Ironically I got this link from Incel "pot calling kettle black" Tears- so now they are only 99.999% useless. Even though IT said this story was relevant to incels.co posters, despite us being an incel forum and not a gay forum.
www.independent.co.uk
It seems so-called UK "pedo hunters" (name doesn't match as pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescents ages 8-12 or younger ages 0-7) have turned their focuscapturing entraping gay pedophiles homosexuals that like teenage adolescent males (13-15)- below the age of consent (in the UK it is 16 for straights or gays).
Weird as social services (and I got this researching the age of heterosexual age of consent being 16)
"Sexual activity is illegal under any circumstances for under-13 year olds. Those aged 12 and under cannot give consent. Doing anything sexual with someone under 13 is automatically an offence, whatever the young person says."
That implies while the age of consent is officially 16 it gives leeway for low inhibition Chads to "get in" early. Which is why 13-15 year old girls sleeping with men old enough to drive is commonplace in the UK.
Now the gay age of consent was lower to 16 in the UK in 2001.
What's interesting is I've noticed there has been a shift in focus of thesepedo hunters from Men seeking teen girls, to men seeking teen boys. So what's happened did the liberal lynch mob successfully scare men from being heterosexual?
Also doesn't it piss on the idea (hypothesis) that it was a ploy to stop heterosexuality if they are now going after gay men too?
I have a gay neighbour and he confirmed there is indeed a proactive drive in an active campaign amongst LGBT+ to identify and oust gay men from participating from LGB+ if its revealed he likes pre-AoC sex.
Does this mean gay men are virtue signallers or will end up revealed as closeted LGB+ groomers themselves?
Above all IT didn't read the article.
‘Paedophile hunters’ do not violate right to privacy, Supreme Court rules
‘The interests of children have priority over any interest a paedophile could have in being allowed to engage in criminal conduct’
www.independent.co.uk
It seems so-called UK "pedo hunters" (name doesn't match as pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescents ages 8-12 or younger ages 0-7) have turned their focus
Weird as social services (and I got this researching the age of heterosexual age of consent being 16)
"Sexual activity is illegal under any circumstances for under-13 year olds. Those aged 12 and under cannot give consent. Doing anything sexual with someone under 13 is automatically an offence, whatever the young person says."
That implies while the age of consent is officially 16 it gives leeway for low inhibition Chads to "get in" early. Which is why 13-15 year old girls sleeping with men old enough to drive is commonplace in the UK.
Now the gay age of consent was lower to 16 in the UK in 2001.
What's interesting is I've noticed there has been a shift in focus of these
Also doesn't it piss on the idea (hypothesis) that it was a ploy to stop heterosexuality if they are now going after gay men too?
I have a gay neighbour and he confirmed there is indeed a proactive drive in an active campaign amongst LGBT+ to identify and oust gay men from participating from LGB+ if its revealed he likes pre-AoC sex.
Does this mean gay men are virtue signallers or will end up revealed as closeted LGB+ groomers themselves?
Above all IT didn't read the article.
Last edited:
