IncelCatechumen
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
- Posts
- 1,332
A lot of foids like to emphasize that nowadays the beauty standards among guys are "changing," and that the principle of big muscularity is simply going away (false, but okay). The foids that affirm this tend to not be normal foids but rather alternative-oriented individuals: normal w*men continue to like muscular guys like soccer players or actors such as the Rock or the guy that played Aquaman.
It seems that the foids who are into androgynous aesthetics are:
- Alternative oriented
- Bisexual
- Young - Young Adults
Anyway, let's assume that this is true, but now we should ask what are the characteristics of this androgynous individuals?
- They are def not working class: they represent the upper middle class urban ethos of progressiveness and openness.
- They are overwhelmingly white or pale (koreans, japanese: notice the lack of south-east asians in this aesthetics of androgyny). Latinos, blacks, and arabs are simply out-of-the-question. Notice that the blacks who are into e-boy aesthetics are mulatto or light-skin. No indians are e-boy, and latino e-boys are castizos or light skin mestizos.
- All of them are traditionally attractive (symmetrical faces, elegant noses, hunter eyes, and jawlines) and tend to NOT BE FAT but rather have a muscular skinny look.
I feel that, in this case, two elements of the more nuanced versions of the blackpill prevail:
- The JBW theory. (proximity to whiteness is desirable)
- The importance of economic status in dating success. (upper middle class)
- Lookism (fatphobia, pretty-face privilege)
Therefore, the blackpill prevails. The androgynous aesthetic is simply an affirmation of blackpill values.
It seems that the foids who are into androgynous aesthetics are:
- Alternative oriented
- Bisexual
- Young - Young Adults
Anyway, let's assume that this is true, but now we should ask what are the characteristics of this androgynous individuals?
- They are def not working class: they represent the upper middle class urban ethos of progressiveness and openness.
- They are overwhelmingly white or pale (koreans, japanese: notice the lack of south-east asians in this aesthetics of androgyny). Latinos, blacks, and arabs are simply out-of-the-question. Notice that the blacks who are into e-boy aesthetics are mulatto or light-skin. No indians are e-boy, and latino e-boys are castizos or light skin mestizos.
- All of them are traditionally attractive (symmetrical faces, elegant noses, hunter eyes, and jawlines) and tend to NOT BE FAT but rather have a muscular skinny look.
I feel that, in this case, two elements of the more nuanced versions of the blackpill prevail:
- The JBW theory. (proximity to whiteness is desirable)
- The importance of economic status in dating success. (upper middle class)
- Lookism (fatphobia, pretty-face privilege)
Therefore, the blackpill prevails. The androgynous aesthetic is simply an affirmation of blackpill values.