men will convince themselves of anything to cope with not being Chad in 2019
New trend: Incels coping by calling themselves “volcels”
men will convince themselves of anything to cope with not being Chad in 2019
If that's actually him in that picture he might be telling the truth, but still doesn't Change the fact that he's a faggot
jfl, theres not such a thing as volcel unless you are a monk or some shit
seems similar to MGTOW
And Wizchan after the early years. The only good thing about that coper shithole is that someone posted a link to incels.me (when it was called that) and that's how I found this place.
I am confident that the incel/volcel split is a false dichotomy enforced by jews/feminists to bifurcate the manosphere and turn us against each other.
There's no perfect volcel and no perfect incel, all celibates are both in proportions which vary over time.
Example:
9/10 guy only wants to fuck 10/10 girls, but no 10/10 girls will fuck him
he is "incel" to the 10/10 girls, and "volcel" to girls ranking from 1-9
3/10 guy willing to fuck girls 2 or higher, but only 1/10s want to fuck him:
he is "incel" to girls 2+, and volcel to the 1/10s
To be a "perfect volcel" you would need ascertain that 100% of women willing to fuck you, so you are turning down them all.
To be a "perfect incel" you would need to ascertain that 0% are willing to fuck you, so they are all turning you down.
Neither absolute is ascertainable, so both ideas are exaggerated approximations.
They are useful to represent general ideas, moreso, like for example:
Approximate volcel: "90% of women want to fuck me, but I choose not to have sex with them. I might want to fuck the 10% who don't"
Approximate incel: "10% of women want to fuck me, but I choose not to have sex with them. I might want to fuck the 90% who don't"
Which one to use becomes increasingly confusing as a man's opportunities approach 50/50.
You also do have the problem of guys who are more toward the 10% end cope-RPing that they have 90% odds, to online-brag or feel better.
On the other hand, you have guys who might possibly be able to fuck 1 in 1000 women pretending they have ZERO opportunities to fit some kind of perfect-incel archtype which realistically just can't exist unless you're a quadriplegic in solitary confinement.
There's no perfect volcel and no perfect incel, all celibates are both in proportions which vary over time.
Example:
9/10 guy only wants to fuck 10/10 girls, but no 10/10 girls will fuck him
he is "incel" to the 10/10 girls, and "volcel" to girls ranking from 1-9
3/10 guy willing to fuck girls 2 or higher, but only 1/10s want to fuck him:
he is "incel" to girls 2+, and volcel to the 1/10s
To be a "perfect volcel" you would need ascertain that 100% of women willing to fuck you, so you are turning down them all.
To be a "perfect incel" you would need to ascertain that 0% are willing to fuck you, so they are all turning you down.
Neither absolute is ascertainable, so both ideas are exaggerated approximations.
They are useful to represent general ideas, moreso, like for example:
Approximate volcel: "90% of women want to fuck me, but I choose not to have sex with them. I might want to fuck the 10% who don't"
Approximate incel: "10% of women want to fuck me, but I choose not to have sex with them. I might want to fuck the 90% who don't"
Which one to use becomes increasingly confusing as a man's opportunities approach 50/50.
You also do have the problem of guys who are more toward the 10% end cope-RPing that they have 90% odds, to online-brag or feel better.
On the other hand, you have guys who might possibly be able to fuck 1 in 1000 women pretending they have ZERO opportunities to fit some kind of perfect-incel archtype which realistically just can't exist unless you're a quadriplegic in solitary confinement.
Link doesn't work.
But when we say "volcel" we mean that SOMEONE wants to fuck you. That's why we say femcels don't exist. Because SOMEONE wants to fuck them. Maybe not Chad, but what about one of us?
But when we say "volcel" we mean that SOMEONE wants to fuck you. That's why we say femcels don't exist. Because SOMEONE wants to fuck them. Maybe not Chad, but what about one of us?
Theoretically if we were willing to go into the deepest gutters, alter our behaviors to misrepresent our personalities, I think many here could inspire some desire in a woman who is incredibly promiscuous and desperate.
I think many put forth impressive efforts to try and ascend, but I doubt anyone has truly put forth 100% efforts to delve deep in the bottom ⅒% of humanity far below our looksmatches with getting sex from any hole whatsoever being the sole priority.
To RP like that sort of denies our complexity, that we might have some shred of standards, a minimum requirement of decency in a partner that we want, however inclusive that might be.
I mean, we might say we are incel in respect to 99% of women, but there probably is 1% of women most here are volcel toward. Hell, even uberchad probably has 1% of women he is incel in respect to (perhaps they are fucking Double-Uber-Chad instead), despite getting laid nightly with the other 99%.
I think many put forth impressive efforts to try and ascend, but I doubt anyone has truly put forth 100% efforts to delve deep in the bottom ⅒% of humanity far below our looksmatches with getting sex from any hole whatsoever being the sole priority.
To RP like that sort of denies our complexity, that we might have some shred of standards, a minimum requirement of decency in a partner that we want, however inclusive that might be.
I mean, we might say we are incel in respect to 99% of women, but there probably is 1% of women most here are volcel toward. Hell, even uberchad probably has 1% of women he is incel in respect to (perhaps they are fucking Double-Uber-Chad instead), despite getting laid nightly with the other 99%.
This tweet is unavailable.
D
I coped this way till i was 19 i thought that women didn't care that much about the face, that i was virgin because i was shy etc lmao
There's a bit of feedback loop, pretty sure there would be a correlation between being ugly and being shy.
Approximate incel: "0.1% of women want to fuck me, but I choose not to have sex with them. I want to fuck the 99.9% who don't want to fuck me"
Better?
Nobody can feasibly prove that 60yo 900lb shaneequa doesn't want their cock. I bet nobody here's even tried.
fakecels out
Approximate incel: "0.1% of women want to fuck me, but I choose not to have sex with them. I want to fuck the 99.9% who don't want to fuck me"
Better?
Nobody can feasibly prove that 60yo 900lb shaneequa doesn't want their cock. I bet nobody here's even tried.
I
Faggot normie. Doesn't get shit anyway, delusion to protect the ego in claiming "volcel".
Based and volcelpilled
Yeah I am desperate to fuck any girl on earth sometimes
D
*unless you're a CHAD monk
Volcel is no trend, it's a thing since r/incels. Im not sure but last year i just gave up on ascending so i think im kinda of a volcel.
I know it FEELS that way bro, but that's just our desperation driving us to make exaggerated comments.
Sort of like "I'm so hungry I would eat anything put in front of me!" but you probably still would not eat poop, so how can you say you love her?
The thing is: I don't think it's necessary to give up on ascension to be volcel. Merely having even the most minor of standards that reduce sexual opportunity is a form of choice preventing sexual accomplishment. For example:
1) I don't want to fuck a guy
2) I don't want to fuck an alligator
3) I don't want to be a rapist
4) I don't want to rent a whore
5) I don't want to fuck HIV positive negresses addicted to crack
These preferences smack of voluntariness. We only avoid that by perceiving feelings as non-choices, as who we get boners for being an involuntary thing.
But then I ask you: if you only get boners for 10s, and turn down 9s because you get no boners for them: are you an incel? That doesn't feel very incel to me!
If taking an approach of
"not trying to fuck people I'm not horny for isn't a choice because I couldn't have fucked them anyway since there would be no boner to do it with"
That naturally leads to mean that turning down 9s because you're only for 10s would be incel, and I think it ruins the primary meaning of the term, which is a lack of comparative overall opportunity and means.
Also the problem with the 'no boner' approach is that viagra exists, so you could take viagra and stick your dick into a 90 year old HIV+ man if you wanted a sex-at-all-choices thing.
What we're actually yearning for isn't merely sex, but rather sex with someone who we find attractive, and that deserves a term better than sex, like SUPERSEX.
A lack of SUPERSEX should be called SUPERCELIBACY and so incels of supercelibacy should be called insupercels?
MSTOW
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
