Between the Agricultural Revolution and WWII, marriages would be arranged. Guys wouldn't get a "14-18 year old girl," they'd get someone their own fucking age. If you desire a 14-18 year old girl yourself as an adult, do a rope.
Massive cope. Many ancient civilisations especially prioritised for girls to be married off before they hit puberty sometimes. The Romans for example, who were arguably the most successful civilisation to ever exist, prioritised this form of arranged marriage. A famous example, the stoic Philosopher Emperor Marcus Aurelius, was betrothed to Faustina when she was 7 and he was around 30 years of age, then married off to him when she was 14. Look at this graph below.
Your desire for children is not natural: You are a sick fuck and you'd be chemically castrated in an ideal society.
Define what a 'child' is objectively? By that accord, a man who is attracted to bigger body size could just call you being attracted to 'children' because that's how subjective you're being. Also, define what 'natural' is, because everything in nature that happens is natural. And also, we don't live in nature anymore clearly, so everything that we have now is natural. The roof over your head is unnatural, the food that is handed to you that would otherwise be scavenging in nature is also not a natural concept. What basis are you arguing on?
It has been argued that sexual attraction even to prepubescent girls is a natural response to wanting to secure all the reproductive years of a female. It is supposed to have been an evolutionary trait in males, and that is what makes men less teleiophilic then women and that's why no one gave a shit about pedohysteria until the late 18th century. You can't oppress male sexuality, mate. You can't oppress the 52% of men who show a strong sexual attraction to pre-teen foids, you can't stop it at all. And you can't stop men showing 1/4th the sexual attraction their show to prepubescent foids too, which isn't an insignifant amount too. Are you going to castrate them now?
Penis volume changes in response to pictures of nude females and males of various ages provided a basis for determining the order of erotic appeal ...
eurekamag.com
- Not a pedophile. I prefer older women and am simply not attracted to literal children, and I shun anyone who is.
You prefer older women? Did you know that the functional ability/fluid intelligence of 30-35 year old women on average is lower than 12-15 year old women? Also, the fluid intelligence of a 50 year old foid is the same as an 8 year old, but yet they still have more SMV than any incel on here. Why are you attracted to MILFs, they have the literal mind of a child. Also, if the crystalised memory of a 50 year old was resetted (crystalised memory peaks at around 25 and it's responsible for storing information), they would have the mind of an 8 year old. Projection much, huh?
Also, no one here is a pedophile, stop using that lookist term, you're only oppressing your kind. No one here is exclusively sexually attracted to prepubescent boys. That's what the original definition coined in 1906 meant, otherwise before that, it would have been classified as a broad type of homosexuality.
I have a moral obligation to protect young men from inceldom. Their foids are theirs. I don't care at all for the well-being of any toilets, not even the children.
What moral obligation? Where do your morals come from? You're a moral relativist, you have no objective morality because it doesn't exist anyways. Your moral obligations come from lookist values based on the Overton Window which goes by the same mob mentality that oppresses incels today. By that accord, you would been in the Venice sex market 300 years ago buying child sex slaves, because that was the accepted norm by all the socially programmed NPCs back then and you would have been one too.
Also, in the ideal society that enforces monogamy, are same age marriages going to distribute virgin women equally? They're going to lose their virginity as soon as they gain a sex drive and they're going to have premarital sex out of marriage (then it's going to be too late to marry them off and hardworking men will get leftovers that can't pair bond at all) and also marrying a foid your age also means that you miss out on reproductive years that you could have seized from her. Not to mention, there would be excessive onfighting between men and the women they want, and not every man would get the woman they want in a society where monogamy is enforced since many of them will be flat chested or have flat buttocks, so what's the point of marrying them off late?
the way peds hide out in the gay community I notice it here too. don’t see much interaction which is nice
Pedophilia is a psyop word only coined in 1906 to cause hysteria and for the first vestiges of first wave feminism after the Christian Puritan Feminists outlawed child prostitution that was peddled mostly by single mothers, and young women themselves who willingly prostituted themselves before they bled. None of these little girls would have even pissed on you to save you from burning to death from a fire anyways and would have watched you die whilst making out with minichad if they were alive now, so why the fuck care about them?
No one gave a shit about it before because exclusive attraction to prepubescent boys was classified as broader homosexuality and was penalised accordingly. Pedophilia doesn't exist anyways, no one is exclusively attracted to prepubescent boys, not even homosexuals themselves because most homosexuals tend to gravitate towards prepubescent boys only when their primary choice isn't available.
If it was such a 'problem', then why the fuck would the word change definitions many times, and why did it only even get popularised in its bastardised form in the 1970s? It's meaning has been changed in the 1930s by Jew Magnus Hirschfeld who changed broader homosexual terms like ephebophilia (exclusive sexual attraction to adult men) to generalise them and apply them to both genders, and this helped with giving women, especially young women, further hypoagency, all capitalising on lookism and bioleninism.
