Title
0 replies
Who the fuck reads philosophy and why? I read templars of the proletariat but it's by duginigger. And i tried reading evola but quit because he started talking about little goblins running around and he could see them and i just couldn't relate. Just think for yourself
I'm also a solipsist bro, but i want to know why the hell so many people recommend a book so I can judge it myself gg
Read templars then, he had a few interesting chapters but a lot of Russian Z slop
@The Judge
Chad would've gotten 100 replies right after posting.
On the Heights of Despair by Cioran is a blackpill classic, it's so blackpilled it loops into whitepill
Nicomachean Ethics is good if you want to start with the Greeks as the maymay says
Meditations is good if you want to learn how to whitepill by brute force
Beyond Good and Evil is the best way to get started with Nietzsche
Nicomachean Ethics is good if you want to start with the Greeks as the maymay says
Meditations is good if you want to learn how to whitepill by brute force
Beyond Good and Evil is the best way to get started with Nietzsche
I used to be heavily into it especially as a teenager, I don't give a fuck anymore but I always disliked when people assumed you will just absorb whatever you've read and parrot it instead of "thinking for yourself". That's what anyone will do, it's just that sometimes these faggot ass pedophile philosophers have an interesting insight you wouldn't have thought about before. And if they're wrong you'll know because unless you're genuinely retarded you will not just nod and accept everything you see.
>has the redpill on the cover
wdtmbt?
wdtmbt?
No i mean there's nothing to absorb from there. It's all mumbo jumbo. I mean think for yourself as in only you know what's true, you will probably never relate to these philosophers and if you do it's something you already knew. They can't say anything you wouldn't think of yourself unless it's some retarded mind virus that isn't relevant.
I only recommended templar's because it talks about some historical things like ancient people knowing the planets rotations and shit i thought was interesting
You're not supposed to "relate" to philosophers, this isn't a movie lol
you just read and if you get anything from it, good for you
The Analects of Confucius
Yes you are, if you haven't observed any of the things they explain happen in reality, it could be complete nonsense
I don't understand how that is "relating" to the author as much as it is just understanding the feasibility of whatever it is you're reading
That's how i see it. I see someone explain why things are a certain way, i remember how things were in fact like that, i relate and agree. Y'know?
Goethe's Faust - to be one step closer to God and understand the world we live in
Albert Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus - for incels of any kind to keep fighting against all odds
Jean Paul Sartre's Existentialism is a Humanism - to feel ontologically free to live your life
Albert Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus - for incels of any kind to keep fighting against all odds
Jean Paul Sartre's Existentialism is a Humanism - to feel ontologically free to live your life
Human All Too Human by Nietzche
Discourse on the method by Descartes
Discourse on the method by Descartes
Last edited:
Feelsdevils, Belgrades, Kangas, Koalas, and Rachels when The Judges arrive on their doorstep:
The attentionpill
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
