Question for stormfrontcels

[Deleted member 40696]

Would be ok with being cuckold raising white chads kids, and saving white race by being good cuck paying taxes and raising other white childern?

 

[racoon4]

no, you're still a cuck

 

[Incelius Savage]

what's a stromfrontcel?

 

[Deleted member 40696]

what's a stromfrontcel?

White supremacists

 

[Deleted member 37148]

Werearyan would do it no questions asked

 

[genma]

Would be ok with being cuckold raising white chads kids, and saving white race by being good cuck paying taxes and raising other white childern?

No, because that too decreases the genetic fitness of the race.

What you're describing is called "r-selection" and what raised the IQs of races (for whom the IQs went up) was that the cold weather necessitated k-selection.

Women are the gatekeepers of reproduction. We shouldn't be rewarding women who fail in that responsibility. And the responsibility (in the context of k-selection) os much more than simply spreading her legs. Her responsibility is to lock a man down. She's supposed to use her femininity to make a man fall in love with her so that he stays with her long enough for the child to be born and weened. At least 3 years.

It's a woman's responsibility to make a man love her, and if she can't do that, she should accept that fact and try another man. If she can't do it, but has sex with him anyway, she's a failure and her genetic line should suffer the consequences of that. Men should not marry single mothers. The government should not support single mothers. Frankly, there shouldn't even be child support for single mothers (instead of child support, other women should refuse to have sex with a man who abandoned a woman).

Everything I just said is rational and is what's best for our entire species, including black people. Denying what I just said is a huge cause of the problems we all see in society (the other cause is birth control).

In the world I described above (no child support/no government welfare/most men wont marry a single mom), chads would marry, removing them from the market. Then the 9s would marry, then the 8s, etc. This is called assortative matching. Eventually, you would get your looksmatch. It wouldn't be an easy life - I'm not saying that. She'd expect you to work hard to provide for her. She wouldn't let you be NEET or indulge your anxiety. But society as a whole would prosper.

Instead, women indulge their hypergamy until they are flung head-first off the cock carousel. Then they have the audacity to ask you to care for another man's baby! It doesn't matter if the baby is white or black. You shouldn't reward her bad behavior.

 

[Deleted member 40696]

No, because that too decreases the genetic fitness of the race.

What you're describing is called "r-selection" and what raised the IQs of races (for whom the IQs went up) was that the cold weather necessitated k-selection.

Women are the gatekeepers of reproduction. We shouldn't be rewarding women who fail in that responsibility. And the responsibility (in the context of k-selection) os much more than simply spreading her legs. Her responsibility is to lock a man down. She's supposed to use her femininity to make a man fall in love with her so that he stays with her long enough for the child to be born and weened. At least 3 years.

It's a woman's responsibility to make a man love her, and if she can't do that, she should accept that fact and try another man. If she can't do it, but has sex with him anyway, she's a failure and her genetic line should suffer the consequences of that. Men should not marry single mothers. The government should not support single mothers. Frankly, there shouldn't even be child support for single mothers (instead of child support, other women should refuse to have sex with a man who abandoned a woman).

Everything I just said is rational and is what's best for our entire species, including black people. Denying what I just said is a huge cause of the problems we all see in society (the other cause is birth control).

In the world I described above (no child support/no government welfare/most men wont marry a single mom), chads would marry, removing them from the market. Then the 9s would marry, then the 8s, etc. This is called assortative matching. Eventually, you would get your looksmatch. It wouldn't be an easy life - I'm not saying that. She'd expect you to work hard to provide for her. She wouldn't let you be NEET or indulge your anxiety. But society as a whole would prosper.

Instead, women indulge their hypergamy until they are flung head-first off the cock carousel. Then they have the audacity to ask you to care for another man's baby! It doesn't matter if the baby is white or black. You shouldn't reward her bad behavior.

True white supremacist would

 

[racoon4]

No, because that too decreases the genetic fitness of the race.

What you're describing is called "r-selection" and what raised the IQs of races (for whom the IQs went up) was that the cold weather necessitated k-selection.

Women are the gatekeepers of reproduction. We shouldn't be rewarding women who fail in that responsibility. And the responsibility (in the context of k-selection) os much more than simply spreading her legs. Her responsibility is to lock a man down. She's supposed to use her femininity to make a man fall in love with her so that he stays with her long enough for the child to be born and weened. At least 3 years.

It's a woman's responsibility to make a man love her, and if she can't do that, she should accept that fact and try another man. If she can't do it, but has sex with him anyway, she's a failure and her genetic line should suffer the consequences of that. Men should not marry single mothers. The government should not support single mothers. Frankly, there shouldn't even be child support for single mothers (instead of child support, other women should refuse to have sex with a man who abandoned a woman).

Everything I just said is rational and is what's best for our entire species, including black people. Denying what I just said is a huge cause of the problems we all see in society (the other cause is birth control).

In the world I described above (no child support/no government welfare/most men wont marry a single mom), chads would marry, removing them from the market. Then the 9s would marry, then the 8s, etc. This is called assortative matching. Eventually, you would get your looksmatch. It wouldn't be an easy life - I'm not saying that. She'd expect you to work hard to provide for her. She wouldn't let you be NEET or indulge your anxiety. But society as a whole would prosper.

Instead, women indulge their hypergamy until they are flung head-first off the cock carousel. Then they have the audacity to ask you to care for another man's baby! It doesn't matter if the baby is white or black. You shouldn't reward her bad behavior.

FACTS!!!