Total Imbecile
Honorary ethnic
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2017
- Posts
- 10,543
He quotes an incel:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots-redistribution.html#commentsContainer
Ah yes, just let that sex trickle down
It does. It bridges the mental health gap between the sex havers and incels
So does extracting money from the rich, the feds will bust down your door if you dont pay your taxes JFL
Plus the government doesnt have to force women to have sex with incels, they can just give incels credits to spend on escorts
LOL its your personality bro, just work on your personality
Another strawman, Id settle for my looksmatch yesterday JFL
Like the connection incels are missing out on? Ah yes
JFL at normies supporting socialism when it helps fill their pockets but not when it takes something from them
SEX IS A HUMAN RIGHT, I HAVE YET TO HEAR ONE VALID COUNTERARGUMENT TO THIS
one might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots-redistribution.html#commentsContainer
A true libertarian economist would realize that the best way to resolve a supply and demand issue in a market, here the sex market, would be to completely liberate women because the marketplace, as we're so crass to describe it, would clear itself without significant distribution issues if women didn't have to worry about sexual assault and had access to reproductive health care from places like Planned Parenthood
Ah yes, just let that sex trickle down
Equating income redistribution and sex redistribution is ridiculous. Income redistribution helps address genuine inequities - including the fact that, over the past fifty years in the US, workers' wages have risen much more slowly than their productivity, while profits have risen much more rapidly. "Sexual redistribution" addresses no such measurable inequity.
It does. It bridges the mental health gap between the sex havers and incels
The problem with this argument, as I see it, is that sex requires the assent of two people. The incels are not interested in securing the assent of women. They simply want to extract sex from them. This not only makes the interaction bizarre but, potentially, a felony. No one is entitled to violate the sanctity of another person's body without permission
So does extracting money from the rich, the feds will bust down your door if you dont pay your taxes JFL
Plus the government doesnt have to force women to have sex with incels, they can just give incels credits to spend on escorts
It seems to me the "incel" problem should be solved with therapy, not sex workers or robots. Incels seem to be people, mostly men, whose behaviors and attitudes towards others are so offensive and off putting that other humans are repulsed.
When I say therapy, I don't mean Internet chat rooms that reinforce aberrant behavior.
LOL its your personality bro, just work on your personality
And incels feel entitled to sex from only supermodel-perfect women. Their entire self-image is wrapped up in women-as-trophies, so other women are nothing as far as they are concerned.
Another strawman, Id settle for my looksmatch yesterday JFL
The scary thing about the incel agenda is that women are seen as only necessary for that one thing, like cows are for milk. And it ignores the real human need for connection beyond an exchange of goods and services.
Like the connection incels are missing out on? Ah yes
JFL at normies supporting socialism when it helps fill their pockets but not when it takes something from them
SEX IS A HUMAN RIGHT, I HAVE YET TO HEAR ONE VALID COUNTERARGUMENT TO THIS