Your kids are the vehicles by which you will achieve genetic immortality.
they are your only hope
parents push education/success on their kids because it’s a requisite element of financial success.. the only element one has control over. Money is changeable (kinda. The limit is genetic), genes are not
it’s kind of like a safety net because you can’t be sure of your kid’s future genetics while he’s still young.
if all else fails, atleast he can purchase a wife/attract one with resources. it’s very improbable that a wealthy man be unable to attract a mate and remain lonely and childless. So no matter what, a financially success son (of undetermined looks) has higher odds of sexual success that a broke one
why don’t people push their duaghters to get educated/get high oaying high status careers? Everybody in their bones knows that resourcefulness has no bearing on female sexual market value. People generally leave their duaghters alone since there’s really nothing you can do to change her odds of sexual success.. all girls need to do is exist. I guess maybe parents would hope their duaghters turns out hot. That way she can get a higher SMV male. Higher in both sperm quality and resources and give her offspring higher chances of genetic immortality..
When people are unaware of their own motivations, truth comes out. If feminists were made aware of this, they could claim “unconscious conformation to patriarchy/society standards blah blah blah”
when it comes to ones own genetic immortality, there is no such thing as political correctness.. it’s life and death. It’s the ultimate cost if you decide to dishonestly virtue signal and abide by ridiculous ideologies to not hurt other people’s feelings. What’s more important, peer approval or genetic immortality? “I’m gonna waste my finite time and resources furthering my duaghters education at the expense of my sons because equality!”.. The cost is death of the genes. Honesty is mandatory.
theory: parents would be less likely to despise/kick out a tall handsome slayer chad son that’s poor and has no financial prospects, than a son with both low SMV and similarly low financial prospects. A tall hot son circumvents the resource requirement with his genes. Has one less step. Parents can rest easy knowing their son will give them immortality. Ugly sons will have to buy/earn their parents love (emotional/resource investment)
everything comes down to sexual success/sexual competition. it just looks futuristic and distinct like we’re separate From animals and have elements to our beings.
this could also explain ethnics pushing their kids to do better than their peers in school. With a multi phenotype sexual market, the low SMV races know exactly where they stand.
TL:dr: parents want their sons to do well in school and make good money not as an end itself, but as a means to achieve sexual success.. sex is the real goal, school is just how you get there. Otherwise they’d be content with their sons just being mediocre/barely making just enough at McDonald’s to survive/be self sufficient. Any more money than is necessary to survive is wealth signalling to attract mates.
they are your only hope
parents push education/success on their kids because it’s a requisite element of financial success.. the only element one has control over. Money is changeable (kinda. The limit is genetic), genes are not
it’s kind of like a safety net because you can’t be sure of your kid’s future genetics while he’s still young.
if all else fails, atleast he can purchase a wife/attract one with resources. it’s very improbable that a wealthy man be unable to attract a mate and remain lonely and childless. So no matter what, a financially success son (of undetermined looks) has higher odds of sexual success that a broke one
why don’t people push their duaghters to get educated/get high oaying high status careers? Everybody in their bones knows that resourcefulness has no bearing on female sexual market value. People generally leave their duaghters alone since there’s really nothing you can do to change her odds of sexual success.. all girls need to do is exist. I guess maybe parents would hope their duaghters turns out hot. That way she can get a higher SMV male. Higher in both sperm quality and resources and give her offspring higher chances of genetic immortality..
When people are unaware of their own motivations, truth comes out. If feminists were made aware of this, they could claim “unconscious conformation to patriarchy/society standards blah blah blah”
when it comes to ones own genetic immortality, there is no such thing as political correctness.. it’s life and death. It’s the ultimate cost if you decide to dishonestly virtue signal and abide by ridiculous ideologies to not hurt other people’s feelings. What’s more important, peer approval or genetic immortality? “I’m gonna waste my finite time and resources furthering my duaghters education at the expense of my sons because equality!”.. The cost is death of the genes. Honesty is mandatory.
theory: parents would be less likely to despise/kick out a tall handsome slayer chad son that’s poor and has no financial prospects, than a son with both low SMV and similarly low financial prospects. A tall hot son circumvents the resource requirement with his genes. Has one less step. Parents can rest easy knowing their son will give them immortality. Ugly sons will have to buy/earn their parents love (emotional/resource investment)
everything comes down to sexual success/sexual competition. it just looks futuristic and distinct like we’re separate From animals and have elements to our beings.
this could also explain ethnics pushing their kids to do better than their peers in school. With a multi phenotype sexual market, the low SMV races know exactly where they stand.
TL:dr: parents want their sons to do well in school and make good money not as an end itself, but as a means to achieve sexual success.. sex is the real goal, school is just how you get there. Otherwise they’d be content with their sons just being mediocre/barely making just enough at McDonald’s to survive/be self sufficient. Any more money than is necessary to survive is wealth signalling to attract mates.
Last edited:
