Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Personality is largely genetic too.

ColdLightOfDay

ColdLightOfDay

Serge’s alt.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 18, 2018
Posts
5,704
https://www.bustle.com/articles/199...personality-is-genetic-a-lot-new-science-says

This is why ‘work on yourself’ seems to be such useless advice to me. Normies will say this line incessantly as the cure-all remedy to inceldom. When you still have potential to looksmax they will say it in reference to your appearance. If you are truecel tier they will more likely use the same line but tailored to improving your personality, as in their minds this is a more malleable and less rigid area for self improvement.

The study states; “it seems that extroversion and the tendency to be neurotic are heavily genetically influenced.” And if I’m honest this makes perfect sense to me, emotional intelligence seems to me as much as a genetic trait as good eyesight. When you see someone who is a poor communicator they look truly lost when trying to have people emotionally engage with what they are saying and yet you can also see extroverted kids and even toddlers who love the centre of attention and have an audience (including adults) who hang on their every word and laugh at their every joke. This is why it is clear that intelligence has little to do with effective communication and in fact the your delivery is far more important than the content of your speech.

If it were to become clear that every single one of your traits, from physical attractiveness to temperament and personality are entirely predetermined from the moment of your conception, then maybe humanity would understand that it is not only unfair, but also irrational to pass scrutiny and judgement over individuals based on these variables, which are entirely beyond their control since before even their birth.
 
Looks come first and THEN your personality develops based on how people respond to your looks in society.

-Ugly people develop ugly personalities because of rejection.
-Attractive people develop ugly personalities because they don't have to try hard. ever.
-People in the middle are delusional about their role in society. and so they skew the results.
 
Well you're somewhat right. Personality is genetic however for example if you're born introverted you can learn to be extroverted if you're determined enough but it will never feel natural to be that way.
 
In Islam the concept of destiny قدر mentions everything is predetermined before you were born.
 
In Islam the concept of destiny قدر mentions everything is predetermined before you were born.
Religion is the biggest black-pill. Even the things you call bluepill like marriage is created because they knew of the truth.
 
well your personality doesn't really matter if you don't have the looks right?
its like a cruel joke that nature plays
 
Looks come first and THEN your personality develops based on how people respond to your looks in society.

-Ugly people develop ugly personalities because of rejection.
-Attractive people develop ugly personalities because they don't have to try hard. ever.
-People in the middle are delusional about their role in society. and so they skew the results.
To an extent that is true, yet you see plenty of good-looking people who are naturally bad at expressing themselves but their looks compensate for this and they are still sexually successful. Likewise, there are ugly people who have seemingly defied the odds and are considered extroverted and funny, it gives them a much better chance than an ugly shy person, but they are still miles behind a good-looking person even if they’re shy.
well your personality doesn't really matter if you don't have the looks right?
its like a cruel joke that nature plays
It will help increase your chances a lot, though is not decisive, and the uglier you are the more difficult things become.
 
Looks come first and THEN your personality develops based on how people respond to your looks in society.

-Ugly people develop ugly personalities because of rejection.
-Attractive people develop ugly personalities because they don't have to try hard. ever.
-People in the middle are delusional about their role in society. and so they skew the results.

High IQ.
 
who cares, personality is useless in the real world.
 
I'm pretty sure everyone knew this, but it's very helpful for it to be concluded and confirmed by research that personality is genetic.

So yeah, everything that normies have ever said has been debunked from A to Z. These people are bad thinkers and philosophers and they hate the truth. Honestly, these people are just vile with their lie spreading.
 
I'm pretty sure everyone knew this, but it's very helpful for it to be concluded and confirmed by research that personality is genetic.

So yeah, everything that normies have ever said has been debunked from A to Z. These people are bad thinkers and philosophers and they hate the truth. Honestly, these people are just vile with their lie spreading.
I actually don’t see them as vile, more deluded. I despise human nature but not the humans who are unwittingly forced to function within it’s confines. The same goes for women, though often the behaviour of a Lion may look cruel and at times immoral from the eyes of a gazelle, we know as impartial observers that “morality” doesn’t really come into the question when an animal is merely acting within it’s natural programming. This is how I believe an impartial observer looking down from space would interpret the cruelty evident in human behaviour, which is why I think it’s impractical to involve your emotion and personal situation when assessing the moral implication of a wider issue. As an incel, the only perspective available is that of the gazelle, so of course it would appear cruel and immoral from this point of view, despite the fact it’s really just nature running it’s due course.
 
The spreading of misinformation to delude other humans is malevolent. It's worse if its goal is to keep a normie's positive worldview of "there's a chance for everyone" and "life is beautiful XD".

There's nothing virtuous about women messaging en masse that they like men with respect rather than bad boys, or that ugly men can get dates with Stacies.

Lying has always been antithesis to virtue, and I don't care if you are deluded, that doesn't alleviate the liar's fault, especially if they make little mental effort to know the truth, or if they don't care about the truth at all, which is a serious human defect.
 
The spreading of misinformation to delude other humans is malevolent. It's worse if its goal is to keep a normie's positive worldview of "there's a chance for everyone" and "life is beautiful XD".

There's nothing virtuous about women messaging en masse that they like men with respect rather than bad boys, or that ugly men can get dates with Stacies.

Lying has always been antithesis to virtue, and I don't care if you are deluded, that doesn't alleviate the liar's fault, especially if they make little mental effort to know the truth, or if they don't care about the truth at all, which is a serious human defect.
If you genuinely believe that what you say is the truth then you have not transgressed a moral boundary in my opinion. I believe that women do know, objectively, that personality is and should be a more important factor when looking for a partner if you want to have a compatible relationship, it’s just that when they are a confronted with an ugly male with a great personality they are incapable of feeling attraction towards him and naturally gravitate to a higher tier male.
 
I didn't say it was evil, just a bad thing to do to lie.

Women and normies do nothing immoral when they spew bullshit, but it is aggravating for humanity when they do so.
 
I didn't say it was evil, just a bad thing to do to lie.

Women and normies do nothing immoral when they spew bullshit, but it is aggravating for humanity when they do so.
Here we definitely agree, I just don’t consider them to be “lying” as I believe that they believe that everything they say is true.
 
I used to think there was something wrong with me because I'm not personable. :feelscry:
 
Exactly, brotha. Your family and friends matter too in the development of your personality.
https://www.bustle.com/articles/199...personality-is-genetic-a-lot-new-science-says

This is why ‘work on yourself’ seems to be such useless advice to me. Normies will say this line incessantly as the cure-all remedy to inceldom. When you still have potential to looksmax they will say it in reference to your appearance. If you are truecel tier they will more likely use the same line but tailored to improving your personality, as in their minds this is a more malleable and less rigid area for self improvement.

The study states; “it seems that extroversion and the tendency to be neurotic are heavily genetically influenced.” And if I’m honest this makes perfect sense to me, emotional intelligence seems to me as much as a genetic trait as good eyesight. When you see someone who is a poor communicator they look truly lost when trying to have people emotionally engage with what they are saying and yet you can also see extroverted kids and even toddlers who love the centre of attention and have an audience (including adults) who hang on their every word and laugh at their every joke. This is why it is clear that intelligence has little to do with effective communication and in fact the your delivery is far more important than the content of your speech.

If it were to become clear that every single one of your traits, from physical attractiveness to temperament and personality are entirely predetermined from the moment of your conception, then maybe humanity would understand that it is not only unfair, but also irrational to pass scrutiny and judgement over individuals based on these variables, which are entirely beyond their control since before even their birth.
 
There have been numerous case studies on identical twins who were separated at birth and not reunited until adulthood. The conclusion of every single one of these studies was that they had lived eerily similar lives while separated (despite having grown up in different environments) and had nearly identical hobbies, interests and personalities.
 
I think some people are definatly predisposed to have certain traits and have a certain intellect but I also think personality is influenced by your experiences and culture.
 
The ol' nature vs nurture argument. As I understand it, studies have shown nature is the main determining factor in the development of a person (rather than nurture).

Since one guy can impregnate tons of ladies, it seems like the birthrate should be 1:10 or something, with girls being the 10.
 

Similar threads

Third Eye
Replies
27
Views
795
sexualeconomist
sexualeconomist
THE TRUE SIGMA
Replies
39
Views
438
Hail
Hail
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
2
Views
226
light
light
TingusKangas
Replies
36
Views
986
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top