Holy fuck! The last time I've seen so many loli fanboys in one place was 10 years ago when I worked at a public library and realized that Nabokov's friday night sessions had a 80% male attendance. But I'm not in the mood to judge, can't do it after a bad trip anyway. Incels can be described as many things, but fascist is barely one of them, as this forum is filled with sex obsessed libertines who never had the chance to live it out, hopeless romantics and cynical realists. Hardly a bunch to pull off a beer hall putch.
And while hebebphilia is now synonymous with pedos, creepy ice cream men and hypocritical conservatives, what leftists omit is that the battle to abolish consent laws was led and fought by renowned members of the cultural left in the 1960s. Foucault started a petition against these laws and convinced half of the french radical intelligentsia to sign it. Deleuze and Guatari wrote a book describing the history of western civilization as nothing but a succession of cock-crushing celibate practices, and Simone De Bavior convinced Sartre that having sex with his teen students was revolutionary praxis.
Still think that pinkpill feminism draws from this 'degenerate' tradition? Take a second look at it. Already in the late 1980s radical feminists joined Jesus Freaks in their denunciation of pornography, lewd language and sexual objectification. For MacKinnon male sexuality was predatory and violent, for Dworkin all heterosexual intercourse was rape. In the 1960s telling a 17 year old girl she that she's a child, too young to be riding around with her outlaw biker boyfriend, you'd be uttering a bigoted idea about female autonomy. In 2020 the pinkpilled feminist explains to a 21 year old woman that her boyfriend is a pedophile for dating someone with a underdeveloped prefrontal cortex.
So what is so fascist about the pink pill feminism? Besides a eugenicist promotion to human sexuality? -- It's inert contradictions: the frantic self-celebration of it's alleged greatness and superiority over men, that is juxtaposed with a relapse into infantilism (muh cortex), victimhood (((the patriarhcy)))) and scapegoating (nice guys™).
And while hebebphilia is now synonymous with pedos, creepy ice cream men and hypocritical conservatives, what leftists omit is that the battle to abolish consent laws was led and fought by renowned members of the cultural left in the 1960s. Foucault started a petition against these laws and convinced half of the french radical intelligentsia to sign it. Deleuze and Guatari wrote a book describing the history of western civilization as nothing but a succession of cock-crushing celibate practices, and Simone De Bavior convinced Sartre that having sex with his teen students was revolutionary praxis.
Still think that pinkpill feminism draws from this 'degenerate' tradition? Take a second look at it. Already in the late 1980s radical feminists joined Jesus Freaks in their denunciation of pornography, lewd language and sexual objectification. For MacKinnon male sexuality was predatory and violent, for Dworkin all heterosexual intercourse was rape. In the 1960s telling a 17 year old girl she that she's a child, too young to be riding around with her outlaw biker boyfriend, you'd be uttering a bigoted idea about female autonomy. In 2020 the pinkpilled feminist explains to a 21 year old woman that her boyfriend is a pedophile for dating someone with a underdeveloped prefrontal cortex.
So what is so fascist about the pink pill feminism? Besides a eugenicist promotion to human sexuality? -- It's inert contradictions: the frantic self-celebration of it's alleged greatness and superiority over men, that is juxtaposed with a relapse into infantilism (muh cortex), victimhood (((the patriarhcy)))) and scapegoating (nice guys™).
