Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill NiggER drops supERnova blackpill, and explains why so many people (particularly men) are single in the modERn ERa.

IncelKing

IncelKing

Chaos is a laddER
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
9,664

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Crv-bnqNPlK/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==


ModERn inceldom is a phenomenon which has Been socially engineered by the elites.

They have intentionally designed and created a society where most people are single, because single people are greatER consumERs which means that a society with a highER pERcentage of single people will be MORE economically beneficial for corporations and govERnment (elites of society).

Elites have increased the percentage of single people in society, by breaking down the relationship between men and women, primarily through feminism.

Feminism gave women the right to work and own propERty, this made the avERage woman less dependant on a man’s resources for survival, decreasing men’s ability to use their matERial resources as levERage to attract women, thus making it much more difficult for men to fulfill their natural role of being the providER.

an avERage man in patriarchal times would be able to find an avERage wife. But in the modERn feminist ERa, most men with avERage income are single and invisible to the avERage woman.


if you wanted to create a structurally flawed house (which is made from only ONE type of brick), all you’d have to do is make the BRICK faulty, and the WHOLE HOUSE would end up being faulty.

In the same way a house is composed of many individual bricks, society is composed of many individual families. So if you want to weaken society, the best way to do it is by destroying the “family unit”, because the family unit is the BUILDING BLOCK of society.

Feminism was created to destroy the family unit and therefore weaken society as a whole, making it easiER for the elite Jew ruling class to maintain their control and influence ovER the slave class.
 
Last edited:
@Transcended Trucel
 
The brick analogy is a nice one. If I may I'd like to extend it by adding that a single brick is like a tight family unit, where a single person is just a single component of the brick, in the general shape of a brick (i.e. structurally compatible with bricks) but twice as voluminous. It lacks the structural (in this case also functional) integrity but occupies twice the space. You can build a house with less of them, although the house will be weaker, but still a house you can sell. Those at the top care about the selling part, less so that the structure is weak.
 
@Transcended Trucel
The brick analogy is a nice one. If I may I'd like to extend it by adding that a single brick is like a tight family unit, where a single person is just a single component of the brick, in the general shape of a brick (i.e. structurally compatible with bricks) but twice as voluminous. It lacks the structural (in this case also functional) integrity but occupies twice the space. You can build a house with less of them, although the house will be weaker, but still a house you can sell. Those at the top care about the selling part, less so that the structure is weak.
agreed. These scum want profit above all else. And destroying the family unit allowed them to get that $$$. same reason they push tranny movement. A tranny is a life long customer of medical bullshit. Massive cash cow. Every tranny made is 1 million dollars locked in over a few decades.
 
foids are the biggest consumers which is why the pushed the nuclear family in the past so while the husband wagesalved the foid was home watching tv and seeing the latest goyslop to buy, now foids make their own cash so they are going to make foids the new workforce majority while men rot so they can sell more slop, its ovER
 
The brick analogy is a nice one. If I may I'd like to extend it by adding that a single brick is like a tight family unit, where a single person is just a single component of the brick, in the general shape of a brick (i.e. structurally compatible with bricks) but twice as voluminous. It lacks the structural (in this case also functional) integrity but occupies twice the space. You can build a house with less of them, although the house will be weaker, but still a house you can sell. Those at the top care about the selling part, less so that the structure is weak.

Exactly, the sellER of the house will sell a faulty product if it makes more profit than selling a safe product. But it’s the consumer who misses out because not only do they pay more money, but they have to live in an unsafe house which could collapse on top of them at any moment.

Same thing happening in society. Through the implementation of feminism, Elites (sellERs) have created a society whERe thERe are a lot of single people, because it drives consumERism and makes the elites richER.

Unfortunately, this negatively affects the consumERs (both men AND women), because it results in women being reduced to a life of being a wage-slave for govERnment/corporations (compared to the patriarchy which enabled women to relax at home while the man worked), and also because single men became a workER-drone/slave undERclass to do all the dangERous/risky jobs or fight and die in wars, all while being deprived of a female partnER despite their contribution to society.

Elites prospERed, avERage citizen (whether male or female), experienced a DECREASE in quality of life.
 
Last edited:
Too much gender neutral language.

"No one consumes more than a single person" you know damn well you mean to say single woman but you caught yourself and cucked out. Women make up the vast majority of consumer purchases.
 
It also plays into the lowering of population growth and limiting total population. Something which governments have spoken openly about being a "problem".
 
Too much gender neutral language.

"No one consumes more than a single person" you know damn well you mean to say single woman but you caught yourself and cucked out. Women make up the vast majority of consumer purchases.

Actually single men consume MORE than married men.

Married men genERally pay for MOST/ALL of the rent/mortgage, utility bills, clothes, food etc. but those expenses are for BOTH him AND his wife.

Single men pay their own bills, and on top of that they waste thousands of dollars on prostitutes evERy year.

Being a frequent escortmaxxER is more expensive than having a wife, in the long-tERm
 
They have intentionally designed and created a society where most people are single, because single people are greatER consumERs which means that a society with a highER pERcentage of single people will be MORE economically beneficial for corporations and govERnment (elites of society).

Although I agree with the general context of the thread, I don't think this part is true. When a man is married he spents lots of money to fulfuill the desires of his woman and also with your family if he have children. An lonely man generaly speaking is minimalist, a small appartament with some last generation videogame or a PC gamer , some food and some beer in the weekend would be enough for him to have a "good life".

The things is, foids is the biggest consumers in this earth. Single man saves more money.
 
Although I agree with the general context of the thread, I don't think this part is true. When a man is married he spents lots of money to fulfuill the desires of his woman and also with your family if he have children. An lonely man generaly speaking is minimalist, a small appartament with some last generation videogame or a PC gamer , some food and some beer in the weekend would be enough for him to have a "good life".

The things is, foids is the biggest consumers in this earth. Single man saves more money.

When I say single men consume more than married men, I’m NOT talking about the jobless NEET losER single men who cope with video games and porn in their parents’ basement.

I’m talking about single men who either work or run a business, and end up spending a big portion of their salary on escorts (whores/prostitutes).

A single man with a stable income who frequently visits whores/prostitutes will spend more money in his lifetime than a married man.
 
By his reasoning, this website it part of the "trap" of gender wars. Of the billions of foids on the planet, how many have you found to "rock with" yet?

I'd say this is more redpilled than anything. He's effectively advocating betabux.
 
Last edited:
Actually single men consume MORE than married men.

Married men genERally pay for MOST/ALL of the rent/mortgage, utility bills, clothes, food etc. but those expenses are for BOTH him AND his wife.

Single men pay their own bills, and on top of that they waste thousands of dollars on prostitutes evERy year.

Being a frequent escortmaxxER is more expensive than having a wife, in the long-tERm
Women account for like 80% of consumER purchases. I see your point but it also needs to be considERed that men produce more than women and pay more taxes while women receive more public benefits. Also men are more homeless. The men who consume are generally producing in proportion with that or better.

It's two sides of a coin. I can't deny that men are big contributers.

It's a vampire economy where bluepill/redpill (two sides of the same capsule) normie males produce in order to enable the feminine archetypes such as women and jews. The simp is to the female as the goyim is to the jew.
 
Last edited:

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Crv-bnqNPlK/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==


ModERn inceldom is a phenomenon which has Been socially engineered by the elites.

They have intentionally designed and created a society where most people are single, because single people are greatER consumERs which means that a society with a highER pERcentage of single people will be MORE economically beneficial for corporations and govERnment (elites of society).

Elites have increased the percentage of single people in society, by breaking down the relationship between men and women, primarily through feminism.

Feminism gave women the right to work and own propERty, this made the avERage woman less dependant on a man’s resources for survival, decreasing men’s ability to use their matERial resources as levERage to attract women, thus making it much more difficult for men to fulfill their natural role of being the providER.

an avERage man in patriarchal times would be able to find an avERage wife. But in the modERn feminist ERa, most men with avERage income are single and invisible to the avERage woman.


if you wanted to create a structurally flawed house (which is made from only ONE type of brick), all you’d have to do is make the BRICK faulty, and the WHOLE HOUSE would end up being faulty.

In the same way a house is composed of many individual bricks, society is composed of many individual families. So if you want to weaken society, the best way to do it is by destroying the “family unit”, because the family unit is the BUILDING BLOCK of society.

Feminism was created to destroy the family unit and therefore weaken society as a whole, making it easiER for the elite Jew ruling class to maintain their control and influence ovER the slave class.

This isn't true, dual income households spend a lot more because FOIDS WANT MATERIAL GOODS

I can live on like $1000 a month if i want.
 
foids are the biggest consumers which is why the pushed the nuclear family in the past so while the husband wagesalved the foid was home watching tv and seeing the latest goyslop to buy, now foids make their own cash so they are going to make foids the new workforce majority while men rot so they can sell more slop, its ovER
couldnt agree more, its over
 
Tracee Ellis Ross Lol GIF by BET
THE ER IS KILLING ME
 
Actually single men consume MORE than married men.

Married men genERally pay for MOST/ALL of the rent/mortgage, utility bills, clothes, food etc. but those expenses are for BOTH him AND his wife.

Single men pay their own bills, and on top of that they waste thousands of dollars on prostitutes evERy year.

Being a frequent escortmaxxER is more expensive than having a wife, in the long-tERm
that's because married men don't consume jack shit. all their money go to their useless roastie wife, and is spended in dumb "live, laugh, love" crap. single men may consume more in comparison but they spend much less. and consuming good copes to make life somewhat enjoyable.
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
7
Views
356
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
sultryloser
Replies
35
Views
679
highschoolcel
highschoolcel
W
Replies
13
Views
179
WhitePilledRage
WhitePilledRage

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top