Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Racepill Part 4 (bbc meme DEBUNKED)

Todays blackpill (racepill) class brought to you by 13k will be about debunking bbc meme and distinction between stated and revealed racial preferences

We see a lotta people on this forum saying “just be black theory”, women lust after black men” “I know women who cant stop praising how attractive black men are”. Is there any truth to it ? or these women just LIE to virtue signal ?

Lets see.

This study will break down on how blacks men/females fare with white people in dating scene in detail. I’ve done the dirty work for you and read the full study. As always I will be sharing main TAKEAWAYS and in the end of this thread you will see the sources and link to the full PDF version of study.

“Black/White Dating Online: Interracial Courtship in the 21st Century”

Gerald A. Mendelsohn, Lindsay Shaw Taylor, Andrew T. Fiore, and Coye Cheshire
University of California, Berkeley


The goal of the current research was to further our knowledge of interracial dating by examining concurrently the stated and revealed preferences of Black and White users of a major online dating site. The study is based on a nationwide sample of more than a million participants who were seeking a date with a member of the opposite sex.

The major questions to be addressed follow:

1. To what extent do Black and White daters state an interest in dating (a) members of their own race, and (b) members of a race/ethnicity other than their own?

2. To what extent do Black and White daters initiate contact with persons of their own race and of a race/ethnicity other than their own? In particular, what are the relative rates of Black–Black, Black–White, White–White, and White–Black contacts initiated by participants?

3. To what extent do Black and White daters reciprocate contacts they have received online

Race. As part of their personal profile, users indicated their own racial/ethnic identification by selecting one from among a list of labels provided by the site. For this article, we selected only those who self-identified as African American/Black or Caucasian/White.

The Results:
The results for stated and revealed preferences are shown in Tables 1–3.

Preferences
Screenshot 2018 4 30 ppm a0035357 pdf


In sum, Whites more than Blacks and women more than men stated a preference for a partner of their own race/ethnicity. Black males were least selective in the sense that the majority of them stated no preference in regard to the race/ethnicity of a potential partner. White females, half of whom sought a partner of their own race/ethnicity, were the most selective of the four Race/Gender groups.

2-Contacts Initiated
Screenshot 2018 4 30 ppm a0035357 pdf1

The most striking feature of the table is the difference between the behavior of the White and the Black users. An overwhelming majority (85% for females and males combined) of the contacts initiated by Whites were to Whites and a correspondingly small percent (3%) were to Blacks.

What about users who stated no racial or ethnic preferences? Was their stated indifference to race and ethnicity reflected in their behavior? The answer for Whites is that it was not, for even among those who specified no preference, contacts to Whites predominated greatly and contacts to Blacks were at a low level irrespective of age. In contrast, a majority of the contacts initiated by Black users in the category any were to members of races or ethnicities other than their own, including Whites.

3-Percent of Contacts Reciprocated
Screenshot 2018 4 30 ppm a0035357 pdf2


Black users, in fact, were as a group more likely to reciprocate a message from a White person than from a Black person, White users who stated an indifference to race and ethnicity nevertheless reciprocated at a higher rate to Whites than to Blacks or others, but Blacks, both male and female whose stated preference was any reciprocated at a higher rate to Whites and others than to Blacks.

Young White individuals who stated an indifference to the race or ethnicity of a partner were, in fact, highly selective in their revealed preferences; 85% of the contacts they initiated were to Whites and 3% to Blacks. Were they hypocritical, alert to the realities of the social world, striving for political correctness, attempting an optimizing strategy of self-presentation?


The Conclusion

We analyzed personal profiles and records of communication for more than a million nationwide users of a major online dating site. Overall, Blacks, especially Black men, proved more open to cross-race dating than did Whites. More than 80% of the contacts initiated by Whites were to Whites, with only 3% to Blacks. This sharp difference held for men and women and even for those who stated no racial or ethnic preference in their profiles. Blacks were 10 times more likely to contact Whites than Whites were to contact Blacks.

There was, however, an inconsistency between stated and revealed preferences for women: Women who stated no preference in regard to race/ethnicity nevertheless revealed in their behavior a strong same-race/ethnicity preference.

Together, the above studies suggest that (1) individuals’ decisions about who interests them as a potential date are strongly influenced by considerations of race/ethnicity, and (2) what individuals say they want can differ from what their behavior reveals about their preferences. This distinction between stated and revealed preferences will be of central concern in the current research.

To summarize, on both measures of revealed preference, Black users showed more interest in cross-race dating than did White users. This was the case for men and women, for the young and even for those (in the category any) whose stated preferences indicated an indifference to a partner’s ethnicity


Sources:
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ine_Interracial_courtship_in_the_21st_century
https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/ppm-a0035357.pdf





 
lol @ all the coping

JFL if you're black tbh.

The only race that has it worse are indians.

If we didn't have the big dick/athletic stereotype we'd much worse off than even indians.
 
lol @ all the coping

JFL if you're black tbh.

The only race that has it worse are indians.

If we didn't have the big dick/athletic stereotype we'd much worse off than even indians.
The thing is though I consider actual Africans on the same level as Curries, because the Stereotypes on apply on New World Blacks, old world blacks from Africa are just as fucked as Curries as they are both ugly, skinny, dark, have funny accents, and stinky. However, there are more Tyrones among old world Blacks than Chadpreets among curries
 
The thing is though I consider actual Africans on the same level as Curries, because the Stereotypes on apply on New World Blacks, old world blacks from Africa are just as fucked as Curries as they are both ugly, skinny, dark, have funny accents, and stinky. However, there are more Tyrones among old world Blacks than Chadpreets among curries

Blacks are better as a whole but if we're getting into the specifics of ethnicity then Somali men are probably the most subhuman.
 
remember when weed was so adamant you'd clean up tinder ? he swiped right all day long and could only get 1 black match LOL
and still writes shit like "skin color doesnt matter, its about BONES"
truly amazing. I guess nothing can make you see the truth if you just dont wanna accept it.
you have better bones than him, why didnt you get any matches then ?

What does PrinceOfCope look like? I'm assuming he's black with DOM looks?
 
Its over for us ugly niggers fml.
 
High IQ post. The old BBC trope is rooted in old school racism, when it was taboo (and so “naughty”) for a white woman to get with a “savage” black man. No one bats an eyelid at mixed race couples these days so this thrill is gone, booting blacks back into the ethnic scrap heap like the rest of us.
 
High IQ post. The old BBC trope is rooted in old school racism, when it was taboo (and so “naughty”) for a white woman to get with a “savage” black man. No one bats an eyelid at mixed race couples these days so this thrill is gone, booting blacks back into the ethnic scrap heap like the rest of us.

im lightskin and when i was younger and with my dad whos white, people would look at us crazy
 
Great post, professor blackpill hits again.
 
The only bbcs that are slaying or that have hfs are the high status ones like the best basketball player in my college I use to go to, dude is swimming in pussy lol,

But a regular BBC joe, its over,

You need to bring something to the table as a black, you can't be regular, but white can be regular or jbw is a literal theory
 
The only bbcs that are slaying or that have hfs are the high status ones like the best basketball player in my college I use to go to, dude is swimming in pussy lol,

But a regular BBC joe, its over,

You need to bring something to the table as a black, you can't be regular, but white can be regular or jbw is a literal theory

tbh tbh, sports, funny, status, or thugame as a black or its over
 
On cursory skim, this paper looks inferior to the last study for a couple reasons:

  1. analysis incapable of controlling for other significant covariates (eg, SES, education)
  2. geography of the userbase not provided
  3. bot-control measures not performed (unlike Lin and Lundquist's study)
  4. dichotomized race into Black-White, and presumably ignored any other ethnicity/race
Correct me if any of the above have been wrongly concluded in my haste, but the above might explain why the paper is published in seemingly no-name journal. In any case, this study does echo the observations seen in other studies of online dating (Hitsch 2006, 2010 and Feliciano, etc).

For anyone wondering where the BBC chasers are in the study, they are quantified to some extent. Look at table 2, the Young row (i.e., age 20-39) in "Only Different" x "White female initiatiors" column = likely BBC fetishists. But if you look at Table 1 you see this group only comprises 3% of the total Young White female demographic in the study. This is surprisingly consistent, as I believe it was Feliciano (or someone) showing a similar number of BBC chasers. I.e., they're out there, but they are comparatively extremely rare --> BBC theory = spotlight fallacy/cherry picking that pales in comparison to the proportion of women who are strict racial homophiles. Also, I believe Feliciano also mentioned in her study that the white women w/ black prefs were more likely to describe themselves as voluptuous (lol, not even joking, I remember it cuz it sounded so stereotypical)
 
Have any of you western blacks gone to Africa and tried to get laid? I would bet with your light(er) skin and western status you'd slay.
 
Have any of you western blacks gone to Africa and tried to get laid? I would bet with your light(er) skin and western status you'd slay.
>Fucking african bush niggers and dying of some monkey disease

"No"

Also you better have already gone to thailand yourself if this is your idea of good advice.
 
Have any of you western blacks gone to Africa and tried to get laid? I would bet with your light(er) skin and western status you'd slay.

If I wanted AIDS yeh but lmfao @ the lighter skin part.

I'm black AF and look Nigerian. Hence the username

Western status might help though... but it'd probably help most places.
 
>Fucking african bush niggers and dying of some monkey disease

"No"

Also you better have already gone to thailand yourself if this is your idea of good advice.
No i won't for the exact same reason. But everyone who preaches JBW tells me to go dumpster dive.
 
No i won't for the exact same reason. But everyone who preaches JBW tells me to go dumpster dive.
You can JBW in America too, bro.

Those fresh off the boat gooks. Direct imported goods.
 
You can JBW in America too, bro.

Those fresh off the boat gooks. Direct imported goods.
i went to a highschool with 50% asian population. not a look. autism man. it's tough talking like an npc.
 
Because If you’re black you need to be jacked or tall, that’s the selling point of blacks, masculinity and swagger

Most girls that fuck ethnics will be open to fuck black guys
 
It's about how exotic (stand out) you look in a particular country/area.
You can bet that in a 99%+ white area an average black male will slay pussy like mad.
Same goes for someone that is white in a 99%+ asian area etc.

Being perceived as exotic will get you poon.
 
The selling point of black guys is masculinity and swagger, so you need to be tall or jacked and NT

A lot of girls love cool black guys
 
The only bbcs that are slaying or that have hfs are the high status ones like the best basketball player in my college I use to go to, dude is swimming in pussy lol,

But a regular BBC joe, its over,

You need to bring something to the table as a black, you can't be regular, but white can be regular or jbw is a literal theory
You also need to be lightskin or conform to the stereotypes of African Americans(niggerism) or else its over

Sorry my blackcels
 
The selling point of black guys is masculinity and swagger, so you need to be tall or jacked and NT

A lot of girls love cool black guys

You still need FACE.

I'm black, tall and fairly fit. Not the most jacked dude but I have broad shoulders at least. I'm still invisible to women. Women care about face far more than anything else.
 
Late reply
I always knew that BBC theory was bullshit. In the area where I'm from, no woman would had ever wanted anything to do with black guys 10 years ago. But as the jews promoted the BBC meme since the early 2010's, I started to notice this phenomenon of ugly black guys making out with above 6 white women almost everyday around 2015-2016.
In UK it's opposite Biracial women marry white men at 80% rate
 
How could I miss this? This thread is BASED AS FUCK AND TERA-BLACKPILLED
 
bbc meme is pure pornography, whoever believes it watches blacked
 
Todays blackpill (racepill) class brought to you by 13k will be about debunking bbc meme and distinction between stated and revealed racial preferences

We see a lotta people on this forum saying “just be black theory”, women lust after black men” “I know women who cant stop praising how attractive black men are”. Is there any truth to it ? or these women just LIE to virtue signal ?

Lets see.

This study will break down on how blacks men/females fare with white people in dating scene in detail. I’ve done the dirty work for you and read the full study. As always I will be sharing main TAKEAWAYS and in the end of this thread you will see the sources and link to the full PDF version of study.

“Black/White Dating Online: Interracial Courtship in the 21st Century”
Gerald A. Mendelsohn, Lindsay Shaw Taylor, Andrew T. Fiore, and Coye Cheshire
University of California, Berkeley


The goal of the current research was to further our knowledge of interracial dating by examining concurrently the stated and revealed preferences of Black and White users of a major online dating site. The study is based on a nationwide sample of more than a million participants who were seeking a date with a member of the opposite sex.

The major questions to be addressed follow:

1. To what extent do Black and White daters state an interest in dating (a) members of their own race, and (b) members of a race/ethnicity other than their own?

2. To what extent do Black and White daters initiate contact with persons of their own race and of a race/ethnicity other than their own? In particular, what are the relative rates of Black–Black, Black–White, White–White, and White–Black contacts initiated by participants?

3. To what extent do Black and White daters reciprocate contacts they have received online

Race. As part of their personal profile, users indicated their own racial/ethnic identification by selecting one from among a list of labels provided by the site. For this article, we selected only those who self-identified as African American/Black or Caucasian/White.

The Results:
The results for stated and revealed preferences are shown in Tables 1–3.

Preferences
View attachment 10289

In sum, Whites more than Blacks and women more than men stated a preference for a partner of their own race/ethnicity. Black males were least selective in the sense that the majority of them stated no preference in regard to the race/ethnicity of a potential partner. White females, half of whom sought a partner of their own race/ethnicity, were the most selective of the four Race/Gender groups.

2-Contacts Initiated
View attachment 10290
The most striking feature of the table is the difference between the behavior of the White and the Black users. An overwhelming majority (85% for females and males combined) of the contacts initiated by Whites were to Whites and a correspondingly small percent (3%) were to Blacks.

What about users who stated no racial or ethnic preferences? Was their stated indifference to race and ethnicity reflected in their behavior? The answer for Whites is that it was not, for even among those who specified no preference, contacts to Whites predominated greatly and contacts to Blacks were at a low level irrespective of age. In contrast, a majority of the contacts initiated by Black users in the category any were to members of races or ethnicities other than their own, including Whites.

3-Percent of Contacts Reciprocated
View attachment 10294

Black users, in fact, were as a group more likely to reciprocate a message from a White person than from a Black person, White users who stated an indifference to race and ethnicity nevertheless reciprocated at a higher rate to Whites than to Blacks or others, but Blacks, both male and female whose stated preference was any reciprocated at a higher rate to Whites and others than to Blacks.

Young White individuals who stated an indifference to the race or ethnicity of a partner were, in fact, highly selective in their revealed preferences; 85% of the contacts they initiated were to Whites and 3% to Blacks. Were they hypocritical, alert to the realities of the social world, striving for political correctness, attempting an optimizing strategy of self-presentation?


The Conclusion


We analyzed personal profiles and records of communication for more than a million nationwide users of a major online dating site. Overall, Blacks, especially Black men, proved more open to cross-race dating than did Whites. More than 80% of the contacts initiated by Whites were to Whites, with only 3% to Blacks. This sharp difference held for men and women and even for those who stated no racial or ethnic preference in their profiles. Blacks were 10 times more likely to contact Whites than Whites were to contact Blacks.

There was, however, an inconsistency between stated and revealed preferences for women: Women who stated no preference in regard to race/ethnicity nevertheless revealed in their behavior a strong same-race/ethnicity preference.

Together, the above studies suggest that (1) individuals’ decisions about who interests them as a potential date are strongly influenced by considerations of race/ethnicity, and (2) what individuals say they want can differ from what their behavior reveals about their preferences. This distinction between stated and revealed preferences will be of central concern in the current research.

To summarize, on both measures of revealed preference, Black users showed more interest in cross-race dating than did White users. This was the case for men and women, for the young and even for those (in the category any) whose stated preferences indicated an indifference to a partner’s ethnicity


Sources:
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ine_Interracial_courtship_in_the_21st_century
https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/ppm-a0035357.pdf
thank you professor 13k for enlightening us :blackpill::feelsLSD::feelsLSD:
 
hey prof, can you do a racepill on mixed race(black/white) ethnics pls?
It's been nearly a full year without Hunter, deep nofap knights, stupid name they had tho.

many men banned, this post is a graveyard
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Lurkercel0
Replies
18
Views
285
Lurkercel0
Lurkercel0
Foremostfiend
Replies
17
Views
395
Regenerator
Regenerator
Made in Heaven
Replies
325
Views
8K
DarkStarDown
DarkStarDown

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top