RoboticSubHuman
Subhuman monstrosity
★★
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
- Posts
- 158
Which political ideology do you subscribe to and why?
Realistically you can't be a Marxist Liberal or a Fascist Anarchist. If you don't care enough about politics to view it as anything more than cope then your ideology isn't really meaningful.Why can't i choose multiple options?
Bit i wanted conservative marxistRealistically you can't be a Marxist Liberal or a Fascist Anarchist. If you don't care enough about politics to view it as anything more than cope then your ideology isn't really meaningful.
Like a social conservative Marxist? That's covered under Marxist/ Communism. I.E. Stalinism was social conservative Marxism. If you mean "free market capitalist" conservative then being a conservative marxist makes no sense.Bit i wanted conservative marxist
Why is this anonymous wtf?Like a social conservative Marxist? That's covered under Marxist/ Communism. I.E. Stalinism was social conservative Marxism. If you mean "free market capitalist" conservative then being a conservative marxist makes no sense.
Interesting. I've wanted to read Hoppe but haven't got around to it. Very true about Marxism. It's interesting but national, racial, and other struggles likely come before class struggle.I find compelling many things of marxism-leninism/maoism like national liberation and anti-imperialism. In a neutral way, I also acknowledge the existence of the class struggle.
But it’s undeniable that Marxism-Leninism lost the Cold War, it was a huge hit.
I also think that an ideal world would be something like Hans-Hermann Hope described as ‘private law society’.
Even though many libertarians spout the stupid idea that USA was found on ‘freedom’(what about the slaves, indentured servants and the natives?), and other dumb things, the core ideas of that ideology convinced me.
Conclusion: I find Marxism-leninism a compelling ideology but I find the libertarian ‘private law society’ better.
Based and UnabomberpilledAnarcho premitivism with minimal technology while laughing at this clown world
I find compelling many things of marxism-leninism/maoism like national liberation and anti-imperialism. In a neutral way, I also acknowledge the existence of the class struggle.
But it’s undeniable that Marxism-Leninism lost the Cold War, it was a huge hit.
I also think that an ideal world would be something like Hans-Hermann Hope described as ‘private law society’.
Even though many libertarians spout the stupid idea that USA was found on ‘freedom’(what about the slaves, indentured servants and the natives?), and other dumb things, the core ideas of that ideology convinced me.
Conclusion: I find Marxism-leninism a compelling ideology but I find the libertarian ‘private law society’ better.
If you are an ugly male literally every single one of them will fuck you over.