Blackpill Number of Tinder matches = Your Attractiveness Level

[ticktock]

The average male on tinder matches 1 in 115 swipes.

https://medium.com/@worstonlinedate...ably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a
Statistics show that the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men.

a formula was derived to estimate a man’s attractiveness level based on the percentage of “likes” he receives on Tinder:

attractiveness%=16.8*ln(like%)+52.3

If you tried Tinder, use this website to calculate your attractiveness level: http://www.wolframalpha.com/widgets/gallery/view.jsp?id=1f51953255f63027635d602d42b96718

I calculated mine and I got 68.3/100, close to 70/100 (top 30%) which is a little above average. Average is 50/100. My stats are 16 likes and swiped about 600 girls on Tinder so thats a 2.6% match rate. I've had 0 success using Tinder. I couldn't get a single date after being on it for about 2 weeks.

But the TOP 80% of women compete for the TOP 20% of MEN. I REPEAT TOP 20%, NO MORE THAN THAT. So being average and a little above average gets you no real results.

Getting tinder matches means NOTHING. If you can set up dates on Tinder, then you either won the lottery or are volcel that is in the 80th percentile in looks.

I am by no means bragging. I'm just showing that you can be average to a bit above average and still be incel (for online dating at least). If you are literally Chad, you get EVERYTHING.

I don't even think most men could get ugly girls off Tinder.
If you can hookup with a 3/10 on Tinder, I already deem you as attractive.

Girls on Tinder do smash. A lot!
240 of the 300 girls actually had sex through tinder! Only less than 50 of the 300 men
http://www.girlsaskguys.com/sexual-behav...mash-a-lot

Of course tinder is not real life but I believe is an accurate analysis on where your smv stands in online dating. I feel you can somehow correlate it to real life.

 

[Grotesque]

0

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

Average male says nothing anyway.

Maybe 114 get no matches at all and one chad 115. This is obviously exaggerated to illustrate my point.

I don't trust data from "liberal" companies.

 

[MaxZM98]

i would be lucky to get 1 match every 115 swipes. i am literally getting NO swipes at all. even fat and ugly girls think i am inferior to them even though i have been torturing myself at the gym for the last 6+ months JUST FOR THEM while they sit on their ass enjoying all the dick flying their way in their messages.

 

[TheyCallMeACreep]

I was never good with all that math shit but if 240 out 0f 300 women have sex does that mean that 240 guys had sex once or that those 50 guys had sex 4.8 times?

 

[Deleted member 1617]

why the fuck is tinder "not real life" but shitposting on incel forums is directly detected by feeeemales and being marked as "muhsoggykneest"

 

[Bronzehawkattack]

@Evil Genius

 

[Weightcel]

@Evil Genius

Lmao, don't call that coper in this thread.

 

[ticktock]

i would be lucky to get 1 match every 115 swipes. i am literally getting NO swipes at all. even fat and ugly girls think i am inferior to them even though i have been torturing myself at the gym for the last 6+ months JUST FOR THEM while they sit on their ass enjoying all the dick flying their way in their messages.

It's imbalanced as hell man. 8/10 Chads on tinder can get sex within a few msgs while slightly above average and below get no results. No idea why human DNA is like this. It's a major problem in this world if not the MAIN problem. Nobody is created equal.

 

[Deleted member 3385]

funny how the 80/20 rule keeps coming up in regards to dating, even with hard data, yet females continue to deny it

 

[ticktock]

I was never good with all that math shit but if 240 out 0f 300 women have sex does that mean that 240 guys had sex once or that those 50 guys had sex 4.8 times?

Obviously these girls only ride the 'CHAD' cock carousel. If you can't get a girl on Tinder to show sexual interest from the start, it's over. Girls only lust over CHAD.

I remember back when I didn't believe women like having sex. But after being black pilled I realized, WOMEN FUCKING LOVE SEX.. BUT ONLY WITH CHAD.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

I got 117 matches in a year, swiped thousands and couldn't set up a single date before getting ghosted. Matches indeed mean fuck all.

 

[ticktock]

funny how the 80/20 rule keeps coming up in regards to dating, even with hard data, yet females continue to deny it

Literally this is hardcore proof that women only fuck guys they perceive to have sex appeal. If you aren't being lusted over, sex will be nearly impossible to get. All of us wish to be desired. To be sexualized by women. Even just ONE woman. But human biology insists only the lucky guys with CHAD DNA get to have all the girls in the world...

 

[downunderlegattacks]

It doesn't end there guys,
even if you do match, there are bot accounts, then there is the uphill battle of them playing hard to get, them having 60 other dudes messaging them, them putting minimal conversation in, shittesting, and if it does all work out there is the date itself and how they will judge you there.

Then you get there, you take time out of your day, disrupt your schedule. Will she even show up? You have to buy the stuff.

Even if you make it past that, THERE IS STILL THE REDPILL/ETC PHASE. Can you keep her? You're looking over your shoulder because they are willing to monkey branch at a moments notice.

It's over.

 

[ticktock]

It doesn't end there guys,
even if you do match, there are bot accounts, then there is the uphill battle of them playing hard to get, them having 60 other dudes messaging them, them putting minimal conversation in, shittesting, and if it does all work out there is the date itself and how they will judge you there.

Then you get there, you take time out of your day, disrupt your schedule. Will she even show up? You have to buy the stuff.

Even if you make it past that, THERE IS STILL THE REDPILL/ETC PHASE. Can you keep her? You're looking over your shoulder because they are willing to monkey branch at a moments notice.

It's over.

Exactly. It sounds hopeless but that's just reality. You can only find true security in being a Chad.

 

[TheyCallMeACreep]

Obviously these girls only ride the 'CHAD' cock carousel. If you can't get a girl on Tinder to show sexual interest from the start, it's over. Girls only lust over CHAD.

I remember back when I didn't believe women like having sex. But after being black pilled I realized, WOMEN FUCKING LOVE SEX.. BUT ONLY WITH CHAD.

so the latter option?

 

[mylifeistrash]

pointless unless you specify a city

even then you could only swipe on fat ugly old women

 

[TrueAlphaMale]

Your smv is the total of the PSLs of the women you fucked. Fucking an 8/10 is the same as fucking two 4/10s.

 

[deadman123]

All that work for 0 matches

 

[37YearOldVirgin]

http://www.girlsaskguys.com/sexual-behav...mash-a-lot

Best comments on that linked article though:

'Exactly why girls are having trouble finding guys interested in relationships.

Why do I want to spend the time taking a girl on dates for a month when she had pornstar style sex on the first date with a random guy they met on tinder.

Girls generally have higher standards for the guys they hook up with than they do for the guys they seriously date. Guys are more willing to lower their standards so it's not surprising that the small group of guys who are the most desirable would get most of the hookups.'

'I mean hypergamy simply doesn't work in a feminist society, but you cannot change biology, and if this continues, more and more men are going to hate women, and loving relationships will be a thing of the past, because i dont know any sane guy who could actually love a woman if he knew that she had smashed lots of guys in the upper 20% and only settled with him because she wasn't good enough to secure any of those upper level guys for a relationship.

How could anyone love a girl who settles for you after she realizes that her own value is not represented by what kind of guys she can have sex with, but rather what kind of guy she can keep. If women knew this from the beginning they might decide to not smash the top guys in secret before settling down.'

'You know, most people were married in their early 20s as recently as the 1980s. Now it's something like 70% of people under 35 have never been married while half of all marriages end in divorce. 70% of those divorces are initiated by women.

A reasonable expectation of being able to have a family, children, and experience things like love, intimacy, etc., is really the only real bond most men have to their society. When enough of them realize that bond no longer exists, how long do you think the whole thing will last before those men burn it to the ground?'

And you know what's funny? The religious and more conservative communities figured this shit out thousands of years ago. You need to instantiate abstinence and monogamy in the law or enforce it socially at a societal level or the females of the species will run wild. Now birth control, progressive ideals, and Tinder have joined forces to destroy western civilization. And i say this as a Canadian secular liberal.