Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Prohibition of prostitution is the downfall

govnyaker

govnyaker

Captain
★★★★
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Posts
1,792
Seriously, it was around until 20th century and the world rolled just fine, but now when it is illegal everything seems to be more degenerate than ever.
How is this paradox possible?
 
Hookers are dirty and low iq
 
Prostitution seems like a good cope.
 
they should make it legal to buy sex but not sell it just like how some places do it with drugs. a lot of countries have it the opposite way jfl.
 
Seriously, it was around until 20th century and the world rolled just fine, but now when it is illegal everything seems to be more degenerate than ever.
How is this paradox possible?
Where are you right now. It’s legal in UK
 
because frustrated man going to see used whore selling her roast beef bad!!!!!!!!!!
 
It should be regularized like in Medieval Times. Prostitution is whatever: it for sures lowers the value for sex as a whole so I don´t see an issue with that.
 
Same exact reason the AoC is higher than ever.

All about old roasties and their salt about declining SMV.
 
It should be regularized like in Medieval Times. Prostitution is whatever: it for sures lowers the value for sex as a whole so I don´t see an issue with that.

Exactly. It's needed to restore balance as the set of socio-sexual norms when it was prohibited/limited across the U.S are no longer in effect. The earlier generation of men who allowed its prohibition went along with it under the assumption that the largely conservative norms of the time would remain in effect. Clearly that hasn't been the case. Feminists straight up lie and say they are for legalization but they are ONLY willing to consider legalization from the perspective of "what's good for the prostitute" which is why they largely approve of the idea of allowing selling but not buying (nordic model).

The revealed preference of liberal/feminist women is that they don't want prostitution legalized out of self-interest. Their unwillingness to have compassion for the "Johns" -- overwhelmingly lonely men who could very well just whack off to hardcore pornography but want to experience touch and companionship they can't otherwise get (don't a lot of prostitutes report a large number of their clients just wanting to talk?) -- speaks volumes.

Normalizing prostitution is necessary to reduce the male thirst caused by the hoarding of female erotic capital by top men as a result of the decline of monogamy and marriage. If we can no longer shame women for sleeping around then legalizing and normalizing prostitution is necessary to correct the imbalance caused by females willing to share attractive men. It's not fair that "single" for a young woman can still mean "I nonetheless easily get my hetero physical intimacy needs met!" in a way it isn't for single men. This fact causes social inequality. If women have been released from the burden of monogamy then it's absolutely bonkers to keep prostitution prohibited, a fact made clear by the very language used to keep the activity illegal which basically paints women as child-like and lacking the neurons to decide whether or not they should get dicked for money.

It's true that social conservatives and Christians don't want prostitution to be legalized, and I understand. But those folk also didn't want gay marriage to happen and they lost that big time. So yea, why aren't Democrats going all out about sexual liberty when it comes to buying sex? Cause their female voters don't want it.

Either we place limitations on the sexuality of both sexes --i.e the traditional conservative arrangement (keeping in mind that controlling female sexuality = controlling male sexuality by proxy) or it should be sexual liberty for all. Once you see the limitations of prostitution as a limitation of your sexuality -- and you then consider the present Tinder culture -- you can't help but get a little angry about the matter as a human-rights issue.
 
Exactly. It's needed to restore balance as the set of socio-sexual norms when it was prohibited/limited across the U.S are no longer in effect. The earlier generation of men who allowed its prohibition went along with it under the assumption that the largely conservative norms of the time would remain in effect. Clearly that hasn't been the case. Feminists straight up lie and say they are for legalization but they are ONLY willing to consider legalization from the perspective of "what's good for the prostitute" which is why they largely approve of the idea of allowing selling but not buying (nordic model).

The revealed preference of liberal/feminist women is that they don't want prostitution legalized out of self-interest. Their unwillingness to have compassion for the "Johns" -- overwhelmingly lonely men who could very well just whack off to hardcore pornography but want to experience touch and companionship they can't otherwise get (don't a lot of prostitutes report a large number of their clients just wanting to talk?) -- speaks volumes.

Normalizing prostitution is necessary to reduce the male thirst caused by the hoarding of female erotic capital by top men as a result of the decline of monogamy and marriage. If we can no longer shame women for sleeping around then legalizing and normalizing prostitution is necessary to correct the imbalance caused by females willing to share attractive men. It's not fair that "single" for a young woman can still mean "I nonetheless easily get my hetero physical intimacy needs met!" in a way it isn't for single men. This fact causes social inequality. If women have been released from the burden of monogamy then it's absolutely bonkers to keep prostitution prohibited, a fact made clear by the very language used to keep the activity illegal which basically paints women as child-like and lacking the neurons to decide whether or not they should get dicked for money.

It's true that social conservatives and Christians don't want prostitution to be legalized, and I understand. But those folk also didn't want gay marriage to happen and they lost that big time. So yea, why aren't Democrats going all out about sexual liberty when it comes to buying sex? Cause their female voters don't want it.

Either we place limitations on the sexuality of both sexes --i.e the traditional conservative arrangement (keeping in mind that controlling female sexuality = controlling male sexuality by proxy) or it should be sexual liberty for all. Once you see the limitations of prostitution as a limitation of your sexuality -- and you then consider the present Tinder culture -- you can't help but get a little angry about the matter as a human-rights issue.
:bigbrain:very highIQ and well written:feelsaww:
 
It's true that social conservatives and Christians don't want prostitution to be legalized, and I understand. But those folk also didn't want gay marriage to happen and they lost that big time.
I´m aware of that, yet, in Medieval Times (the most traditional era for some Catholics), prostitution was regularized (like in the Spain of the Catholic Kings).
 
If prostitution gets banned (what Germany is debating about) the number of rapes is gonna skyrocket.
:feelsdevil:
 
doubt it, it's usually normies doing the raping
But how do you think all the incel tier guys are getting the real thing from?
Fapping isnt good enough, at least in my opinion.
 
But how do you think all the incel tier guys are getting the real thing from?
Fapping isnt good enough, at least in my opinion.
most americans -- where prostitution is criminalized -- here end up fapping, not raping
 

Similar threads

AustrianMogger
Replies
5
Views
233
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger
TheTurkeyNeck
Replies
19
Views
193
Abacaxi14
Abacaxi14
daydreamER
Replies
13
Views
305
Kimchicel
Kimchicel
SubhumanGamer
Replies
26
Views
330
MiSKiRaT
MiSKiRaT
S
Replies
29
Views
466
The Scarlet Prince
The Scarlet Prince

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top