![WorthlessSlavicShit](/data/avatars/m/46/46934.jpg?1667255043)
WorthlessSlavicShit
Luminary
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2022
- Posts
- 11,201
"Muh men so scary, muh men are so dangerous, muh we need women-only spaces everywhere to protect us from scary men, muh all women are scared of all men so much men can't even imagine it, muh any men even raising their voices is terrifying to all women...![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
"
We all know how much feminists love pretending that men are terrifyingly aggressive and violent beasts, how all women are supposedly "socialized into fearing men", all men actually with no exceptions, and how even seeing a guy in a women's bathroom is something terrifying to women because they are "an oppressed class" and they can never feel safe with even a single man around. Absolutely all feminists do this, absolutely no feminist has a problem with demonizing men like this, the one and only, single point of contention is whether MTF trannies are scary men or poor, harmless, oppressed women. To libfems they are the latter, to TERFs they are the former (FTM trannies are the latter to both, nobody, absolutely nobody gives a shit about FTMs or actually sees them as men or whatever.)
So, why not look at some actual data
? I found this study when someone linked it in a thread on r/MensRights. A 2014, official EU-wide survey on violence against women. Because of course, nobody gives a shit about violence against men
. Regardless, the survey divided the types of violence into two. Partner-perpetrated, which there was a lot of because European women's personality detectors are simply excellent and they can pick up on non-abuser traits to reject "boring" men who can't bring "excitement" into their lives, and non-partner-perpetrated, which is the actually scary one because in most cases you haven't brought it down on yourself unlike the former type
.
After a crapload of text and other images, maps and so on, the survey actually gives us the most interesting finding. Sex of perpetrators of those stranger physical assaults on women, in percent:
67% of the attacks were done by sole men, 26% by sole women, and 7% by at least one man and one woman. Leaving the latter alone, that leaves us with a 67:26 = roughly 2,5:1 or 5:2 ratio of male:female perpetrators of those attacks, meaning that for every five women attacked by men, there are two women attacked by other women. Adding in those 7%, this becomes almost a 2:1 ration, with 33% of all physical assaults on women done by people other than their partners having a woman as either the sole attacker or an accomplice to another male attacker.
And the best part?
So, what were those other types of assault?
Taking the quoted paragraph into account, this means that slapping someone, beating someone with a fist or a hard object or kicking her, burning someone, suffocating/strangling someone, cutting, stabbing or shooting at someone or beating a woman's head against something were all roughly as likely to be done by men as they were to be done by women. Taking the absolute numbers into account of course, with female assailants only being present in 33% of those attacks. But still, no real gender difference in doing any of this.
But "Muh we need female-only spaces to feel safe![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
![FoidSoy :foidSoy: :foidSoy:]()
."
![FeelsKek :feelskek: :feelskek:]()
![FeelsKek :feelskek: :feelskek:]()
![FeelsKek :feelskek: :feelskek:]()
We all know how much feminists love pretending that men are terrifyingly aggressive and violent beasts, how all women are supposedly "socialized into fearing men", all men actually with no exceptions, and how even seeing a guy in a women's bathroom is something terrifying to women because they are "an oppressed class" and they can never feel safe with even a single man around. Absolutely all feminists do this, absolutely no feminist has a problem with demonizing men like this, the one and only, single point of contention is whether MTF trannies are scary men or poor, harmless, oppressed women. To libfems they are the latter, to TERFs they are the former (FTM trannies are the latter to both, nobody, absolutely nobody gives a shit about FTMs or actually sees them as men or whatever.)
So, why not look at some actual data
After a crapload of text and other images, maps and so on, the survey actually gives us the most interesting finding. Sex of perpetrators of those stranger physical assaults on women, in percent:
67% of the attacks were done by sole men, 26% by sole women, and 7% by at least one man and one woman. Leaving the latter alone, that leaves us with a 67:26 = roughly 2,5:1 or 5:2 ratio of male:female perpetrators of those attacks, meaning that for every five women attacked by men, there are two women attacked by other women. Adding in those 7%, this becomes almost a 2:1 ration, with 33% of all physical assaults on women done by people other than their partners having a woman as either the sole attacker or an accomplice to another male attacker.
And the best part?
Pushing and shoving was disproportionately done by men, hair-grabbing and pulling by women, and everything else had no significant gender difference.Comparing incidents of non-partner physical violence by form of violence used, incidents by a female perpetrator are more likely to involve grabbing the respondent or pulling her by her hair, compared with incidents by male perpetrators. Incidents where the perpetrator is male are more likely to include pushing or shoving the respondent. There are no other notable differences between male and female perpetrators in the forms of violence used.
So, what were those other types of assault?
Taking the quoted paragraph into account, this means that slapping someone, beating someone with a fist or a hard object or kicking her, burning someone, suffocating/strangling someone, cutting, stabbing or shooting at someone or beating a woman's head against something were all roughly as likely to be done by men as they were to be done by women. Taking the absolute numbers into account of course, with female assailants only being present in 33% of those attacks. But still, no real gender difference in doing any of this.
But "Muh we need female-only spaces to feel safe
@DarkStar @GeckoBus @BlackCel_from_ZA @based_meme @reveries @To koniec @Copexodius Maximus @Anarcho Nihilist @Stupid Clown @Regenerator @Epedaphic @slavcel11 @kay' @Sloth22 @comradespiderman29 @Incline @Ron.Belgrade @PersonalityChad @Pancakecel