Please update the rules

[incel4life]

The mod proudweeb deleted my post and gave me a 30% warning for arguing for a lower age of consent. This is not against the stated rules. Please update the rules to say that it is forbidden to argue in favor of lowering the sacred age of consent, so that future posters don't waste their time.

 

[user]

I'm pretty sure that falls under the category of "Do not sexualize minors in any way, shape, or form."

 

[justuseless]

Roasties are sacred innocent kweens

But fr mods have to cover their asses

 

[Animecel2D]

 

[incel4life]

I'm pretty sure that falls under the category of "Do not sexualize minors in any way, shape, or form."

It's sexualizing minors to say the age of consent should be lowered? What does "sexualize" even mean?

 

[BSGMANLET]

It's sexualizing minors to say the age of consent should be lowered? What does "sexualize" even mean?

What age are we talking? 16?

 

[incel4life]

What age are we talking? 16?

What difference does it make? I won't say the number because morons will say that I advocate sex at that age, because they don't understand that wanting to repeal a certain law doesn't mean that you advocate the thing it bans.

My argument was age of consent past a point is basically a bogus concept because girls mature at different rates. So the age of consent should be set to something low, and then more subjective laws should cover the in between cases.

 

[BSGMANLET]

What difference does it make? I won't say the number because morons will say that I advocate sex at that age, because they don't understand that wanting to repeal a certain law doesn't mean that you advocate the thing it bans.

My argument was age of consent past a point is basically a bogus concept because girls mature at different rates. So the age of consent should be set to something low, and then more subjective laws should cover the in between cases.

If the age of consent went down. There'd probably be more cases of grape. I understand where your coming from though and even if young foids have sex at an early age.That doesn't make it right

 

[Emba]

Incels are in control over national consent age laws... Therefore, keep asking us to change those laws

 

[starystulejarz]

Mods are agecucks. They want for Chads to deflower all teen foids but not us. Foids can easily start having sex when they are 12-14 and it happens all the time so why age of consent is much higher? They don't protect anyone but subhumans from having sex with prime staceys, they don't want us to pair bound with a foid (since it's a made up "grooming) they don't want anyone to create families they want for Chad to have fun with them, disregard them instantly and ruin them forever. Fuck chad and fuck kikes controlling our soyciety.

 

[incel4life]

Mods are agecucks. They want for Chads to deflower all teen foids but not us. Foids can easily start having sex when they are 12-14 and it happens all the time so why age of consent is much higher? They don't protect anyone but subhumans from having sex with prime staceys, they don't want us to pair bound with a foid (since it's a made up "grooming) they don't want anyone to create families they want for Chad to have fun with them, disregard them instantly and ruin them forever. Fuck chad and fuck kikes controlling our soyciety.

Yeah in high school the only way a male can have status is by being a fucking football player. By restricting the dating pool to high school aged boys, soyciety ensures that high school girls only have sex with football players. I should stop posting now before the soy mods ban me.