Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News NYT author writes an opinion piece on redistributing sex, normies flip out in the comments

Total Imbecile

Total Imbecile

Honorary ethnic
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Posts
10,543
He quotes an incel:

one might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots-redistribution.html#commentsContainer


A true libertarian economist would realize that the best way to resolve a supply and demand issue in a market, here the sex market, would be to completely liberate women because the marketplace, as we're so crass to describe it, would clear itself without significant distribution issues if women didn't have to worry about sexual assault and had access to reproductive health care from places like Planned Parenthood

Ah yes, just let that sex trickle down

724.jpg



Equating income redistribution and sex redistribution is ridiculous. Income redistribution helps address genuine inequities - including the fact that, over the past fifty years in the US, workers' wages have risen much more slowly than their productivity, while profits have risen much more rapidly. "Sexual redistribution" addresses no such measurable inequity.

It does. It bridges the mental health gap between the sex havers and incels

The problem with this argument, as I see it, is that sex requires the assent of two people. The incels are not interested in securing the assent of women. They simply want to extract sex from them. This not only makes the interaction bizarre but, potentially, a felony. No one is entitled to violate the sanctity of another person's body without permission

So does extracting money from the rich, the feds will bust down your door if you dont pay your taxes JFL
Plus the government doesnt have to force women to have sex with incels, they can just give incels credits to spend on escorts

It seems to me the "incel" problem should be solved with therapy, not sex workers or robots. Incels seem to be people, mostly men, whose behaviors and attitudes towards others are so offensive and off putting that other humans are repulsed.

When I say therapy, I don't mean Internet chat rooms that reinforce aberrant behavior.

LOL its your personality bro, just work on your personality


And incels feel entitled to sex from only supermodel-perfect women. Their entire self-image is wrapped up in women-as-trophies, so other women are nothing as far as they are concerned.

Another strawman, Id settle for my looksmatch yesterday JFL

The scary thing about the incel agenda is that women are seen as only necessary for that one thing, like cows are for milk. And it ignores the real human need for connection beyond an exchange of goods and services.

Like the connection incels are missing out on? Ah yes


JFL at normies supporting socialism when it helps fill their pockets but not when it takes something from them

SEX IS A HUMAN RIGHT, I HAVE YET TO HEAR ONE VALID COUNTERARGUMENT TO THIS
 
one might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met.

The author is blackpilled af
 
They don't want to acknowledge that a system, wherein a considerable amount of men are depressed, suicidal, or homicidal because they can't have sex, is a broken system.
 
only enforced monogamy would fix this
it worked for centuries
 
They don't want to acknowledge that a system, wherein a considerable amount of men are depressed, suicidal, or homicidal because they can't have sex, is a broken system.
and then they just point to us and say "you arent entitled to anything!"
 
shit article, but its progress. at least SOME incel theory is getting into the mainstream.
 
Also looks theory may be even too blackpilled for mainstream publications. they will talk about incel topics but won't touch looks law, gene law, bone law.
 
Douthat's a good writer. And it's good to see Hanson's brilliance getting more play.

"Whether sex workers and sex robots can actually deliver real fulfillment is another matter. But that they will eventually be asked to do it, in service to a redistributive goal that for now still seems creepy or misogynist or radical, feels pretty much inevitable."

Feels good man.

Feels like progress.
 

Similar threads

WorthlessSlavicShit
Replies
66
Views
1K
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
19
Views
1K
Starfish Vs Koala
Starfish Vs Koala
littlemanhikicel
Replies
5
Views
292
littlemanhikicel
littlemanhikicel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top