In the animal world there is not betabuxxing or friend zoning so genetically inferior mammals are simply not in the mating game. Makes sense to me but no idea id it should make us feel better.
T
Obligatory, brutal and it's over, as always
It holds true to Homo Sapiens as well. It's over.
Replace the 40% with a 20% and I'll believe you.
Probably better. It's alright to fail, males are supposed to fail often.
M
But the reason why in most cases is that the stronger males will fuck instead of them and keep them at bay. In most mammal species the male is stronger then the female and can rape.
Cats, for example, rape. I have observed quite a lot of cat sex in my days and it's always rapey, even when the female cat is in the heat.
Conclusion: it's one thing to keep away from a female because she's fucking a stronger and more dominant male, but it's another thing to have a whole system (police, laws, cucks) to let women fuck other males and keep you at bay. This is artificial and cucked as fuck.
Why would you defend an unclaimed female that 1) is both sexually developed and sexually active 2) is not a member of your family 3) you're not fucking and 4) you don't have an interest in fucking (assuming you're not courting her at the time the other male comes) from some other male sexually investing in her? This is cucked/whiteknight behavior, the most odious type of male behavior.
Cats, for example, rape. I have observed quite a lot of cat sex in my days and it's always rapey, even when the female cat is in the heat.
Conclusion: it's one thing to keep away from a female because she's fucking a stronger and more dominant male, but it's another thing to have a whole system (police, laws, cucks) to let women fuck other males and keep you at bay. This is artificial and cucked as fuck.
Why would you defend an unclaimed female that 1) is both sexually developed and sexually active 2) is not a member of your family 3) you're not fucking and 4) you don't have an interest in fucking (assuming you're not courting her at the time the other male comes) from some other male sexually investing in her? This is cucked/whiteknight behavior, the most odious type of male behavior.
They don't seem to care. We on the other hand, as emotionally advanced sexless male mammals, are cursed to get sad about those numbers.
Actually makes me feel better that I'm among the majority.
Tbh.Wonder if men will ever wake up from their cucked state.
40% is too high, in humans modern day its more like 5%
W
The other males die usually, tho but we are forced to behere to watch them get to breed and we have to slave away so we don't end up on the street, it's cruel.
Because they are hell bent on destroying inferior men. + one-upmanship and whiteknighting/getting into a woman's good book to make themselves feel superior.
I read once that there are 8 times as many women as men in the geneological tree that leads up to modern humans. Every fertile woman that made it to child bearing years reproduced, whereas only certain men did. The rest died in a war to save the royals'/church's stone quarry or some bullshit like that.
Yep. You lose the genetic lottery when you end up male. Just exist mode if you're a women.
B
Other 60% is betabuxxing or roping
That may be true but in the meantime most men seem to be im relationships even if they are cucked ones. Even a penniless taxi driver seems to be breeding but not us
40% is fair imo. In the olden days (1950s golden America) I presume the number was closer to 40% too. With the advent of the age of Tinder, GigaChad's cock is literally just one swipe away. Modern days its closer to the top 5% of men (it use to be top 7% of men in 2017). It gets worse each year too, with "online dating" becoming more and more popular. I predict in 2 years it will be the top 2% of men only.
But what will happen to the rest 98% of men?
Of all mammal species? I get humans but where did you get this with other mammals?
sound accurate, earlier statistics show 61 million American men between 15-44, 47% of these men have fathered at least 1 chilld, so could be 40% or less now.
Not where I live.
We have rapidly declining population
S
this is cope tbh
you think youd get to fuck foids and live a better quality life if the law dont protect women? jfl
there would be a ton of men murdering each other over women, and itd be fucking chaotic
I aint wanna look over my back, wondering when some dude gonna try to shoot/stab me over my foid
hell thered be a couple of warlords hogging all the woman
most incels arent even stronger than cucks tbh
at least now, foids pick handsome men to breed with, so the genetic pool would be healthier and prettier
if theyre straight up fucking warlords, human species would turn more and more violent real quick
I saw a documentary about an incel hippo once, he tried to compete with the alpha, lost
realized its over, no way to beat the gigachad, so he just stopped eating and eventually died...
Last edited:
M
But that scenario would at least be consistent. We either have civilization or barbarism, this mid-term where women get to have a cake and eat it too sucks.
If you're just talking about animals I think 40% is too much.
Maybe 20%
Maybe 20%
Source of the 40% number ? i need scientific evidence for my Blackpill folder .
S
Look at the silver lining though, now marriage is harder to obtain for foids, back then, the only way a foid is going to have sex with you,
is if you married her, aint no test drive allowed.
Nowadays, normies can take foids on 2/3 dates and fuck, and if she dont want to, hell just find someone else who will.
sex used to be husband privilege, not anymore.
plus from what I heard a lot of normie couple split the bill 50/50, sometimes even after marriage. While back then, men has to pay for everything.
Now foid has to be the gf for a couple of years before they get married, giving sex, blowjobs, etc with no security of marriage.
And risk men stringing them along and end up wasting years of their youth.
imo sexual liberation cost women quite a lot ? or maybe im just coping
Last edited:
M
You're right about that. The only people who really win in the current paradigm are Chads and the true elites who planned those anti-family agendas like feminism, promotion of gays, etc. A tiny fraction of the population, even if put together.Look at the silver lining though, now marriage is harder to obtain for foids, back then, the only way a foid is going to have sex with you,
is if you married her, aint no test drive allowed.
Nowadays, normies can take foids on 2/3 dates and fuck, and if she dont want to, hell just find someone else who will.
sex used to be husband privilege, not anymore.
plus from what I heard a lot of normie couple split the bill 50/50, sometimes even after marriage. While back then, men has to pay for everything.
Now foid has to be the gf for a couple of years before they get married, giving sex, blowjobs, etc with no security of marriage.
And risk men stringing them along and end up wasting years of their youth.
imo sexual liberation cost women quite a lot ? or maybe im just coping
Over for many mammals.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
