F
True love is about your inner emotions going outward and bonding with another person who loves you for your distinctive personal characteristics. independent from all things that you produce/ lead up to with your existence, the main essentiality behind the relationship is the two and their company. The expression of the person themselves. The personality, the commonality, the inner essence aspects/ outward expressions from your personality/ identity.
This never happens. Women only care about the utility/ primality capital in of itself. How you stack up based on their own standards that hold a package of high utility. It's never really predicated on just your inner essence. Fuck no, it's about all of the other characteristics/ traits.
A female's aim is about the utility/ the wonderment and thrill/ power/ primal capital etc. There is no love that is entirely predicated on just person to person bondship. It also depends on your outward utility/ status/ power/ etc. It's not disneyfied. There are always beta losers in disney movies. It's just peripheral. It's always the good looking couple the screen is honed in on. But that hardly makes the kind of inner bond they have universal as the defining trait for love. Just look at the outside world.
The notion a relationship can just be pillared on non-material traits, and to have a perfectly comfortable footing while being yourself instead of being successful and dominant is totally naive. People suck. End of discussion. You need to have rising grounds by being bloodpilled/ blackpilled. Then you must proceed with redpill rage/ aspirations to gain the power you so rightfully deserve.
Inner nature bond formation/ pillared on the person alone traits are never the essential part of any or most relationships. Anyone can have an inner nature that's charming if you work well enough at it. Pua/ swagmastering/ Chilloofness/ Chillaxity/ humorous guy gaming/ etc. A lot of that is very producible to women, and thus not primality pyramid status special. Comes off desperate and compensatory. Maybe flamboyantly faggish. They want traits someone is bolted in with, or are extremely uncommon and are high up as primality/ dominancy capital indicators. Unproducible primality value like genetics and producible primality value like money. Having that makes you look more socially supreme/ remarkable. They want the novelty of that most of all. Women want distinct rarity traits garnered by your unattainable/ unproducible traits like looks, status, great and powerful lineal/ familianl/ genetic history, etc. Being chad/ being big/ having good genes are the ultimate indicator of you having winning streak savvy motor skills/ abilities/ power/ genetics/ etc.
If personality game actually works, then women will hormonally hunger for unproducible primality prodigy eventually. It's a ticking time bomb that you gotta rush zerg style in order to get the most benefit, and maybe entrap her with a good gene kid and have whole status-up fulfillment from the engagement.
Unproducible/ or nigh such is worth 5x to women than having competency/ aptitude in something that can be remotely producible. They want something special on the primal status scales that makes you seem more like a natural prodigy. To women, the dimensions of hierarchies are divided by a pyramid where the tops are "have the rare and remarkable" and those who mostly "have the common and characterless".
This never happens. Women only care about the utility/ primality capital in of itself. How you stack up based on their own standards that hold a package of high utility. It's never really predicated on just your inner essence. Fuck no, it's about all of the other characteristics/ traits.
A female's aim is about the utility/ the wonderment and thrill/ power/ primal capital etc. There is no love that is entirely predicated on just person to person bondship. It also depends on your outward utility/ status/ power/ etc. It's not disneyfied. There are always beta losers in disney movies. It's just peripheral. It's always the good looking couple the screen is honed in on. But that hardly makes the kind of inner bond they have universal as the defining trait for love. Just look at the outside world.
The notion a relationship can just be pillared on non-material traits, and to have a perfectly comfortable footing while being yourself instead of being successful and dominant is totally naive. People suck. End of discussion. You need to have rising grounds by being bloodpilled/ blackpilled. Then you must proceed with redpill rage/ aspirations to gain the power you so rightfully deserve.
Inner nature bond formation/ pillared on the person alone traits are never the essential part of any or most relationships. Anyone can have an inner nature that's charming if you work well enough at it. Pua/ swagmastering/ Chilloofness/ Chillaxity/ humorous guy gaming/ etc. A lot of that is very producible to women, and thus not primality pyramid status special. Comes off desperate and compensatory. Maybe flamboyantly faggish. They want traits someone is bolted in with, or are extremely uncommon and are high up as primality/ dominancy capital indicators. Unproducible primality value like genetics and producible primality value like money. Having that makes you look more socially supreme/ remarkable. They want the novelty of that most of all. Women want distinct rarity traits garnered by your unattainable/ unproducible traits like looks, status, great and powerful lineal/ familianl/ genetic history, etc. Being chad/ being big/ having good genes are the ultimate indicator of you having winning streak savvy motor skills/ abilities/ power/ genetics/ etc.
If personality game actually works, then women will hormonally hunger for unproducible primality prodigy eventually. It's a ticking time bomb that you gotta rush zerg style in order to get the most benefit, and maybe entrap her with a good gene kid and have whole status-up fulfillment from the engagement.
Unproducible/ or nigh such is worth 5x to women than having competency/ aptitude in something that can be remotely producible. They want something special on the primal status scales that makes you seem more like a natural prodigy. To women, the dimensions of hierarchies are divided by a pyramid where the tops are "have the rare and remarkable" and those who mostly "have the common and characterless".
