A foid is never a adult atleast mentally.
some woman can start bleeding at 8, they're absolutely not adults. I would say that 16 is when their body fully matures.
Thats maybe a one in a million case or less, cherrypicking.
I imagine that must be one of the most difficult things for a secular (or even religious, tbh) man in Western society to accept. One day, their sweet little innocent princess will be chad's fucktoy. It's no wonder there's the stereotype of the masculine, tough guy dad who tries to be scary to the first boy who shows sexual interest in his teenage daughter.
i would say that being attracted to a 16 yo is normal since their body is fully/almost fully developed but a lot of the people here find girls below the age of 14 attractive and the only reason they dont say it is because they know they will get banned. A handful of people here did say they want to fuck a 12 yo and got immediately banned
Top fucking KEK. Imagine being so Goddamn horny for pre-teens that you can't shut up about it on the internet.
i would say that the average woman starts having sex at 16. Keep in mind that i say this because of my experience in my country and we're somewhat traditional, idk how it is in the us.
the average maybe. but a good amount of them start earlier.
Yeah honestly idk how you cope with that, I think its copeable if you also got to fuck a young girl when you were younger, but I cant imagine being a betabuxx having to see that shit
I think 14/15 is pretty normal, also confirmed by studies on wiki
i understand that, I'm absolutely not saying that 14 yos are innocent children. But some people here make it sound like the average 14 yo has a bodycount of 100 and for that reason the age of consent should be 14
www.statnews.com
usually the woman who end up as fucktoys have an absent dad or their dad doesn't give a fuck about them
Oh right nah, but I reckon a good portion of them have their first fuck or 2 at that age, some of them will definitely wait a little longer
that's the reason i made this thread, im tired of them talking about fucking pre pubescent girls and talking about "muh agecuck!"Top fucking KEK. Imagine being so Goddamn horny for pre-teens that you can't shut up about it on the internet.
for believing a 40 yo shouldn't fuck a 13 yo
Like i said, foids mentally stop maturing very early. Why else do you think foids behave like children or babies in many ways ? E.g. crying when they dont get what they want, always wanting attention 24/7, throwing a tantrum when things dont go their way
I think that's part of the reason they would call you an agecuck. Suppose that the 13 year old was sexually mature and the age of consent was in fact 13. Would you still have a problem with the 40 year old fucking the 13 year old?that's the reason i made this thread, im tired of them talking about fucking pre pubescent girls and talking about "muh agecuck!"
i would say that it was 10% when i was 14 but it probably has moved to 20-30%. I'm seeing modern 14 yos and its crazy at how they dress, their whole body is exposed. Modern women are becoming whores that dont even get paid
I have no idea either. On one hand, you want to rightly protect your daughter from being taken sexual advantage of (pumped and dumped). But on the other, society would shame you for being "controlling and toxic" and other bullshit feminist labels just for being a protective father who, by all reasonable accounts, should be protective in that manner. It's his family and lineage he's protecting, after all. That's his duty, right, and obligation.
yes. I think a lot of you misunderstand a big reason why i don't want 30 yo Chad fucking JB. Its because if i can't have it, neither should he
I missed out on teen love and pussy so he can't have it either. I'm bitter about it. I don't understand how other members in this forum dont feel anger at seeing 30 yo chad getting something they will never have @Friezacel
I am angry, but i blame kikes, my parents and foids more than Chadsyes. I think a lot of you misunderstand a big reason why i don't want 30 yo Chad fucking JB. Its because if i can't have it, neither should he
You're right to feel bitter. I just don't see a moral problem with it, if she's sexually mature and willing. The "muh agecuck"ers loudly make moral arguments. They're right in some respects, but then they make the habit of trying to hijack the logic to sneak in their pedophilia arguments, which is fucked up.yes. I think a lot of you misunderstand a big reason why i don't want 30 yo Chad fucking JB. Its because if i can't have it, neither should he
in my country woman get their ass whooped by their parents for being sluts
If you move to a traditional country you would have no problem with protecting your daughter but avoid citiesBased. As well, they should.in my country woman get their ass whooped by their parents for being sluts
The systems that were kind of in place for it are gone now, just another reason to not have kids, it used to be that you got yours, but you had to raise your daughter so that someone gets theirs, but now if I were to somehow have a kid by betabuxxing, I would have just gotten betabuxx starfish sex then raise my daughter to get used by chad(s)
I think the moral argument is that if the age of consent is lowered, a lot of girls will get taken advantage of. If a 40 yo man approaches a 13 yo and he tells her to have sex, the 13 yo will be too scared to say no because its a man 5 times her size. And younger girls are more easily manipulated and they fall more easily under peer pressure.
The good old days (pre-feminism) are gone. You're absolutely correct that it was kind of a social contract between men back then. Everyone had an understanding of why things needed to be kept strict.
That's a fair argument, but I don't think that qualifies as a moral argument. That argument is about safety and coercion. What I was pointing out was that, if she's sexually mature and willing, then it means there's no coercion used and there is no threat to her safety, which means that there needs to be a stronger case for why it's morally objectionable. The "power differential" argument that feminists and others in the gynocentric West use are mostly invalid. They make emotional appeals and argue the edge cases, like the 140 kg psychopath who refuses to take no for an answer and is willing to rape, for example.
I have no opinion on what the legal age of consent should be. I don't even care, tbh.
in that case i have no argument. Other than safety and coercion there isn't something morally wrong with an older man having sex with a younger girl.
thats true, i probably wouldn't consider it wrong at all if i was raised in a different culture. But its hard to get rid of morals and views you were fed as a child.
I have no valid moral argument for why it would be wrong either. That's why I don't reject the action. I've yet to see a strong moral argument to be made against that case, tbh.
Nearly everyone on the planet gets their morals from society (parents, religion, school etc.). It's true that it's difficult to replace your entire moral system and values that you were raised with. Most people gradually change. Almost nobody abruptly changes who they are and what they believe in overnight.
Imo age of consent whatever it should be should never be age gap based. its just moronic
