Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Natural selection is eternal and unpreventable

Disillusioned

Disillusioned

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 18, 2018
Posts
1,163
There is absolutely nothing that can be done to prevent natural selection from taking place. Nothing. No political system, no government policy, and no ideology can prevent the inferior from ending up at the bottom of society. Natural selection and evolution is just a basic universal law of nature just like gravity. It's always going to exist. Even current modern day attempts at reducing inequality such as the welfare state is doing fuck all. Just lmao at the social justice retards thinking we are heading towards a socialist utopia. If anything things will just become even more extreme. Even designer babies won't solve this because the upper classes will get first dips on the technology and they will never use it to aid the unwashed masses, and in fact will probably keep them intentionally inferior so that they are easier to enslave. Karl Marx was wrong. There isn't going to be any proletariat revolution because the proles are so genetically inferior that they will never be able to revolt. This is the basic problem with marxism, it doesn't take this into account. Just look at the third world where everything is utter shit and yet the braindead masses don't rebel.

THERE WILL NEVER EXIST EQUALITY. EVER.
 
Of course. Which is why if mankind is evil, why shouldn't you be?
Mankind is preprogrammed to think "there is no good and evil, there is only my greatness, and my enemies who will defy it."
With that morale, then ultimately we're no different or worse when we defy moral convention. It's only equal.

If you won't be as dirty as your enemy then you open yourself to the dirt that a moral code won't protect you against.
And ultimately, it's better that a sensible person with morals like us win than to lose because of restraint.
 
Karl Marx was wrong. There isn't going to be any proletariat revolution because the proles are so genetically inferior that they will never be able to revolt. This is the basic problem with marxism, it doesn't take this into account. Just look at the third world where everything is utter shit and yet the braindead masses don't rebel.

Oh yes, the tens and tens of revolutions in the last century were not real, it were just shows made by holograms.
 
tumblr_ox2jatkXqY1sg7a1bo1_500.jpg
 
Natural selection can´t be totally avoided, but I'm quite sure there are serious economic interests in keeping this status quo. Welfare state has been effectively hijacked to create an artificial division in the masses, pitting the unprivileged slaves versus the privileged slaves - aka less manhandled than the first "class". Moreover, the current natural selection is actually dysgenic because is utterly unbalanced. Even pig shaped femoids manage to breed with normies or premium normies. Also when using Chad genes the result could be underwhelming, if the femoid´s quality is subpar.

I don´t think that the proles are so genetically inferior, though. Even the elites are still human, for now. More than from a genetic point of view, I would see that as a control measure. But the lack of reaction is just apparent, maybe they have managed to fool femoids, but too many disgruntled males who cannot afford decent pussy are nothing to be scoffed at.
 
Oh yes, the tens and tens of revolutions in the last century were not real, it were just shows made by holograms.

All these revolutions happened as a result of external influence or because they were led by members of the genetic elite in the first place. And the overwhelming majority of revolts in history have ended in massive failure. There are virtually no examples of successful slave revolts for example.
 
Oh yes, the tens and tens of revolutions in the last century were not real, it were just shows made by holograms.
(((Revolutions)))

Bolshevik Revolution wouldn't have happened without (((Jacob Schiff))) and his Rothschild friends.
 
the current natural selection is actually dysgenic because is utterly unbalanced. Even pig shaped femoids manage to breed with normies or premium normies. Also when using Chad genes the result could be underwhelming, if the femoid´s quality is subpar.
There's nothing "natural" about foids having sex with dozens of different chads while being on birth control, then waiting until they're 35 to squeeze out autism babies with betabux soycucks.
 
As humans, we're subject to the victimhood of other humans who WILL rise up in some form of social hierarchy. Everyone has their own moral perspective, and if we perceive humanity to be inherently evil then what does that say about us?

You can disenfranchise those on top all you like, there will ALWAYS be somebody to take their place on the top.
Also, natural selection itself is inherently flawed, as whichever gender gets to choose will always have access to the opposite gender.

Even if they themselves are hideous, can get the best members of the opposite sex.
 
Just look at the third world where everything is utter shit and yet the braindead masses don't rebel.
That's not because they are sub6, that's because they're uneducated and oppressed. Us westerners have entitlements and rights that we'll never give up.
 
(((Revolutions)))

Bolshevik Revolution wouldn't have happened without (((Jacob Schiff))) and his Rothschild friends.
UUuuUuUuuuUU mUh jEwS cOnTrOl aLL tHe wOrLd
 
There's nothing "natural" about foids having sex with dozens of different chads while being on birth control, then waiting until they're 35 to squeeze out autism babies with betabux soycucks.

I should have styled that natural like this, but you´re right. There´s nothing natural. We have defeated diseases, starvation, etc...to get impaired and telegony ridden babies. Well done, elites.
 
UUuuUuUuuuUU mUh jEwS cOnTrOl aLL tHe wOrLd
Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Lev Kamenev, Grigory Zinoviev, Alexander Pavrus, Jacob Sverdlov, Gendrikh Yagoda, etc. Were all Jewish.
 
Which is why it'd be best for everything to end.
 
Natural Selection can be overcome with human genetic engineering technology like crispr. Although idk what the limitations of such technology will be and if we will be able to eventually produce high IQ, 6 feet tall, genetic superhuman, designer babies. I wrote about it natural selection in this thread.
https://incels.is/threads/interesti...-made-by-brazilian-author.91327/#post-1765478

I'm sure designer babies will be open to the public, but idk what kind of cost will it be. Supposedly it isn't that expensive.
 
Last edited:
Of course. Which is why if mankind is evil, why shouldn't you be?
Mankind is preprogrammed to think "there is no good and evil, there is only my greatness, and my enemies who will defy it."
With that morale, then ultimately we're no different or worse when we defy moral convention. It's only equal.

If you won't be as dirty as your enemy then you open yourself to the dirt that a moral code won't protect you against.
And ultimately, it's better that a sensible person with morals like us win than to lose because of restraint.
High iq.
 
If the elites truly ascend genetically they will open their hearts

Unfortunately everyone is brainwashed by the notion of IQ, lmfao fools you've been deceived, emotional quotient is where its at EQ

If your EQ is high you're not retarded and you can see the value of cooperation over competition, the value of life over vanity and superficiality

Tesla, einstein, musk,...these guys arent capitalistic pigs, if it wasnt for thomas edison electricity would be dirt cheap

because greedy pigs and elites can never develop real intelligence
Real intelligence, real human ascension entails high IQ and high EQ

If the elites where to ever ascend for real they would turn around and take care of us

Steve jobs and mark zuckerberg are a nice example of guys with high IQ and low EQ
They made some impressive feats but in the end they screwed everyone over still, apple and its retarded consumer elitism cult, making money out of people's idiocy, and facebook not giving a shit about privacy, fucking everyone over in the end
 
Unfortunately everyone is brainwashed by the notion of IQ, lmfao fools you've been deceived, emotional quotient is where its at EQ
:soy: muh high EQ. You should work in a HR department.
 
That's not because they are sub6, that's because they're uneducated and oppressed. Us westerners have entitlements and rights that we'll never give up.

:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:

Unfortunately everyone is brainwashed by the notion of IQ, lmfao fools you've been deceived, emotional quotient is where its at EQ

:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
All we can do is sit back and watch the shit show.
 
As humans, we're subject to the victimhood of other humans who WILL rise up in some form of social hierarchy. Everyone has their own moral perspective, and if we perceive humanity to be inherently evil then what does that say about us?

You can disenfranchise those on top all you like, there will ALWAYS be somebody to take their place on the top.
Also, natural selection itself is inherently flawed, as whichever gender gets to choose will always have access to the opposite gender.

Even if they themselves are hideous, can get the best members of the opposite sex.
The criteria of what gender is the "chooser" and which is the "chaser" depends on which one has more overall instability for the lesser to keep because the chooser has more sexual utility.
In a world of humanitarian helpfulness/ insulation, then women are the choosers because they're more widely wanted. Women are always more widely wanted CARNALLY for men than your average guy is to women.. But it's protection/ insulation/ economic stability/ security etc. that men must provide to keep women happy.
With that taken care of in the 21st century, then women realign their criteria to taste/ preference than security; Men have become worthless overall.
But women, in our age of ornateness/ refinement/ have always represented the kind of sleekness/ pleasantry that we have conditioned society to be. Raw brutality is a thing of the past, and if you have it you're weak/ nigger/ low value status.

We live in the age of, if you're not strong/ powerful but if you have luxury in your lineage/ background/ identity... then you will be high value.
 

Similar threads

stranger
Replies
43
Views
391
stranger
stranger
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
25
Views
854
subhumanBadger
subhumanBadger
TFDinGTA
Replies
32
Views
315
umsure
U

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top