Discussion Physiological Monogamy vs Emotional Monogamy

[Deleted member 16390]

Reminder this has always been the natural order of things before modern technology and practices such as contraceptives, medical abortions , welfare from the states etc...


Foids are naturally physiological monogamous given the fact that their biological role and purpose in life is motherhood.

In the state of pregnancy and gestation period of 9months , she is physically hampered but still have to be responsible for herself and her offspring.
Therefore , she is dependent on the father who procreated the child to protect and provide her with resources.
The average man only have enough time, skills , and energy to provide for himself, a woman, and the resulting child /children.

So the man must choose who to commit 100% of his emotion and commitment to make children.
the foid must secure the emotional commitment of one man to provide her with children.
Both want children, because children is basically your wealth once they come of age.
People are needed to work the Earth to extract its resources to maintain life and improve quality of life.

now a man is not physiologically bound nor dependent to anyone since he is not hampered by childbearing.
a man can go on to make hundreds and thousands of babies for years on end the natural way, not even counting modern sperm banks.

Therefore a foid must prove herself worthy and responsible to win a man emotional commitment.
usually this mean being a virgin and having good domestic skills.

a foid will sacrifice having the total emotional commitment of one man and be in a harem of a wealthy man just because her desire for children/wealth over ride everything.
she is willing to have just 10% of emotional commitment from a man who have 10 wives, or even none at all.

A wealthy and virile king can have upward of hundreds of wives and thousands of children while only devoting 100% of his emotional commitment to 1 wife or no emotional attachment to any of them. He just let his wealth take care of everyone.


the most profilic foid recorded is a russian peasant
27 births =69 children
her husband had 2 wives
27 births = 69 children
8 births =18 children

my excoworker tell me about her uncle who is a married Tyrone with children, he also make babies with random foids at every stop over the years and they stop counting when at 50 bastards, it may very well in the 100's....

not uncommon for a few wealthy Mormon men back in the days to have double digit wives and each wive having double digit children.

Now generally , which group do you think is more emotional/physically monogamous?

 

[Deleted member 21230]

Idc it should be 1 man for every woman and 1 woman for every man. Everything else is degeneracy

 

[Theorist]

It's interesting to add, across the mammal species, most of them AFAIK don't even have the father hanging around. He bangs the female then bounces and the female takes care of all the offspring

 

[SupremeG]

Idc it should be 1 man for every woman and 1 woman for every man. Everything else is degeneracy

It should be also only 1-2 children max.

 

[Deleted member 16390]

It should be also only 1-2 children max.

how is this sustainable, a couple need at least 2.1 children just to replace population.
north americans birthrate for whitey foids have been under 2.1 for several decades now.

one of my grandfather had 13 children with his 1st wife, my grandmother, she died and he married the housekeeper.
he then had another 12 or 13 with the 2nd wife.

 

[SupremeG]

how is this sustainable, a couple need at least 2.1 children just to replace population.
north americans birthrate for whitey foids have been under 2.1 for several decades now.

one of my grandfather had 13 children with his 1st wife, my grandmother, she died and he married the housekeeper.
he then had another 12 or 13 with the 2nd wife.

Too many children overpopulate the country. Whites women have only 1 child on average and ethnic toilets have 3-4 in Europe. To stop the flooding, couples should only have a limited number of children. Not sure how it is in America.

 

[Theorist]

how is this sustainable, a couple need at least 2.1 children just to replace population.
north americans birthrate for whitey foids have been under 2.1 for several decades now.

one of my grandfather had 13 children with his 1st wife, my grandmother, she died and he married the housekeeper.
he then had another 12 or 13 with the 2nd wife.

Imo the world needs to drastically reduce in size population-wise. We could use some lower birth rates

 

[Deleted member 21883]

At least long term karma will prevail, as societies that screw over their people and cheat them out of a normal life will be overrun when their birth-depleted population can no longer hold the territory.