Since the normies and the media control the narrative, they control the language as well. Oftentimes we are referred to as members of some organization known as "incel", implying that it is a voluntary association. Or some morons will claim they have "left" incel, or fell down the "path" of inceldom, or joined the incel "movement". None of these are true. No one posting on this forum is a member of "incel".
The point is that incel is a classification that defies voluntary self-association, ironically "involuntary" is even part of the definition. You can't cure cancer by self-identifying as a healthy person, can't get a Ferrari by self-identifying as a rich man, nor can you get sex by identifying as a "voluntary" celibate.
People who publicly self-identify as incel have already been outed as fakecel, but the truth is irrelevant when you're trying to spin a narrative. They are strawmen who the normies can pick apart by blaming their personalities, hygiene, and everything other than their looks, simply by not being atrociously ugly but also not attractive enough to get no-strings-attached sex.
Involuntary celibacy is simply a social phenomenon arising from the new globalized, homogenized, hypercapitalist society we live in. The problem is everyone wants to blame someone else for their problems, including other incels in denial, it is just human nature. The demonization of inceldom is caused by normies not getting laid or struggling to do so. For every blackpilled incel, there are ten incels in denial, trying to put others down to elevate themselves. They will brag that they got a cold-hearted peck on the cheek or reluctant pity sex, and then claim they aren't incel.
There's truly nothing we did to deserve inceldom, other than being born with unaesthetic facial bones. Even if it were true that personality matters (it doesn't), who is to say that it isn't a product of life circumstances out of our control? After all, nobody chooses to be incel, as it was never a choice to begin with.
The point is that incel is a classification that defies voluntary self-association, ironically "involuntary" is even part of the definition. You can't cure cancer by self-identifying as a healthy person, can't get a Ferrari by self-identifying as a rich man, nor can you get sex by identifying as a "voluntary" celibate.
People who publicly self-identify as incel have already been outed as fakecel, but the truth is irrelevant when you're trying to spin a narrative. They are strawmen who the normies can pick apart by blaming their personalities, hygiene, and everything other than their looks, simply by not being atrociously ugly but also not attractive enough to get no-strings-attached sex.
Involuntary celibacy is simply a social phenomenon arising from the new globalized, homogenized, hypercapitalist society we live in. The problem is everyone wants to blame someone else for their problems, including other incels in denial, it is just human nature. The demonization of inceldom is caused by normies not getting laid or struggling to do so. For every blackpilled incel, there are ten incels in denial, trying to put others down to elevate themselves. They will brag that they got a cold-hearted peck on the cheek or reluctant pity sex, and then claim they aren't incel.
There's truly nothing we did to deserve inceldom, other than being born with unaesthetic facial bones. Even if it were true that personality matters (it doesn't), who is to say that it isn't a product of life circumstances out of our control? After all, nobody chooses to be incel, as it was never a choice to begin with.
