This is historically false. Nordic civilizations have always been barbarians and their highest cultural expression has been plunder and kingdoms devoid of poor culture and ultimately, a nation of barbarians who were forced to be of semi-isolation.
The largest empire in history, the British Empire, was the most aggressive, genocidal and thirsty of all humanity, And there you see them: the dominance of the Anglo-Saxon in the face of the defeat of Hispanicity.
Correct.
And look at how the Spanish or Meds(Southern Europeans/Whites) were when they landed in the Americas, they mixed heavily with the Native population.
Now let's compare that to what the Anglo-Celts did within North America; I wish the Meds had done this in LatAm.
Nordics weren't complete Barbarians though, here's some examples:
Scholars traditionally associate the advancement of Western culture from antiquity to the Renaissance with the innovations of the Romans and their Mediterranean cultural predecessors, the Greeks and Etruscans, to the extent that the word "civilization" often seems synonymous with Romanization. In doing so, historians unfairly discount the cultural achievements of other Indo-European peoples who achieved civilization in their own right and contributed much to ancient and modern life. One such people were the Celts, whose dominance in culture, politics, and trade once extended over a territory far larger than that of the later Roman empire, and whose legacy remains most intact in the Britannic archipelago – particularly on the island of Ireland, where the island's relative isolation from the cultural upheavals of continental Europe during and after the Roman period allowed the continued flourishing of Celtic culture.
The Scandinavians or "Vikings" also influenced a lot of NW Europes culture, in fact the term
Earl comes from that of
jarl which clearly indicates as to how they influenced much of NW Europes culture.
Vikings also were skilled sea-farers, lived in a very high-trust society, and discovered America before Columbus did.
Want to see something else interesting? This was a study done back in the past when racial-realism was more common:
This shows that out of the three main "White" or rather European groups, Nordics mog in terms of overall IQ.
Want to know something else interesting? Most of Frances nobility, as implied earlier, are descended from that of Normans & the such. As a result, France experienced a "De-Nordicization" process, which resulted in the country losing a lot of its innovative classes & thus experienced social decay:
At that time it was often enough to be blond to be dragged to the scaffold. The French Revolution must be read as an Alpine-Mediterranean rising against a noble and burgher upper class of Nordic race. Those who prepared and led the Revolution, however, were, it is noteworthy, often Nordic men. One of these leaders, Sieyès, himself of Nordic blood, must have realized the connexion between the Germanic conquest and the existence of a nobility; hence his exhortation to drive the nobles back again into the 'Frankish forests' whence they had come.
THE racial history of France is clearly written. The blood of Goths, Burgundians, Franks, and Normans gave France (the kingdom of the Franks) its best national strength. Montesquieu has said that all that France holds of honour, right, and freedom comes from the Franks. The French nobility had already been traced by Guizot to the Germanic immigrants, when Gobineau showed that the nobility of all the European peoples is to be traced to Germanic conquests. The truly Nordic achievement of Gothic architecture arose in northern France, when the population in the Middle Ages was still almost purely Nordic. The French nobility seems to have been less Nordic than that of other lands in the area of the Germanic conquests. A good deal of un-Nordic blood seems to have made its way into its ranks through relations with an ennobled but racially darker class belonging to late Gallo-Roman times.
In a novel I'm reading, the author regarded all Europeans(Med, Alpine which he used for Slav, and Dinaric iirc) as being White/European and of "good-stock" but argued that Nordics were the most high-achieving & also repelled MENA & Asiatic incursions into Europe.
It was also a "Nordic" or rather Germanic peoples who toppled Rome: Some incorrectly believe Rome was Nordic, but this has been refuted & modern Mediterranids are still the descendants of these civilizations.
@copemaxx9002
