Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Official EU survey from 2014] 33% of non-partner physical assaults on women include other women as perpetrators

WorthlessSlavicShit

WorthlessSlavicShit

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 30, 2022
Posts
11,201
"Muh men so scary, muh men are so dangerous, muh we need women-only spaces everywhere to protect us from scary men, muh all women are scared of all men so much men can't even imagine it, muh any men even raising their voices is terrifying to all women...:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:"

We all know how much feminists love pretending that men are terrifyingly aggressive and violent beasts, how all women are supposedly "socialized into fearing men", all men actually with no exceptions, and how even seeing a guy in a women's bathroom is something terrifying to women because they are "an oppressed class" and they can never feel safe with even a single man around. Absolutely all feminists do this, absolutely no feminist has a problem with demonizing men like this, the one and only, single point of contention is whether MTF trannies are scary men or poor, harmless, oppressed women. To libfems they are the latter, to TERFs they are the former (FTM trannies are the latter to both, nobody, absolutely nobody gives a shit about FTMs or actually sees them as men or whatever.)

So, why not look at some actual data:feelsaww:? I found this study when someone linked it in a thread on r/MensRights. A 2014, official EU-wide survey on violence against women. Because of course, nobody gives a shit about violence against men:feelsseriously:. Regardless, the survey divided the types of violence into two. Partner-perpetrated, which there was a lot of because European women's personality detectors are simply excellent and they can pick up on non-abuser traits to reject "boring" men who can't bring "excitement" into their lives, and non-partner-perpetrated, which is the actually scary one because in most cases you haven't brought it down on yourself unlike the former type:feelsUgh:.


After a crapload of text and other images, maps and so on, the survey actually gives us the most interesting finding. Sex of perpetrators of those stranger physical assaults on women, in percent:

1724085800527


67% of the attacks were done by sole men, 26% by sole women, and 7% by at least one man and one woman. Leaving the latter alone, that leaves us with a 67:26 = roughly 2,5:1 or 5:2 ratio of male:female perpetrators of those attacks, meaning that for every five women attacked by men, there are two women attacked by other women. Adding in those 7%, this becomes almost a 2:1 ration, with 33% of all physical assaults on women done by people other than their partners having a woman as either the sole attacker or an accomplice to another male attacker.

And the best part?

Comparing incidents of non-partner physical violence by form of violence used, incidents by a female perpetrator are more likely to involve grabbing the respondent or pulling her by her hair, compared with incidents by male perpetrators. Incidents where the perpetrator is male are more likely to include pushing or shoving the respondent. There are no other notable differences between male and female perpetrators in the forms of violence used.
Pushing and shoving was disproportionately done by men, hair-grabbing and pulling by women, and everything else had no significant gender difference.

So, what were those other types of assault?

1724085815335


Taking the quoted paragraph into account, this means that slapping someone, beating someone with a fist or a hard object or kicking her, burning someone, suffocating/strangling someone, cutting, stabbing or shooting at someone or beating a woman's head against something were all roughly as likely to be done by men as they were to be done by women. Taking the absolute numbers into account of course, with female assailants only being present in 33% of those attacks. But still, no real gender difference in doing any of this.

But "Muh we need female-only spaces to feel safe:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:."

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

@DarkStar @GeckoBus @BlackCel_from_ZA @based_meme @reveries @To koniec @Copexodius Maximus @Anarcho Nihilist @Stupid Clown @Regenerator @Epedaphic @slavcel11 @kay' @Sloth22 @comradespiderman29 @Incline @Ron.Belgrade @PersonalityChad @Pancakecel
 
And if anyone wants to see which people were doing that violence, where it was happening and how it is country-by-country...

1724085892723
1724085903642
1724085924865
1724085937172
 
But but "Gender violence" Is real. Everyone knows men are a far bigger threat to women than other women. I know because my gender studies' professor said so.

Sarcasm
 
Another piece of feminist propaganda deboonked
 
1696145287252

Great find, thanks for sharing btw. This was back in 2014, i wonder how the situation is now.
 
"Muh men so scary, muh men are so dangerous, muh we need women-only spaces everywhere to protect us from scary men, muh all women are scared of all men so much men can't even imagine it, muh any men even raising their voices is terrifying to all women...:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:"

We all know how much feminists love pretending that men are terrifyingly aggressive and violent beasts, how all women are supposedly "socialized into fearing men", all men actually with no exceptions, and how even seeing a guy in a women's bathroom is something terrifying to women because they are "an oppressed class" and they can never feel safe with even a single man around. Absolutely all feminists do this, absolutely no feminist has a problem with demonizing men like this, the one and only, single point of contention is whether MTF trannies are scary men or poor, harmless, oppressed women. To libfems they are the latter, to TERFs they are the former (FTM trannies are the latter to both, nobody, absolutely nobody gives a shit about FTMs or actually sees them as men or whatever.)

So, why not look at some actual data:feelsaww:? I found this study when someone linked it in a thread on r/MensRights. A 2014, official EU-wide survey on violence against women. Because of course, nobody gives a shit about violence against men:feelsseriously:. Regardless, the survey divided the types of violence into two. Partner-perpetrated, which there was a lot of because European women's personality detectors are simply excellent and they can pick up on non-abuser traits to reject "boring" men who can't bring "excitement" into their lives, and non-partner-perpetrated, which is the actually scary one because in most cases you haven't brought it down on yourself unlike the former type:feelsUgh:.


After a crapload of text and other images, maps and so on, the survey actually gives us the most interesting finding. Sex of perpetrators of those stranger physical assaults on women, in percent:

View attachment 1229803

67% of the attacks were done by sole men, 26% by sole women, and 7% by at least one man and one woman. Leaving the latter alone, that leaves us with a 67:26 = roughly 2,5:1 or 5:2 ratio of male:female perpetrators of those attacks, meaning that for every five women attacked by men, there are two women attacked by other women. Adding in those 7%, this becomes almost a 2:1 ration, with 33% of all physical assaults on women done by people other than their partners having a woman as either the sole attacker or an accomplice to another male attacker.

And the best part?


Pushing and shoving was disproportionately done by men, hair-grabbing and pulling by women, and everything else had no significant gender difference.

So, what were those other types of assault?

View attachment 1229804

Taking the quoted paragraph into account, this means that slapping someone, beating someone with a fist or a hard object or kicking her, burning someone, suffocating/strangling someone, cutting, stabbing or shooting at someone or beating a woman's head against something were all roughly as likely to be done by men as they were to be done by women. Taking the absolute numbers into account of course, with female assailants only being present in 33% of those attacks. But still, no real gender difference in doing any of this.

But "Muh we need female-only spaces to feel safe:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:."

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

@DarkStar @GeckoBus @BlackCel_from_ZA @based_meme @reveries @To koniec @Copexodius Maximus @Anarcho Nihilist @Stupid Clown @Regenerator @Epedaphic @slavcel11 @kay' @Sloth22 @comradespiderman29 @Incline @Ron.Belgrade @PersonalityChad @Pancakecel
How I hate the lies and hypocrisy of foids. I hear the same thing when they say that a woman ruler is not inclined to wage wars and to cruel rule.Thanks for the interesting post, as always good.
 
"Muh men so scary, muh men are so dangerous, muh we need women-only spaces everywhere to protect us from scary men, muh all women are scared of all men so much men can't even imagine it, muh any men even raising their voices is terrifying to all women...:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:"

We all know how much feminists love pretending that men are terrifyingly aggressive and violent beasts, how all women are supposedly "socialized into fearing men", all men actually with no exceptions, and how even seeing a guy in a women's bathroom is something terrifying to women because they are "an oppressed class" and they can never feel safe with even a single man around. Absolutely all feminists do this, absolutely no feminist has a problem with demonizing men like this, the one and only, single point of contention is whether MTF trannies are scary men or poor, harmless, oppressed women. To libfems they are the latter, to TERFs they are the former (FTM trannies are the latter to both, nobody, absolutely nobody gives a shit about FTMs or actually sees them as men or whatever.)

So, why not look at some actual data:feelsaww:? I found this study when someone linked it in a thread on r/MensRights. A 2014, official EU-wide survey on violence against women. Because of course, nobody gives a shit about violence against men:feelsseriously:. Regardless, the survey divided the types of violence into two. Partner-perpetrated, which there was a lot of because European women's personality detectors are simply excellent and they can pick up on non-abuser traits to reject "boring" men who can't bring "excitement" into their lives, and non-partner-perpetrated, which is the actually scary one because in most cases you haven't brought it down on yourself unlike the former type:feelsUgh:.


After a crapload of text and other images, maps and so on, the survey actually gives us the most interesting finding. Sex of perpetrators of those stranger physical assaults on women, in percent:

View attachment 1229803

67% of the attacks were done by sole men, 26% by sole women, and 7% by at least one man and one woman. Leaving the latter alone, that leaves us with a 67:26 = roughly 2,5:1 or 5:2 ratio of male:female perpetrators of those attacks, meaning that for every five women attacked by men, there are two women attacked by other women. Adding in those 7%, this becomes almost a 2:1 ration, with 33% of all physical assaults on women done by people other than their partners having a woman as either the sole attacker or an accomplice to another male attacker.

And the best part?


Pushing and shoving was disproportionately done by men, hair-grabbing and pulling by women, and everything else had no significant gender difference.

So, what were those other types of assault?

View attachment 1229804

Taking the quoted paragraph into account, this means that slapping someone, beating someone with a fist or a hard object or kicking her, burning someone, suffocating/strangling someone, cutting, stabbing or shooting at someone or beating a woman's head against something were all roughly as likely to be done by men as they were to be done by women. Taking the absolute numbers into account of course, with female assailants only being present in 33% of those attacks. But still, no real gender difference in doing any of this.

But "Muh we need female-only spaces to feel safe:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:."

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

@DarkStar @GeckoBus @BlackCel_from_ZA @based_meme @reveries @To koniec @Copexodius Maximus @Anarcho Nihilist @Stupid Clown @Regenerator @Epedaphic @slavcel11 @kay' @Sloth22 @comradespiderman29 @Incline @Ron.Belgrade @PersonalityChad @Pancakecel
Thinking Brain GIF by MOODMAN

wait, I thought women are incapable of physical aggression because they are natural nest makers who just want to stay home, raise children and make cookies? Estrogen does not make you immune to temptation? WHAAAAAAATTTT?!? :shock::shock::shock:
SO FEMINISM TM DID NOT BRAINWESH ME BOOTIFUL KWEEENSZZZ?!?!?!? HWA-HWA-HWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?!? :giga::giga::giga:

naumadethis-nau.gif
 
"Muh men so scary, muh men are so dangerous, muh we need women-only spaces everywhere to protect us from scary men, muh all women are scared of all men so much men can't even imagine it, muh any men even raising their voices is terrifying to all women...:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:"

We all know how much feminists love pretending that men are terrifyingly aggressive and violent beasts, how all women are supposedly "socialized into fearing men", all men actually with no exceptions, and how even seeing a guy in a women's bathroom is something terrifying to women because they are "an oppressed class" and they can never feel safe with even a single man around. Absolutely all feminists do this, absolutely no feminist has a problem with demonizing men like this, the one and only, single point of contention is whether MTF trannies are scary men or poor, harmless, oppressed women. To libfems they are the latter, to TERFs they are the former (FTM trannies are the latter to both, nobody, absolutely nobody gives a shit about FTMs or actually sees them as men or whatever.)

So, why not look at some actual data:feelsaww:? I found this study when someone linked it in a thread on r/MensRights. A 2014, official EU-wide survey on violence against women. Because of course, nobody gives a shit about violence against men:feelsseriously:. Regardless, the survey divided the types of violence into two. Partner-perpetrated, which there was a lot of because European women's personality detectors are simply excellent and they can pick up on non-abuser traits to reject "boring" men who can't bring "excitement" into their lives, and non-partner-perpetrated, which is the actually scary one because in most cases you haven't brought it down on yourself unlike the former type:feelsUgh:.


After a crapload of text and other images, maps and so on, the survey actually gives us the most interesting finding. Sex of perpetrators of those stranger physical assaults on women, in percent:

View attachment 1229803

67% of the attacks were done by sole men, 26% by sole women, and 7% by at least one man and one woman. Leaving the latter alone, that leaves us with a 67:26 = roughly 2,5:1 or 5:2 ratio of male:female perpetrators of those attacks, meaning that for every five women attacked by men, there are two women attacked by other women. Adding in those 7%, this becomes almost a 2:1 ration, with 33% of all physical assaults on women done by people other than their partners having a woman as either the sole attacker or an accomplice to another male attacker.

And the best part?


Pushing and shoving was disproportionately done by men, hair-grabbing and pulling by women, and everything else had no significant gender difference.

So, what were those other types of assault?

View attachment 1229804

Taking the quoted paragraph into account, this means that slapping someone, beating someone with a fist or a hard object or kicking her, burning someone, suffocating/strangling someone, cutting, stabbing or shooting at someone or beating a woman's head against something were all roughly as likely to be done by men as they were to be done by women. Taking the absolute numbers into account of course, with female assailants only being present in 33% of those attacks. But still, no real gender difference in doing any of this.

But "Muh we need female-only spaces to feel safe:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:."

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

@DarkStar @GeckoBus @BlackCel_from_ZA @based_meme @reveries @To koniec @Copexodius Maximus @Anarcho Nihilist @Stupid Clown @Regenerator @Epedaphic @slavcel11 @kay' @Sloth22 @comradespiderman29 @Incline @Ron.Belgrade @PersonalityChad @Pancakecel
jokes aside, another giga iq thread :feelsautistic::feelsautistic::feelsautistic:
nigga on a run, mod when? :feelshehe::feelshehe::feelshehe:
 
And if anyone wants to see which people were doing that violence, where it was happening and how it is country-by-country...

View attachment 1229805View attachment 1229806View attachment 1229807View attachment 1229808
Dykes
"Muh men so scary, muh men are so dangerous, muh we need women-only spaces everywhere to protect us from scary men, muh all women are scared of all men so much men can't even imagine it, muh any men even raising their voices is terrifying to all women...:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:"

We all know how much feminists love pretending that men are terrifyingly aggressive and violent beasts, how all women are supposedly "socialized into fearing men", all men actually with no exceptions, and how even seeing a guy in a women's bathroom is something terrifying to women because they are "an oppressed class" and they can never feel safe with even a single man around. Absolutely all feminists do this, absolutely no feminist has a problem with demonizing men like this, the one and only, single point of contention is whether MTF trannies are scary men or poor, harmless, oppressed women. To libfems they are the latter, to TERFs they are the former (FTM trannies are the latter to both, nobody, absolutely nobody gives a shit about FTMs or actually sees them as men or whatever.)

So, why not look at some actual data:feelsaww:? I found this study when someone linked it in a thread on r/MensRights. A 2014, official EU-wide survey on violence against women. Because of course, nobody gives a shit about violence against men:feelsseriously:. Regardless, the survey divided the types of violence into two. Partner-perpetrated, which there was a lot of because European women's personality detectors are simply excellent and they can pick up on non-abuser traits to reject "boring" men who can't bring "excitement" into their lives, and non-partner-perpetrated, which is the actually scary one because in most cases you haven't brought it down on yourself unlike the former type:feelsUgh:.


After a crapload of text and other images, maps and so on, the survey actually gives us the most interesting finding. Sex of perpetrators of those stranger physical assaults on women, in percent:

View attachment 1229803

67% of the attacks were done by sole men, 26% by sole women, and 7% by at least one man and one woman. Leaving the latter alone, that leaves us with a 67:26 = roughly 2,5:1 or 5:2 ratio of male:female perpetrators of those attacks, meaning that for every five women attacked by men, there are two women attacked by other women. Adding in those 7%, this becomes almost a 2:1 ration, with 33% of all physical assaults on women done by people other than their partners having a woman as either the sole attacker or an accomplice to another male attacker.

And the best part?


Pushing and shoving was disproportionately done by men, hair-grabbing and pulling by women, and everything else had no significant gender difference.

So, what were those other types of assault?

View attachment 1229804

Taking the quoted paragraph into account, this means that slapping someone, beating someone with a fist or a hard object or kicking her, burning someone, suffocating/strangling someone, cutting, stabbing or shooting at someone or beating a woman's head against something were all roughly as likely to be done by men as they were to be done by women. Taking the absolute numbers into account of course, with female assailants only being present in 33% of those attacks. But still, no real gender difference in doing any of this.

But "Muh we need female-only spaces to feel safe:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:."

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

@DarkStar @GeckoBus @BlackCel_from_ZA @based_meme @reveries @To koniec @Copexodius Maximus @Anarcho Nihilist @Stupid Clown @Regenerator @Epedaphic @slavcel11 @kay' @Sloth22 @comradespiderman29 @Incline @Ron.Belgrade @PersonalityChad @Pancakecel
We need to solve this by allowing more trannies into female spaces to stop their bigoted attitudes. Wherever a woman goes, a tranny will be there.
8bf6d624451501922397efd6df43b9eb503c6f29773e0eb8052f84a82c0be512
 
Good finding man, thanks for the quick excellent analysis as always :feelsYall:

I personally never ever hurt anybody in my entire life, neither I had real intentions of doing so (some thoughts of hurting someone who previously hurt me - definitely, but I just brushed these thoughts off)

At the age of about 14 I started to be hyper aware of women on the streets in regards of how they may see me as a threat, if I walk behind them too long or there's nobody on the street but us and it's a night time, or if there's only two of us on the elevator, situations like that.
I always did my best to either get out of their way, pretend that I'm busy and don't see them (like on my phone or some shit) or to show I'm friendly by subtly smiling (which probably was a bad idea for my sub5 face) and things like that.

I only recently realised how fucked up this is. I never did anything to be treated like a threat. Teenage me just accepted this misandry without questioning back then.
 

Similar threads

P
Replies
2
Views
103
AvPDcel
A
Abuincelalfrogani
Replies
7
Views
252
VideoGameCoper
VideoGameCoper
D
Replies
4
Views
324
Dasein
D

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top