this is the argument for allowing sex select of babies even if it's the firstborn. we all see it. his life is obviously going to be abnormally and unfairly difficult. it's cruel to not let in the know mothers sex select if they know their son will be labeled as a bad, or evil person just for his looks, and having it effect his personality.
this is an important picture.
incels should advocate and champion easing the restrictions and/or providing access to and/or implementing and making legal sex selection for female babies, even if it's the firstborn child: maybe keeping the restriction and not allowing someone to sex select a firstborn male and leaving it to chance is required to avoid a sex imbalance. their could even be more comprehensive and sensible rules. it theoretically COULD cause a sex imbalance, but men like this will be very likely to have a life of unnecessary suffering if they aren't born as a female; A girl. I know even if this person or others like them at risk may still experience suffering in their lives, but their would be hope and an incentive to pursue happiness, and strive to be a better person.
. were my political activist cels at?
I feel very strongly about this. the conversation is always ongoing about abortion and many other things, and it is seen as normal. no one tells men they can't donate. no one tells women they can't use the fertility clinic banks. I believe in most places a male or female can choose to marry whomever they want, and all these conversations and political debates are seen as normal and necessary. why isn't this being debated and talked about? their's a real chance to give women who know what is best for their future children the ability to limit the suffering of her offspring with sex selection. a mother would know what the best life would be for her future children. let's have less suffering in the world by finding ways to use sex selection technology in an environmentally friendly way.
this is an important picture.
incels should advocate and champion easing the restrictions and/or providing access to and/or implementing and making legal sex selection for female babies, even if it's the firstborn child: maybe keeping the restriction and not allowing someone to sex select a firstborn male and leaving it to chance is required to avoid a sex imbalance. their could even be more comprehensive and sensible rules. it theoretically COULD cause a sex imbalance, but men like this will be very likely to have a life of unnecessary suffering if they aren't born as a female; A girl. I know even if this person or others like them at risk may still experience suffering in their lives, but their would be hope and an incentive to pursue happiness, and strive to be a better person.
. were my political activist cels at?I feel very strongly about this. the conversation is always ongoing about abortion and many other things, and it is seen as normal. no one tells men they can't donate. no one tells women they can't use the fertility clinic banks. I believe in most places a male or female can choose to marry whomever they want, and all these conversations and political debates are seen as normal and necessary. why isn't this being debated and talked about? their's a real chance to give women who know what is best for their future children the ability to limit the suffering of her offspring with sex selection. a mother would know what the best life would be for her future children. let's have less suffering in the world by finding ways to use sex selection technology in an environmentally friendly way.
Last edited:
