Personally, I have two moralities - one that follows my individual preferences, and the other which I feel like accomplishes the goals of the society the best. Let's see:
1) personally, I want everyone to die to prevent any future suffering;
2) at least, I want everyone to exercise his will to enact his condition;
3) sexually, I imagine it to be a lovey-dovey monogamous thing for its own sake, unconditional love.
But societally, I understand that:
1) homo homini lupus;
2) humans naturally gravitate towards forming collectives to which they delegate their responsibility;
3) these collectives are spiders in a bottle, fighting a battle royale to the death due to zero sum limited resources;
4) sex is like murder, for domination and breeding slaves;
5) children are slaves to their parents, women to men, men to king;
6) women will cuck you and/or spit on you if you don't dominate them and offer resources;
7) the only morality is racial survival.
In this way, I don't really understand where you derive your Hitchens atheistic morality from at all. Yes, ideally, I'd like to have my lovey-dovey thing. But it's as impossible as shitting butterflies. I hate shitting. I hate eating. I hate this reality. But at least I can draw a line where it's reality and where fantasy. What you're clamouring for is fantasy which will kill any society that practices that debauchery for long enough.
Sharia law to me is strong familial bonds and a gf in reward if I fulfill my duty, certain characteristics. I could maybe try to earn money, then buy a waifu. Alternatively, I could get a job, and then my granny would offer me a gf. But with female rights in action, nothing I can ever do will yield any results because I'm autistic and can't talk.
1) personally, I want everyone to die to prevent any future suffering;
2) at least, I want everyone to exercise his will to enact his condition;
3) sexually, I imagine it to be a lovey-dovey monogamous thing for its own sake, unconditional love.
But societally, I understand that:
1) homo homini lupus;
2) humans naturally gravitate towards forming collectives to which they delegate their responsibility;
3) these collectives are spiders in a bottle, fighting a battle royale to the death due to zero sum limited resources;
4) sex is like murder, for domination and breeding slaves;
5) children are slaves to their parents, women to men, men to king;
6) women will cuck you and/or spit on you if you don't dominate them and offer resources;
7) the only morality is racial survival.
In this way, I don't really understand where you derive your Hitchens atheistic morality from at all. Yes, ideally, I'd like to have my lovey-dovey thing. But it's as impossible as shitting butterflies. I hate shitting. I hate eating. I hate this reality. But at least I can draw a line where it's reality and where fantasy. What you're clamouring for is fantasy which will kill any society that practices that debauchery for long enough.
Sharia law to me is strong familial bonds and a gf in reward if I fulfill my duty, certain characteristics. I could maybe try to earn money, then buy a waifu. Alternatively, I could get a job, and then my granny would offer me a gf. But with female rights in action, nothing I can ever do will yield any results because I'm autistic and can't talk.
