Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News New proto-cel found, John Locke

DostoevskyCel

DostoevskyCel

Officer
Joined
Mar 18, 2021
Posts
551
4ECA1CA8 8CCF 4320 AF32 72ADAE937DF2

Pop philosophers call him the father of liberalism, but this is a cliché. Locke was an advocate of social and cultural unity via religion, common goals, and political fairness. Furthermore, he has one of the first known uses of the tolerance paradox, the idea that a tolerant society must not tolerate intolerance:

‘Although Locke was an advocate of tolerance, he urged the authorities not to tolerate atheism, because he thought the denial of God's existence would undermine the social order and lead to chaos.’

Locke also laid out, a priori, a very modern interpretation of education and belief systems, stating that all are born with a tabula rasa (a mental blank slate) unto which ideas and belief systems are imposed, which builds the belief systems of a person. This regrettably inspired many future political theorists, like Gramsci, who abuse this notion of tabula rasa to reason that in order for communist revolution to occur in the west, students must be indoctrinated and culture must be infested.

Most importantly, Locke died a virgin, perhaps birthing the tradition along with Newton, later to be assumed by many Germans, of incel philosophers. Interestingly, Locke and Newton both leaned towards a non trinitarian view of Christianity, and were likely interlocutors.
 
Newton is cool, but fuck John Locke, I'm serious as a heart attack. It was John Locke that ushered in the destruction of monarchy in favor of democracy later creating classical liberalism which gave birth to all the modern horror freak shows we have now.

In fact, if somebody took a time machine to the past and killed John Locke we could still be enjoying monarchy today.

Also, for shits and giggles, I would like Thomas Hobbes from the same historical period to challenge John Locke to a cage fight to the death. Hands down Hobbes would win, and in a better timeline Hobbes would of got more noteworthy credit intellectually that he in my mind rightfully deserved. [Very unappreciated writer Thomas Hobbes which is an intellectual travesty. He's right up there with Niccolo Machiavelli.]
 
Last edited:
I remember when I had to study him in high school philosophy class, I didn't like it too much tbh, I found Locke boring compared to the Greek classic philosophers. Hobbes was cool though now that we're talking about English philosophers. But the worst of all was Descartes, so hard and I found some of his ideas incredibly stupid like the evil genius hypothesis (I think it was called like that). Luckily we didn't study Kant because I always heard he's the hardest to understand.
 
Weird tbh. The US never was a monarchy as far as I know. Or maybe you talking about when the English were taxing your tea ?
Better the English crown than this Marxist faggot loving global-homo democratic republic of ours. Hell, even a Mexican monarchy as much as it pains me to say it would be an improvement at this point. [I would even get to wear a sombrero.]
 
Last edited:
Newton is cool, but fuck John Locke, I'm serious as a heart attack. It was John Locke that ushered in the destruction of monarchy in favor of democracy later creating classical liberalism which gave birth to all the modern horror freak shows we have now.

In fact, if somebody took a time machine to the past and killed John Locke we could still be enjoying monarchy today.

Also, for shits and giggles, I would like Thomas Hobbes from the same historical period to challenge John Locke to a cage fight to the death. Hands down Hobbes would win, and in a better timeline Hobbes would of got more noteworthy credit intellectually that he in my mind rightfully deserved. [Very unappreciated writer Thomas Hobbes which is an intellectual travesty. He's right up there with Niccolo Machiavelli.]
I get this viewpoint, but from what I’ve read he only regarded James II’s divine rule of kings idea to be bs, he just wanted government less involved and less oppressive, plus the parliamentary revolution had just happened so it feels like it was just a topical thing.
 
Isaac Newton - Average Incel
Jon Locke - Average ITcel

both in similar situations, except one is based and the other advocated for downfall of society
 
I remember when I had to study him in high school philosophy class, I didn't like it too much tbh, I found Locke boring compared to the Greek classic philosophers. Hobbes was cool though now that we're talking about English philosophers. But the worst of all was Descartes, so hard and I found some of his ideas incredibly stupid like the evil genius hypothesis (I think it was called like that). Luckily we didn't study Kant because I always heard he's the hardest to understand.
Cogito ergo sum, that idea of Descartes is really weird, but it was part of a greater idea of his wasn’t it, Pensées, to get rid of everything we think we know and build the axioms again from the ground up. Kant’s ideas are more puffed up in flowery language but overall is one of the better continentals, and Locke’s ideas are boring because America was founded on Locke’s philosophy so you’re essentially learning the philosophy behind the America constitution etc
Isaac Newton - Average Incel
Jon Locke - Average ITcel

both in similar situations, except one is based and the other advocated for downfall of society
To be fair to him, liberalism from 1700-1900 wasn’t bad, especially in the Dutch republic it was great, it’s only post war soyboyery, Jewry, neoliberalism and neomarxism which have corrupted society today
 
Hell, even a Mexican monarchy as much as it pains me to say it would be an improvement at this point. [I would even get to wear a sombrero.]
Gigabased :dab::dab:

as roma GIF
 
I remember when I had to study him in high school philosophy class, I didn't like it too much tbh, I found Locke boring compared to the Greek classic philosophers. Hobbes was cool though now that we're talking about English philosophers. But the worst of all was Descartes, so hard and I found some of his ideas incredibly stupid like the evil genius hypothesis (I think it was called like that). Luckily we didn't study Kant because I always heard he's the hardest to understand.
Kant never had sex during his whole life.
 
[UWSL]Locke and Newton both leaned towards a non trinitarian view of Christianity, and were likely interlocutors.[/UWSL]
Based and Islam pilled? @RREEEEEEEEE


View attachment 453148
Pop philosophers call him the father of liberalism, but this is a cliché. Locke was an advocate of social and cultural unity via religion, common goals, and political fairness. Furthermore, he has one of the first known uses of the tolerance paradox, the idea that a tolerant society must not tolerate intolerance:

‘Although Locke was an advocate of tolerance, he urged the authorities not to tolerate atheism, because he thought the denial of God's existence would undermine the social order and lead to chaos.’

Locke also laid out, a priori, a very modern interpretation of education and belief systems, stating that all are born with a tabula rasa (a mental blank slate) unto which ideas and belief systems are imposed, which builds the belief systems of a person. This regrettably inspired many future political theorists, like Gramsci, who abuse this notion of tabula rasa to reason that in order for communist revolution to occur in the west, students must be indoctrinated and culture must be infested.

Most importantly, Locke died a virgin, perhaps birthing the tradition along with Newton, later to be assumed by many Germans, of incel philosophers. Interestingly, Locke and Newton both leaned towards a non trinitarian view of Christianity, and were likely interlocutors.
The blank state theory has been pretty much proven to be wrong now.
Isaac Newton - Average Incel
Jon Locke - Average ITcel

both in similar situations, except one is based and the other advocated for downfall of society
None of them are similar to IT cause they weren’t preying on children.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top