Y
yukreic
Banned
-
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2018
- Posts
- 44
in sickel cell anemia, its caused by having 2 copies of the defective genes. so why hasnt that gene be weeded out? turned out, having jsut 1 copy of that gene, plus its normie counterpart, is actually better than having 2 normie genes in terms of resistance to malaria. so that gene never got weeded out. people with 1 defective + 1 normie gene in that genome location, ended up having more offspring than those with 2. the byproduct is occasionally, TWO people with 1 defective gene breed, and there's a 25% chance of the offspring getting both normie genes, 50% chance of getting 1 defective, 25% of getting BOTH DEFECTIVE. If you get both defective you will get sickel cell anaemia and you will end up way worse than normies, because malaria might not kill you, but the anemia will.
that above example is well proven in evolutionary biology.
and i think this pricinple extends to a lot of phsycholgical conditons, including autism.
see, being totally normie is dumb. they are average and low iq, and follow social norms and easily brainwashed and manipulated.
therefore, autistic genes are prevalent. normies with just one copy of the autistic genes are smarter, more analytical, being able to see through bullshit better than normies. less NT, prone to break social norms but still understand it. These gives these normies an advantage. They're more likely to manipulate others, they understand the social norms but instead of just blindly follow them, they break it when they feel it helps them. It's like loyalty. Being seen as loyal and trustworth is good, but being blindedly loyal and fail to jump ship at the right time is not good.
the problem occurs when two such normies breed. They have a high chance of having an offspring, that inherit both copies of the autism genes, and end up autistic. The autistic offpsring would not even understand social norms and they'd break it all the time, and become just overall, weird, and end up isolated. They over-analyse things and become trapped. They're too smart for their own good.
We're the equivalent of sickel cell victims, my fellow autism/aspie cels.
that above example is well proven in evolutionary biology.
and i think this pricinple extends to a lot of phsycholgical conditons, including autism.
see, being totally normie is dumb. they are average and low iq, and follow social norms and easily brainwashed and manipulated.
therefore, autistic genes are prevalent. normies with just one copy of the autistic genes are smarter, more analytical, being able to see through bullshit better than normies. less NT, prone to break social norms but still understand it. These gives these normies an advantage. They're more likely to manipulate others, they understand the social norms but instead of just blindly follow them, they break it when they feel it helps them. It's like loyalty. Being seen as loyal and trustworth is good, but being blindedly loyal and fail to jump ship at the right time is not good.
the problem occurs when two such normies breed. They have a high chance of having an offspring, that inherit both copies of the autism genes, and end up autistic. The autistic offpsring would not even understand social norms and they'd break it all the time, and become just overall, weird, and end up isolated. They over-analyse things and become trapped. They're too smart for their own good.
We're the equivalent of sickel cell victims, my fellow autism/aspie cels.