"Personality rights" and "Image rights" need to be abolished.

[Klaus Kanga II]

"Personality rights" are yet another way for women and feminist cuck men to excercise control.

Thanks to "personality rights", men can not collect evidence of their innocence, making them defenseless against false rape accusations (Horst Arnold story). Thanks to "personality rights", misbehaving feminist protesters can not be exposed. Thanks to "personality rights", people who abuse their authority (like school teachers) can not be exposed online for doing so, so there are no consequences for their bad behaviour.

I hope you realize at this point that "personality rights" are disguised censorship.

---

During a class trip, J., a female classmate [resisting urge to drop her name] didn't like appearing on photographs I made only to preserve the memories, not to publish them anywhere. I never pointed my phone camera directly at her, and she wasn't even in revealing clothes. She happened to appear at the edge of some of the pictures I took to have a memory of the trip. At the same time, she didn't mind appearing on Snapchat stories by her female friends, and exposing herself on Instagram.

She often whined "Rechte am eigenen Bild, Rechte am eigenen Bild!" (Image rights) at me, even though this is a class trip, and she has to either expect appearing on photographs or keep her arse home!

The exact same girl doesn't mind exposing herself like this on her public Instagram profile with over 1000 followers:

(Her face is visible on the original, but I cropped it out or blurred it just to be on the safe side. This is not a privacy violation, the pictures are public right now on her Instagram profile.)

Textbook attention whore. If you don't already know, women crave attention in a similar way men crave sex. But due to Instagram and other social media, women have access to unlimited attention. There is no equality in this world.

 

[anotherwastedlife]

Preserve those memory photos, shes a dumb whore who doesn't even know how copyright works

 

[decafincel]

Brutal. Image rights is an interesting concept, here in the US you can record phone calls in some states without the other person's consent.

 

[Stupid Clown]

All laws exist to pander to women. It's pathetic and why I don't take laws seriously. They're nothing more than silly rules made up by baffoons with big sticks. Very high quality post btw

Enjoyed reading it

 

[Stupid Clown]

Reading that case was infuriating

 

[Klaus Kanga II]

All laws exist to pander to women.

And billionaires.

[…] the law exists for the purpose of keeping the current power structure where the really high ups can do everything, while the plebs at the very bottom exist only to be enslaved and abused.

(source: The Enemy Who Surpasses The Law)

Also, so-called "personality rights" might prevent cheating whores from being exposed.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk
Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead (mirror)

That dude did the right thing. Cheaters deserve to be exposed online, but I am guessing what he did is illegal in some other places.

If the law prevents cheating whores from being exposed for what they are, dare I say it, the law is wrong.

Very high quality post btw

Enjoyed reading it

Thanks much!

 

[Damkiller]

Good lord, that shit is more scary than a horror game. This case just sounds like good horror movie not as real showcase of real world

 

[Damkiller]

That doesn't even sound real, more like a american creepypasta. Don't say this is 100% real

 

[Klaus Kanga II]

Good lord, that shit is more scary than a horror game. This case just sounds like good horror movie not as real showcase of real world

That doesn't even sound real, more like a american creepypasta. Don't say this is 100% real

Do you mean the original post or the "Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead" video?

 

[Damkiller]

Do you mean the original post or the "Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead" video?

Orginal post

 

[Klaus Kanga II]

Reading that case was infuriating

That doesn't even sound real, more like a american creepypasta. Don't say this is 100% real

I have something even worse.

Here is German horror story. And it is not fictional.

---

Law enforcement officials got sick of being held accountable by plebians and their video cameras, so they had to find a way to fool people into happily accepting censorship of law enforcement officials.

In 2017, the state sponsored the production of a propaganda movie that pictured people who film officials as stupid "gawkers", "sensationalists", and "privacy violators".

This is the movie:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI
Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer

Besides the million views on YouTube, this four-minute short film was broadcast on mainstream television.

It worked. The propaganda film fooled millions of people into believing that filming officials is bad and an "infringement of personality rights", so they happily agreed on the ban on filming police and other officials.

As a result, any physical abuse by authorities will stay in the dark. We don't hear about it.

In future, they can force pedestrians to wear masks and take vaccines, and you are not allowed to film it, much less post it online. The state can happily surveil us citizens while we are not allowed to film officials. It's only considered a "privacy violation" when us plebians do it, not when the state does it.

[I hereby release this post and the original post in this thread into the public domain, as described in CC0 1.0.]

 

[Stupid Clown]

I have something even worse.

Here is German horror story. And it is not fictional.

---

Law enforcement officials got sick of being held accountable by plebians and their video cameras, so they had to find a way to fool people into happily accepting censorship of law enforcement officials.

In 2017, the state sponsored the production of a propaganda movie that pictured people who film officials as stupid "gawkers", "sensationalists", and "privacy violators".

This is the movie:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI
Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer

Besides the million views on YouTube, this four-minute short film was broadcast on mainstream television.

It worked. The propaganda film fooled millions of people into believing that filming officials is bad and an "infringement of personality rights", so they happily agreed on the ban on filming police and other officials.

As a result, any physical abuse by authorities will stay in the dark. We don't hear about it.

In future, they can force pedestrians to wear masks and take vaccines, and you are not allowed to film it, much less post it online. The state can happily surveil us citizens while we are not allowed to film officials. It's only considered a "privacy violation" when us plebians do it, not when the state does it.

[I hereby release this post and the original post in this thread into the public domain, as described in CC0 1.0.]

Germany is such a shit hole. Hopefully, there's an economic crash that leads to some form of mass chaos.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Reading that case was infuriating

A brutal story.

 

[Damkiller]

I have something even worse.

Here is German horror story. And it is not fictional.

---

Law enforcement officials got sick of being held accountable by plebians and their video cameras, so they had to find a way to fool people into happily accepting censorship of law enforcement officials.

In 2017, the state sponsored the production of a propaganda movie that pictured people who film officials as stupid "gawkers", "sensationalists", and "privacy violators".

This is the movie:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI
Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer

Besides the million views on YouTube, this four-minute short film was broadcast on mainstream television.

It worked. The propaganda film fooled millions of people into believing that filming officials is bad and an "infringement of personality rights", so they happily agreed on the ban on filming police and other officials.

As a result, any physical abuse by authorities will stay in the dark. We don't hear about it.

In future, they can force pedestrians to wear masks and take vaccines, and you are not allowed to film it, much less post it online. The state can happily surveil us citizens while we are not allowed to film officials. It's only considered a "privacy violation" when us plebians do it, not when the state does it.

[I hereby release this post and the original post in this thread into the public domain, as described in CC0 1.0.]

looking at the video, I fell like people watching this had zero thought about it. it wasn't bad that he recorded it, rather than how unseriously he treated whole situationship. suprizingly everything except recording was bad, so proably for me messeage is simple, don't go where you shouldn't be going. not banning recoding,

 

[Klaus Kanga II]

it wasn't bad that he recorded it, rather than how unseriously he treated whole situationship. suprizingly everything except recording was bad, so proably for me messeage is simple, don't go where you shouldn't be going. not banning recoding,

Indeed, but the propaganda movie makes the impression that any harmless filming will escalate to stepping on the crash site.

And the illegality isn't the only problem. Thanks to this propaganda, filming police and other officials is not even culturally accepted. The average person here in Germany considers someone who films authorities as a crazy "gawker" and "sensationalist", as intended by the propaganda.

Someone who tries to film authorities would face resistance by brainwashed NPCs. It's considered culturally inappropriate as a result of the propaganda campaign.

 

[Karakol96]

All rights need to be abolished

 

[Damkiller]

Indeed, but the propaganda movie makes the impression that any harmless filming will escalate to stepping on the crash site.

And the illegality isn't the only problem. Thanks to this propaganda, filming police and other officials is not even culturally accepted. The average person here in Germany considers someone who films authorities as a crazy "gawker" and "sensationalist", as intended by the propaganda.

Someone who tries to film authorities would face resistance by brainwashed NPCs. It's considered culturally inappropriate as a result of the propaganda campaign.

Don't say just one video was enough, that's absoluty insane

 

[Klaus Kanga II]

Don't say just one video was enough, that's absoluty insane

It wasn't, but it was a major contributor.

Something that might have kickstarted it: The police department of Hagen posted this to Facebook in April 2016: "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" ("Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!").

Then, magically, major news outlets picked up on it and spread it:

Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“

In Hagen haben Schaulustige massiv einen Rettungseinsatz behindert. Die Polizei wandte sich daraufhin via Facebook mit einem emotionalen Appell an die

rp-online.de

Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige

Weil Hunderte Schaulustige einen Rettungseinsatz in Hagen behindert haben, wird die Polizei nun deutlich. Im Internet schlägt die Aktion hohe Wellen.

www.n-tv.de

Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!"

Hagen - Die Polizei Hagen hat nach einem Unfall am Mittwochnachmittag auf ihrer Facebook-Seite einen Beitrag mit dem Titel "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" gepostet.

www.tz.de

"Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!"

In Hagen in NRW läuft ein Mädchen bei Rot über die Straße und verunglückt schwer. Als der Krankenwagen da ist, machen die Passanten Videos mit dem Handy. Und behindern die Rettungssanitäter. Der Polizei platzt der Kragen - und veröffentlicht ein deutliches Posting bei Facebook.

www.bayern3.de

"Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer

"Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer!" Weil Hunderte Schaulustige einen Rettungseinsatz in Hagen behindert haben, wird die Polizei nun deutlich. Im Internet schlägt die Aktion hohe Wellen.

www.augsburger-allgemeine.de

Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“

„Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer!“ Weil Hunderte Schaulustige einen Rettungseinsatz in Hagen behindert haben, wird die Polizei nun deutlich.

www.noz.de

It almost seems that they are all controlled by a common entity. This is not just my observation. The same happened in 2020 during the plandemic.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox
Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION by Mikki Willis

(15:53)
And there it is. Only what they want us to see.

In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda.

 

[Klaus Kanga II]

Top comment by an NPC fool from that Facebook post:

Wie wäre es den[n], wenn die Polizei beim nächsten mal einfach kurzerhand die Handys einzieht?
Immerhin haben nicht nur Polizisten, sondern auch Feuerwehrleute, Sanitäter und vor allen Dingen die Unfallopfer ein Recht am eigenen Bild - und wenn ein, zwei Beamte bei der nächsten Gafferrunde erst mal in zehn Minuten so zwanzig bis dreißig Handys einsammeln, wird das mit Sicherheit mehr Effekt haben als jede noch so gut gemeinte Erinnerung an Anstand und Benehmen!

Translated:

How about next time the police simply takes away the bystanders' phones?
After all, not just police officiers but firefighters, paramedics, and crash victims have image rights - and when one or two officiers take away 20 to 30 phones the next time, it will surely be more effective than any well-meaning reminder on decency and order!

(bolded for emphasis)

What he is saying is that people who are serving as public officers should not be held accountable because "muh image rights".

Dude's gonna change his mind the second he is on the receiving end of police brutality. What if police officers punch him for not wearing a suffocation mask, or take away his children and forcibly inject them with poison vaccines?

It will all stay in the dark and no one will believe him (Markus Schneider) because the same people he denounced as "gawkers" will not have been allowed to record it, much less publish it.

Typical bootlicker NPC.

One can safely assume that they censored all comments which disagreed.

---

Germany is such a shit hole.

Actually, it is still much better than some other places on earth (think Syria, Afghanistan, North Korea), but it is still far from ideal.

For example, they explicitly legalized infant circumcision in 2012 (BGB § 1631d) because there are two religions ("protected minorities") which love cutting foreskins from male children. Before that, it was unregulated.

In addition, you need a "broadcasting license" ("Rundfunklizenz") if you want to live stream to more than 500 people on any platform (including YouTube, Twitch), meaning you need government approval. Such a license costs thousands of euros to acquire and you will not get such a license if you report in a way the elites don't like, for example against poison vaccines.