Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

.org users don't know how to rate

N

Nihilisticcel

aspie LTN
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Posts
98
For them only Models are "Chads", which is above a 7

Chads are chadlites for them ( 7 )

Most mid-low chadlites are HTNs for them ( 6 )

and sometimes their MTNs are actually HTNs or at least high MTNs (5.5-5.75)


But I have to say the average to below average looking they are usually good at rating ( below 5.5/10 )
 
they say its over to anyone that isn't a model
 
They unironically said Chico wasn’t Chad because his maxilla was flat
 
they say its over to anyone that isn't a model
This is true though. Even Normies have a hard time these days and most of them get and keep gfs by being open cucks and letting her ride all sorts of different meat.
 
the extremely square faces, handsome squidward are honestly less handsome
 
.org lurkers will probably screenshot this.
Guys who are literally chadlites will usually get the rating Mid HTN -High HTN in some cases MTN. And their brain is completely rotted by Tiktok (an app I never installed)
Also, I don't like the whole High Htn , Low high XYZ LTN and even the PSL rating scale.
All of it is autistic. Cause you are either attractive to women or not, it's that simple.
 
Mentally ill teenagers who will end up here eventually jfl
 
.org lurkers will probably screenshot this.
Guys who are literally chadlites will usually get the rating Mid HTN -High HTN in some cases MTN. And their brain is completely rotted by Tiktok (an app I never installed)
Also, I don't like the whole High Htn , Low high XYZ LTN and even the PSL rating scale.
All of it is autistic. Cause you are either attractive to women or not, it's that simple.

Yea you are agree but you know

High MTNs may be attractive for LTBs/MTBs but not for stacylites for sure.
 
Most users here cant rate for shit either, they especially tend to overrate toilets
 
.org rating system is the most accurate I’ve seen so far imo
 
They unironically said Chico wasn’t Chad because his maxilla was flat
They have unironically called Ryan Gosling a Subhuman. It must be so tiring to be on .org analyzing every molecule of bone and tissue.
Their icon, Jordan Barrett, looks like he came out of a 3D printer. I showed a pic of him to my mom and he said he bore a resemblance to one of those red faced monkeys.
 
They have unironically called Ryan Gosling a Subhuman. It must be so tiring to be on .org analyzing every molecule of bone and tissue.
Their icon, Jordan Barrett, looks like he came out of a 3D printer. I showed a pic of him to my mom and he said he bore a resemblance to one of those red faced monkeys.
My sister said he looks like a husky
 
imagine posting your face on there for those homosexuals to rate you
 
.org = closeted homosexuals that chad and foid worship, looksmaxxing is normieslop
 
I dunno. I mean, the way I rate isn't the same as theirs (I don't like that PSL scale where 8/10 is the highest), yet you'd probably say that I do it wrong too. To me, chads are 8/10, gigachads are 9/10, photoshopped chads and gigachads 8+ and 9+ respectively. (If anything, I'm not here to argue about my rating system being right or wrong.)
I mean the very idea of rating men as an incel is kinda pointless. Like, if the guy is above average in terms of looks, he mogs me to oblivion, and he can get some pussy, so not an incel.
 

Similar threads

JustanotherKanga
Replies
19
Views
214
light
light
BlackLowLtn
Replies
20
Views
659
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top