redpilled man". This logic is flawed, and painful for the carrier (if he is ugly). There may follow errors and bugs: I am polygamist, women are sluts, I am alpha, women are low-value if they don't chase me. Redpill is also one of the reasons why tradcuckery is so strong in the manosphere. Because, tradcuckery is the logical explanation to solve this "issue". With tradcuckery in action, you can create a great society limiting male-to-male competition. Foids for everyone, and therefore better society.
Redpill logic again: Women have 9 months of inactivity during pregnancy, they can make "few" errors, when they reproduce with the wrong male, they can "at most" repeat the process with others a couple of times, certainly they have problems due to the fact that they must be protected during the period in which they need this protection. So, the male "privilege" is biologically set in stone, justified by nature itself. This is the redpill logic.
Blackpill POV: "Nature", used by redpilled men, is a (sub)human construct, flawed, fallacious. They believe in "nature", that there's an intrinsic mission created by so called "nature". Replacing the word "god" with the word "nature", does not change an old argument, old like the human history.
Blackpill POV: Chad has no intrinsic value, its physical attractiveness is the basis of the cognitive process of assigning value, it's the base. It's all about looks. Chad is only the fruit of the voluntary servitude of beta normies slaves and the selection process of foids. Women and normies are all together a collective mind, so that "positive" value of Chads exists only as their mental image. Incel is pulled out, he is not a normie and therefore his purpose is different than the one of a normie. There is no male-advantage, women and Chads are privileged (by normies) and advantaged, redpilled men are wrong.
