Programming a Black Pill related software calculating SMV?

[Dude420]

I am thinking about programming a software that would help people figure out their SMV (particularly helping people who aren't as familiar with black pill ideologies)
It would ask questions about your height, ethnicity, body shape, jawline, money, etc which would give you a final SMV score, placing you in the SMV graph (age related).
The software would then tell you what reactions you would get if you were to approach women of different SMV.
Then you could be more precise about women, enter their similar information about age, height, etc + how slutty she seems to be (how many partners in the past)
On top of the chance of attracting her, it would then tell you how long the relationship would last on average, the chances of being cheated, risks of you were to marry her (divorce rape), etc.
I thinking about giving black pill related info all the way through the questionnaire, showcasing the relevancy of each question.
But it would probably be a hybrid red pill/black pill app, probably mainly camouflage as red pill because it has a bigger reach (and it has a brighter PUA side, and people like hope, it won't all be Incels responding so there is hope for them anyway)
Not sure if app or website yet. If it were an app it probably it might be infringing on some policies.

Do you think this type of app/software could be popular, do you believe I should go through with it? If so why?

Btw I have been studying Evolutionary Psychology extensively and I consume a great deal of red pill/black pill content, so I have a very good grasp of how all of those factors interact with SMV.

 

[Void]

You are going to have a bad time when you try to include ethnicity, height, and pretty much about anything as a factor for SMV if this thing go mainstream.

How would you even determine what would be the amount to be added? The logistics of even performing a single experiment alone as you account for this much of endogeneity would make any statistician go mad. Even if we leave out how you manage to find such data, the amount of heteroscedasticity or how the the data spread over the regression analysis (which you'll need to even make an a graph of this scale) given literally any variable in this case would make it almost impossible to confirm such a trend exist.

I very highly doubt this is possible, but commend you for your idea of creating such a product that can help people in the dating market.

 

[Dude420]

You are going to have a bad time when you try to include ethnicity, height, and pretty much about anything as a factor for SMV if this thing go mainstream.

How would you even determine what would be the amount to be added? The logistics of even performing a single experiment alone as you account for this much of endogeneity would make any statistician go mad. Even if we leave out how you manage to find such data, the amount of heteroscedasticity or how the the data spread over the regression analysis (which you'll need to even make an a graph of this scale) given literally any variable in this case would make it almost impossible to confirm such a trend exist.

I very highly doubt this is possible, but commend you for your idea of creating such a product that can help people in the dating market.

I have experience programming algorithm of that sort, I know I can pull it off, I mean the results might not be of the absolute perfection for every possible scenario, but for the most part yes, within a certain reasonable range (better than average joe own assessment) it is doable.

 

[PleaseKillMeLoseSkin]

I've always wondered why tinder didn't have a smv score so it can show the person to whom they'd be best suited.

 

[Void]

I have experience programming algorithm of that sort, I know I can pull it off, I mean the results might not be of the absolute perfection for every possible scenario, but for the most part yes, within a certain reasonable range (better than average joe own assessment) it is doable.

I understand, you can absolutely do something like that, it is very plausible but not very practical if you want to be taken seriously. It's just that I have done it myself and seen this happen to other statisticians when they first starting out. Good idea, but impossible to be done due to data / mathematical or computing limitations.

If you are willing to pursue this task, I would be very interested to know what kind of data you use and how you assign them.

Do it for fun and as a learning experience, I am excited to see the results.

 

[Dude420]

I understand, you can absolutely do something like that, it is very plausible but not very practical if you want to be taken seriously. It's just that I have done it myself and seen this happen to other statisticians when they first starting out. Good idea, but impossible to be done due to data / mathematical or computing limitations.

If you are willing to pursue this task, I would be very interested to know what kind of data you use and how you assign them.

Do it for fun and as a learning experience, I am excited to see the results.

I have been able to program a software that evaluates NHL(hockey) draft-eligible prospects, people were telling me it wasn't doable, that wouldn't be precise enough, now I am getting mad respect for it and getting great results, I am becoming the most sought-after scouting list by the community. One algorithm factoring players playing in different leagues, different quality of linemates, different internal competition for ice time, different age, different size, different skill set, different goal assists ratio, with/without tournament play, factoring 3 years, etc, I pulled it off. No background in math, just pure reasoning and experimental tries. It is fucking precise now, does better than myself looking at the player play and looking at stats alone.

The end results look something like that it factors both scouting evaluations of attributes and analytics. Gives you a final score, with score for each last 3 seasons of play and even tells you what style of player the prospect is.


That's a small part of the algorithm to give you an idea, I grinded that shit out.

 

[Hunter]

walnut IQ idea. SMV is way too complex to be broken down in algorithm

 

[Dude420]

I understand, you can absolutely do something like that, it is very plausible but not very practical if you want to be taken seriously. It's just that I have done it myself and seen this happen to other statisticians when they first starting out. Good idea, but impossible to be done due to data / mathematical or computing limitations.

If you are willing to pursue this task, I would be very interested to know what kind of data you use and how you assign them.

Do it for fun and as a learning experience, I am excited to see the results.

Btw, the software probably going to be half-serious and half not taking itself seriously. If it is too serious I doubt it could be as popular. The dating scene is a joke in of itself. My target demographic is probably the young adults which might have somewhat got himself into the red pill ideologies and which don't take this as seriously as people on this forum. I think most people would fuck around with a software of that sort.

 

[Frankenstein's M.]

I am thinking about programming a software that would help people figure out their SMV (particularly helping people who aren't as familiar with black pill ideologies)
It would ask questions about your height, ethnicity, body shape, jawline, money, etc which would give you a final SMV score, placing you in the SMV graph (age related).
The software would then tell you what reactions you would get if you were to approach women of different SMV.
Then you could be more precise about women, enter their similar information about age, height, etc + how slutty she seems to be (how many partners in the past)
On top of the chance of attracting her, it would then tell you how long the relationship would last on average, the chances of being cheated, risks of you were to marry her (divorce rape), etc.
I thinking about giving black pill related info all the way through the questionnaire, showcasing the relevancy of each question.
But it would probably be a hybrid red pill/black pill app, probably mainly camouflage as red pill because it has a bigger reach (and it has a brighter PUA side, and people like hope, it won't all be Incels responding so there is hope for them anyway)
Not sure if app or website yet. If it were an app it probably it might be infringing on some policies.

Do you think this type of app/software could be popular, do you believe I should go through with it? If so why?

Btw I have been studying Evolutionary Psychology extensively and I consume a great deal of red pill/black pill content, so I have a very good grasp of how all of those factors interact with SMV.

Seems like a lot of work to me, but I'd applaud you if it's done

 

[Dude420]

Seems like a lot of work to me, but I'd applaud you if it's done

Agree, my question would be is it be worth the return, would enough person be interested in trying it?

 

[Void]

I have been able to program a software that evaluates NHL(hockey) draft-eligible prospects, people were telling me it wasn't doable, that wouldn't be precise enough, now I am getting mad respect for it and getting great results, I am becoming the most sought-after scouting list by the community. One algorithm factoring players playing in different leagues, different quality of linemates, different internal competition for ice time, different age, different size, different skill set, different goal assists ratio, with/without tournament play, factoring 3 years, etc, I pulled it off. No background in math, just pure reasoning and experimental tries. It is fucking precise now, does better than myself looking at the player play and looking at stats alone.

The end results look something like that it factors both scouting evaluations of attributes and analytics. Gives you a final score, with score for each last 3 seasons of play and even tells you what style of player the prospect is.


That's a small part of the algorithm to give you an idea, I grinded that shit out.

That is definitely dedication and impressive, i'm not trying to discourage you because it would be a fun thing to do anyway.

But realize that when you already have the outcome, you can change your model in anyway to fit it, this is especially true with baseball statistics. You can do this multiple times until you find an answer that you want, but not align with reality, especially with predictive modelling. There's a lot of issue with this but you can definitely try to do it.

Btw, the software probably going to be half-serious and half not taking itself seriously. If it is too serious I doubt it could be as popular. The dating scene is a joke in of itself. My target demographic is probably the young adults which might have somewhat got himself into the red pill ideologies and which don't take this as seriously as people on this forum. I think most people would fuck around with a software of that sort.

if that's the case then you're free to do whatever you want, it can be like Inspirobot where it supposed to give people uplifting advice but tell them to kill themselves instead

 

[ControlledInsanity]

I've always wondered why tinder didn't have a smv score so it can show the person to whom they'd be best suited.

Because that wouldn't be profitable.

 

[Dude420]

But realize that when you already have the outcome, you can change your model in anyway to fit it, this is especially true with baseball statistics. You can do this multiple times until you find an answer that you want, but not align with reality, especially with predictive modelling. There's a lot of issue with this but you can definitely try to do it.

We also already have the outcome here, not sure what you mean, we know what is unattractive and what isn't, it is more objectively clear than the data I had to work with, in fact, it seems less challenging than what I already have done.

How I see it
Like height 5'5 -> Score 35/100. Max final score 68/100. Strong jawline -> IF(Size score below 40 and strong jaw-line, add 8 bonus, IF(Size score between 40 and 60 and strong jawline, add bonus 6.5, etc, etc) now 43/100, next attribute, next attribute, etc. Doesn't need to be that much complicated than that in my view.
Is this overly simplistic, I don't see why I would make it more complicated? There are going to be a shit tone of what if scenarios the rest seems like basic maths to me.

if that's the case then you're free to do whatever you want, it can be like Inspirobot where it supposed to give people uplifting advice but tell them to kill themselves instead

Yeah the cynicism is what will make the program not taken too seriously/kind of funny by default in my view. That's why I will probably tend towards a red pill perspective to give hope to the pleb.

 

[Void]

We also already have the outcome here, not sure what you mean, we know what is unattractive and what isn't, it is more objectively clear than the data I had to work with, in fact, it seems less challenging than what I already have done.

How I see it
Like height 5'5 -> Score 35/100. Max score 68/100. Strong jawline -> IF(Size score below 40 and strong jaw-line, add 8 bonus, IF(Size score between 40 and 60 and strong jawline, add bonus 6.5, etc, etc) now 43/100, next attribute, next attribute, etc. Doesn't need to be that much complicated than that in my view.
Is this overly simplistic, I don't see why I would make it more complicated? There are going to be a shit tone of what if scenarios the rest seems like basic maths to me.

When you get to choose your own parameters and coefficients, you can do the heck you want. Yeah, it would be fine if it's not serious and you don't want to use anymore math.

Since you are ultimately giving them a single number, it should be enough. If you are thinking about adding things like how long a relationship last, chance of dating then it would be more difficult. Though it MIGHT simple if you make your own system with two outcomes as a result.

 

[Dude420]

When you get to choose your own parameters and coefficients, you can do the heck you want. Yeah, it would be fine if it's not serious and you don't want to use anymore math.

Since you are ultimately giving them a single number, it should be enough. If you are thinking about adding things like how long a relationship last, chance of dating then it would be more difficult. Though it MIGHT simple if you make your own system with two outcomes as a result.

Super easy to make it simple.

SMV MAN - SMV WOMAN = X
(I would probably add some little stuff but again basic stuff with what if slight adjustment)

When approaching.
IF X < 0, no chance of anything.
IF 0 < X < 5, might listen to you talk, depending on the scenario.
...
IF X > 45, you can go directly for the kiss.

Long term relationship
SMV MAN - SMV WOMAN(multiply by the number of partners in the past/100/(Age - 16)^.9 (I mean you can add some other stuff but doesn't need to be more complicated than previous stuff)+ 1) = X
Anything you can factor in you just add in, adjusted in the right proportion, test different stuff see if it makes sense, makes adjustments, that's how I did with the other algorithm.

If X > ... divorce rape
...

What do you had in mind? What complex mathematical models would you use?

 

[Void]

Super easy to make it simple.

SMV MAN - SMV WOMAN = X
(I would probably add some little stuff but again basic stuff with what if slight adjustment)

When approaching.
IF X < 0, no chance of anything.
IF 0 < X < 5, might listen to you talk, depending on the scenario.
...
IF X > 45, you can go directly for the kiss.

Long term relationship
SMV MAN - SMV WOMAN(multiply by the number of partners in the past/100/(Age - 16)^.9 (I mean you can add some other stuff but doesn't need to be more complicated than previous stuff)+ 1) = X
Anything you can factor in you just add in, adjusted in the right proportion, test different stuff see if it makes sense, makes adjustments, that's how I did with the other algorithm.

If X > ... divorce rape
...

What do you had in mind? What complex mathematical models would you use?

I don't even know what I would use lmao. Because these models would only matter if you already have data and are used for statistics and machine learning.

It can be as complex or simple as you want, as long as you get your result in this case.

 

[Dude420]

I don't even know what I would use lmao. Because these models would only matter if you already have data and are used for statistics and machine learning.

It can be as complex or simple as you want, as long as you get your result in this case.

Yeah this is not some tech company, i'll try to do it as well as I can but in the end it will probably turn out for the most part into a dumb SMV meme stuff, just because the questions are weird, like do you have recessed chin? People won't see the math anyway and I think I can achieve good results with my methodology like I did it in the past, I know well how the different factors impact the SMV, I just need to translate it into simple formulas. People who have limited knowledge might find it interesting if they are open-minded. I can create the algorithm in a couple of weeks honestly, then a couple more weeks for programming it (would need help there), building the website and adding some stuff and making it look good. The question is not can I do it, the question is it worth it? If I can generate traffic I can always put adds and stuff. I think people would like to mess around with that type of stuff, but it isn't the type of thing you will come back to many times.

 

[Void]

Yeah this is not some tech company, i'll try to do it as well as I can but in the end it will probably turn out for the most part into a dumb SMV meme stuff, just because the questions are weird, like do you have recessed chin? People won't see the math anyway and I think I can achieve good results with my methodology like I did it in the past, I know well how the different factors impact the SMV, I just need to translate it into simple formulas. People who have limited knowledge might find it interesting if they are open-minded. I can create the algorithm in a couple of weeks honestly, then a couple more weeks for programming it (would need help there), building the website and adding some stuff and making it look good. The question is not can I do it, the question is it worth it? If I can generate traffic I can always put adds and stuff. I think people would like to mess around with that type of stuff, but it isn't the type of thing you will come back to many times.

It'll either be funny and we can get a laugh out of it, or inceltears and shit taking it too seriously and use it as "evidence" on how we're using pseudoscience.

Up to you really, i think people here will appreciate it if you add a couple of jokes or catchphrases like "it's over"

 

[Blue Squirtle]

I am thinking about programming a software that would help people figure out their SMV (particularly helping people who aren't as familiar with black pill ideologies)
It would ask questions about your height, ethnicity, body shape, jawline, money, etc which would give you a final SMV score, placing you in the SMV graph (age related).
The software would then tell you what reactions you would get if you were to approach women of different SMV.
Then you could be more precise about women, enter their similar information about age, height, etc + how slutty she seems to be (how many partners in the past)
On top of the chance of attracting her, it would then tell you how long the relationship would last on average, the chances of being cheated, risks of you were to marry her (divorce rape), etc.
I thinking about giving black pill related info all the way through the questionnaire, showcasing the relevancy of each question.
But it would probably be a hybrid red pill/black pill app, probably mainly camouflage as red pill because it has a bigger reach (and it has a brighter PUA side, and people like hope, it won't all be Incels responding so there is hope for them anyway)
Not sure if app or website yet. If it were an app it probably it might be infringing on some policies.

Do you think this type of app/software could be popular, do you believe I should go through with it? If so why?

Btw I have been studying Evolutionary Psychology extensively and I consume a great deal of red pill/black pill content, so I have a very good grasp of how all of those factors interact with SMV.

In order for it to work accurately it would need a lot of information, but I think it could work, go for it. BTW it will be mocked.

 

[Dude420]

In order for it to work accurately it would need a lot of information, but I think it could work, go for it. BTW it will be mocked.

I wonder if that's where the potential lies, being taken as a joke, and people start sharing it because it is funny, cynical and absurd, but at the same time they know there are ounces of truths which makes it all even weirder. Maybe I should aim at exploiting that.

 

[Blue Squirtle]

I wonder if that's where the potential lies, being taken as a joke, and people start sharing it because it is funny, cynical and absurd, but at the same time they know there are ounces of truths which makes it all even weirder. Maybe I should aim at exploiting that.

I think lots of people would use it as a gag, but then realize it's true.

 

[Dude420]

I think lots of people would use it as a gag, but then realize it's true.

Maybe we could awaken some fellow incels to the reality they are facing.

 

[Hail The Bloatlord]

I would use it

 

[theoldnick]

I am thinking about programming a software that would help people figure out their SMV (particularly helping people who aren't as familiar with black pill ideologies)
It would ask questions about your height, ethnicity, body shape, jawline, money, etc which would give you a final SMV score, placing you in the SMV graph (age related).
The software would then tell you what reactions you would get if you were to approach women of different SMV.
Then you could be more precise about women, enter their similar information about age, height, etc + how slutty she seems to be (how many partners in the past)
On top of the chance of attracting her, it would then tell you how long the relationship would last on average, the chances of being cheated, risks of you were to marry her (divorce rape), etc.
I thinking about giving black pill related info all the way through the questionnaire, showcasing the relevancy of each question.
But it would probably be a hybrid red pill/black pill app, probably mainly camouflage as red pill because it has a bigger reach (and it has a brighter PUA side, and people like hope, it won't all be Incels responding so there is hope for them anyway)
Not sure if app or website yet. If it were an app it probably it might be infringing on some policies.

Do you think this type of app/software could be popular, do you believe I should go through with it? If so why?

Btw I have been studying Evolutionary Psychology extensively and I consume a great deal of red pill/black pill content, so I have a very good grasp of how all of those factors interact with SMV.

the mirror is a good program

 

[Brahcel]

I am thinking about programming a software that would help people figure out their SMV (particularly helping people who aren't as familiar with black pill ideologies)
It would ask questions about your height, ethnicity, body shape, jawline, money, etc which would give you a final SMV score, placing you in the SMV graph (age related).
The software would then tell you what reactions you would get if you were to approach women of different SMV.
Then you could be more precise about women, enter their similar information about age, height, etc + how slutty she seems to be (how many partners in the past)
On top of the chance of attracting her, it would then tell you how long the relationship would last on average, the chances of being cheated, risks of you were to marry her (divorce rape), etc.
I thinking about giving black pill related info all the way through the questionnaire, showcasing the relevancy of each question.
But it would probably be a hybrid red pill/black pill app, probably mainly camouflage as red pill because it has a bigger reach (and it has a brighter PUA side, and people like hope, it won't all be Incels responding so there is hope for them anyway)
Not sure if app or website yet. If it were an app it probably it might be infringing on some policies.

Do you think this type of app/software could be popular, do you believe I should go through with it? If so why?

Btw I have been studying Evolutionary Psychology extensively and I consume a great deal of red pill/black pill content, so I have a very good grasp of how all of those factors interact with SMV.

Have a feeling it will go viral and be in the news. Like that make up remover app
But better so do it

 

[Fontaine]

It will probably get banned from all app stores once the media start talking about it, so you better monetize it from the start

 

[Dude420]

It will probably get banned from all app stores once the media start talking about it, so you better monetize it from the start

It might not even be accepted to be launch, I would concentrate on just building the program on a website, a lot safer.

I might even be infringing the app store first rule? (even though I would be using scientific facts)
1.1 Objectionable Content
Apps should not include content that is offensive, insensitive, upsetting, intended to disgust, or in exceptionally poor taste. Examples of such content include:

• 1.1.1 Defamatory, discriminatory, or mean-spirited content, including references or commentary about religion, race, sexual orientation, gender, national/ethnic origin, or other targeted groups, particularly if the app is likely to humiliate, intimidate, or place a targeted individual or group in harm’s way. Professional political satirists and humorists are generally exempt from this requirement.

 

[Dude420]

I am going to do it boys, I am fucking pumped, will seem edgy, but that's because the truth will shock/hurt the plebs, the feminists will rage, I think it has viral potential. All my free time goes into that project from now on.

 

[TakeTheBlackPill]

I am going to do it boys, I am fucking pumped, will seem edgy, but that's because the truth will shock/hurt the plebs, the feminists will feel rage, I think it has viral potential. All my free time goes into that project from now on.

Don’t factor ethnicity that much
Black guys get laid

 

[Dude420]

Don’t factor ethnicity that much
Black guys get laid

Every value I will use will be back up by researches
https://incels.is/attachments/scree...t-word-feliciano-paa2008-doc-80046-png.17428/
https://incels.is/attachments/racisswhitewomen-png.17431/

Black rank pretty highly in terms of ethnicity.

 

[TakeTheBlackPill]

Every value I will use will be back up by researches
https://incels.is/attachments/scree...t-word-feliciano-paa2008-doc-80046-png.17428/
https://incels.is/attachments/racisswhitewomen-png.17431/

Black rank pretty highly in terms of ethnicity.

The dating data from okcupid is bullshit, if you analyze the demographics you would see that it’s 90% composed of white males in 2009, but there’s only 60% white males in 2009. All the chad ethnics are busy slaying out there and don’t have to resort to dating apps unlike whites