Rotmwrt
Masseters Like a Clam
★
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2021
- Posts
- 59
I'm tired of seeing speds here claim "foids have it on easy mode, they don't even need to work, all they have to do is start an onlyfans". This is a nonsense claim.
Most women on OnlyFans are making jack shit (archive). It's a Pareto distribution more brutal than any dating app:
Why am I so mad about this? Because OnlyFans wants you to think otherwise, and you dumbfucks are buying into it. That sensational tweet or insta post, in which some Bongland 10 brags about "buyin' a new 'ouuse wif me onlyfans munny"? It isn't real. It's viral marketing. OnlyFans is spreading and sponsoring that shit, to give women the impression that they can make real money off of it. Most of them won't. Most of them will receive pocket change in exchange for renting their asshole to this king. And that's the biggest whitepill of all.
If you claim to hate women, you shouldn't do so much unpaid shilling for a service that gives (a small minority of) women free money.
In a similar vein: don't seethe at OnlyFans girls for being successful. Women love it when you do that - it feeds their narcissistic conception of themselves as "too hot for men to handle". Instead, find a girl in the unsuccessful majority - who can't find a single person willing to pay five bucks for butthole pics - and mock her mercilessly for it. Being undesirable is the worst thing in the world to them.
Most women on OnlyFans are making jack shit (archive). It's a Pareto distribution more brutal than any dating app:
The revenue of content creators follows a classic power law distribution. The top accounts make something like $100,000 a month (these aren’t in my sample). The median account makes $180 a month.
The top 1% of accounts make 33% of all the money. The top 10% of accounts make 73% of all the money. This isn’t the 80:20 rule; it’s the 80:14 rule.
The standard way to measure inequality of an economy is with a Gini Index. An index of 0 implies a communist utopia, a value of 1 implies a single greedy capitalist owns all the wealth. The Gini index of OnlyFans is 0.83 (Gini Index of Tinder is 0.58). The most unequal society in the world, South Africa, has a Gini index of 0.68. OnlyFans is less equal than an ex-apartheid state.
[...]
Most accounts take home less than $145 per month (after commission). The modal (that's "most common" for you low-IQcels) revenue is $0.00, and the next most common is $4.99.
Creators put hours into each post, and on top of that, they interact one-on-one, with fans who can message them at any time. To break even on an OnlyFans account, creators need to earn more per month than the cost of hours spent engaging. The median take-home revenue is $136 per month. If you value a creator’s time at a $15 minimum wage, the median creator needs to be spending less than 9 hours per month on her OnlyFans to break even. This is less than 20 minutes a day.
[...]
Relative to effort, it looks like most accounts lose money.
Why am I so mad about this? Because OnlyFans wants you to think otherwise, and you dumbfucks are buying into it. That sensational tweet or insta post, in which some Bongland 10 brags about "buyin' a new 'ouuse wif me onlyfans munny"? It isn't real. It's viral marketing. OnlyFans is spreading and sponsoring that shit, to give women the impression that they can make real money off of it. Most of them won't. Most of them will receive pocket change in exchange for renting their asshole to this king. And that's the biggest whitepill of all.
If you claim to hate women, you shouldn't do so much unpaid shilling for a service that gives (a small minority of) women free money.
In a similar vein: don't seethe at OnlyFans girls for being successful. Women love it when you do that - it feeds their narcissistic conception of themselves as "too hot for men to handle". Instead, find a girl in the unsuccessful majority - who can't find a single person willing to pay five bucks for butthole pics - and mock her mercilessly for it. Being undesirable is the worst thing in the world to them.