It’s an obvious bias that attractive people see the world as more fair then unattractive people. This is at its roots the ultimate form of hypocrisy and the painful reality is that these hypocrites set the standard on what is “moral” to keep those below them oppressed.
Obviously “morality” is a man made concept and only enforces inequality for those less fortunate. An example of this is a tall, good looking white guy that was able to live a life of degeneracy and sexual promiscuity and still look to religion as a bailout to get into a promising afterlife.
Imo Christianity offers too much leeway to repentance and allows those genetically better of to seek bailout in it then those that are genetically inferior. To clarify let’s take a highly sexual successful male as an example.
This type of male can perform all sorts of degenerate yet fulfilling acts as he wants and still be given the “out” of everyone is forgiven in the Christian faith. Is it not easier for such a person to accept “forgiveness” of sin after living a life of validation and sexually fulfillment rather then his counter part that had to endure a life of sexual frustration and is more prone to become bitter and hateful and less likely to accept the Christian tenants of forgiveness and repentance?
The game is rigged from the start. Chad is born into a world where he can “live it up” while he is young pursuing a life of complete degeneracy and adultery and still be accepted into a promising afterlife just because he “regrets his previous life choices and wants to repent now” whereas an incel that is born subjected into a hard life has a better chance of becoming “bitter and hateful” and have a higher chance of being cast into hell for his understandable “bitter hatred” then chad simply by random genetic chance. Hypocrisy at its finest and really makes one understand how “morality” can easily be marked off as a man made concept to keep those less fortunate at bay.
Obviously “morality” is a man made concept and only enforces inequality for those less fortunate. An example of this is a tall, good looking white guy that was able to live a life of degeneracy and sexual promiscuity and still look to religion as a bailout to get into a promising afterlife.
Imo Christianity offers too much leeway to repentance and allows those genetically better of to seek bailout in it then those that are genetically inferior. To clarify let’s take a highly sexual successful male as an example.
This type of male can perform all sorts of degenerate yet fulfilling acts as he wants and still be given the “out” of everyone is forgiven in the Christian faith. Is it not easier for such a person to accept “forgiveness” of sin after living a life of validation and sexually fulfillment rather then his counter part that had to endure a life of sexual frustration and is more prone to become bitter and hateful and less likely to accept the Christian tenants of forgiveness and repentance?
The game is rigged from the start. Chad is born into a world where he can “live it up” while he is young pursuing a life of complete degeneracy and adultery and still be accepted into a promising afterlife just because he “regrets his previous life choices and wants to repent now” whereas an incel that is born subjected into a hard life has a better chance of becoming “bitter and hateful” and have a higher chance of being cast into hell for his understandable “bitter hatred” then chad simply by random genetic chance. Hypocrisy at its finest and really makes one understand how “morality” can easily be marked off as a man made concept to keep those less fortunate at bay.
