Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal One pill is the reason we're all fucked

uo89997

uo89997

Banned
-
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Posts
10,040
Contraception is the sole cause for our inceldom.

If a woman does not have access to contraception but wants to have raw sex with a man, there is a very high chance she will get pregnant if she is young and fertile. This forces her to become a mother and takes her and her man off of the dating market.

The result is nuclear families and lots of children.

With contraception, a woman can now have raw sex with as many men as she wants without consequence. There is no other purpose to contraception other than to allow a woman to be a slut.

What this means is that she can fuck Chads all day long while lower value men are left in the dust.

Is she happy with this set up that clearly benefits her? No.

She still complains all day long that she is oppressed by every Supreme Court except Israel's.

But when a man says the same thing he is laughed at and mocked until, eventually, he feels the only thing left for him to do is kill himself and take a few whores along with him (in Minecraft).
 
Even when contraceptives fail there are always abortions.
 
contraception is surely a reason for inceldom but i dont think its the sole reason due to there are no woman wants to have raw sex with me to begin with. Nice post tho
 
Contraception pills also lead to the rise of low T men, because the hormones end up in the water

Just ban all kinds of contraception except for condoms
 
Even when contraceptives fail there are always abortions.
True, abortion rates would probably increase if contraceptive pills were taken away. But murdering your own unborn child is a lot harder of a decision to make than popping a pill every day.
 
contraception is surely a reason for inceldom but i dont think its the sole reason due to there are no woman wants to have raw sex with me to begin with. Nice post tho
There are no women who want to have raw sex with you because they are using contraception to have raw sex with Chads (the cock carousel).

For example, if contraception did not exist, Leonardo DiCaprio would not be able to fuck a new model every three months, he would have had to have settled down with his highschool girlfriend because she would have been pregnant.
 
Last edited:
There are no women who want to have raw sex with you because they are using contraception to have raw sex with Chads (the cock carousel).

For example, if contraception did not exist, Leonardo DiCaprio would not be able to fuck a new model every three months, he would have had to have settled down with his highschool girlfriend because she would have been pregnant.
:feelsthink: good take
 
Contraception is the sole cause for our inceldom.

If a woman does not have access to contraception but wants to have raw sex with a man, there is a very high chance she will get pregnant if she is young and fertile. This forces her to become a mother and takes her and her man off of the dating market.

The result is nuclear families and lots of children.

With contraception, a woman can now have raw sex with as many men as she wants without consequence. There is no other purpose to contraception other than to allow a woman to be a slut.

What this means is that she can fuck Chads all day long while lower value men are left in the dust.

Is she happy with this set up that clearly benefits her? No.

She still complains all day long that she is oppressed by every Supreme Court except Israel's.

But when a man says the same thing he is laughed at and mocked until, eventually, he feels the only thing left for him to do is kill himself and take a few whores along with him (in Minecraft).
Birth control and Tinder made things worse but Incels always existed. We need Marxism Rodgerism.
 
I mean. People would still just have sex and we would not
 
Yes.

It seems like in the past the women would become mothers early on and then every year there would be a new batch of fresh virgins out of the factory ready to mate. So even if you were 25, 29, 34, you still had a chance with one of these.

Now if you're 27, your only options are

a used cumslut with 40 bodies (if you're lucky)

or a single mom with gay retard children
 
Even when contraceptives fail there are always abortions.
abortions used to be a lot harder when medical technology wasn't as good and readily available. foids used to die from it. now, they can just go to the clinic and get incel wageslave taxpayers to betabux their abortion.

i think technology as a whole is the real pill, rather than just contraceptives specifically.
 
Spoken like a scholar!

Very good my fellow ogrecel!
 
no contraception leads to increased crime
 
Sexual revolution was a mistake. It breeds degeneracy and leads to pointless non-generative sex. All just for a cheap dopamine high between the top men (in looks/status/NTness) and all women, until they're so desensitized and can't pair bond to any human anymore, ultimately dying childless and actually unsatisfied with life in the end. Especially the women, being childless seems to affect many of them brutally later in life, after their dopaminergic system is fried and the men they crave aren't as attracted to them anymore.

Michel Houellebecq

“It is interesting to note that the "sexual revolution" was sometimes portrayed as a communal utopia, whereas in fact it was simply another stage in the historical rise of individualism. As the lovely word "household" suggests, the couple and the family would be the last bastion of primitive communism in liberal society. The sexual revolution was to destroy these intermediary communities, the last to separate the individual from the market. The destruction continues to this day.”


― Michel Houellebecq, The Elementary Particles

“It's a fact...that in societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute pauperization . Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as 'the law of the market'...Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society.”

 
Last edited:
Contraception pills also lead to the rise of low T men, because the hormones end up in the water

Just ban all kinds of contraception except for condoms
Exactly, condoms are the only acceptable form, as they ruin sex anyway.
 
Birth control and Tinder made things worse but Incels always existed.
Yup so long as women have rights and we live in a matriarchy incels will exists
 
My mutt-faced Slavic mother had access to contraceptives and still voluntarily brought a subhuman into existence

Some women really just want to reproduce their genetics even if they are aware the genetics are absolute garbage
 
foids would rather get fingered by chad than have sex with an incel anyway
 
I'm too drunk for this post, tbh.
 
Sexual revolution was a mistake. It breeds degeneracy and leads to pointless non-generative sex. All just for a cheap dopamine high between the top men (in looks/status/NTness) and all women, until they're so desensitized and can't pair bond to any human anymore, ultimately dying childless and actually unsatisfied with life in the end. Especially the women, being childless seems to affect many of them brutally later in life, after their dopaminergic system is fried and the men they crave aren't as attracted to them anymore.

Michel Houellebecq

“It is interesting to note that the "sexual revolution" was sometimes portrayed as a communal utopia, whereas in fact it was simply another stage in the historical rise of individualism. As the lovely word "household" suggests, the couple and the family would be the last bastion of primitive communism in liberal society. The sexual revolution was to destroy these intermediary communities, the last to separate the individual from the market. The destruction continues to this day.”


― Michel Houellebecq, The Elementary Particles

“It's a fact...that in societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute pauperization . Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as 'the law of the market'...Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society.”

Based snail eater, Joullebeuq is the first Marxist Rodgerist
 

Similar threads

WornOutHopecel
Replies
9
Views
249
BlueCore
BlueCore
JucheApologist
Replies
8
Views
156
faded
faded
Freixel
Replies
16
Views
237
Freixel
Freixel
L
Replies
4
Views
135
lost soul
L

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top