Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

My prediction for global population collapse and the end of humanity

sexualeconomist

sexualeconomist

Admiral
★★★
Joined
Jul 13, 2024
Posts
2,774
Hey I’m back with an even darker twist on my last post. We’ve established the global population is slowing, peaking around 2060 at 9 billion, then declining fast—potentially below 400 million by 2250–2300—due to aging populations, economic collapse, deflation, and a leftward lurch into Marxism, feminism, LGBT rights, and anti-natalist gloom. But what if it doesn’t stop there? What if the decline accelerates until humanity flatlines at zero? I’ve crunched the numbers again, and it’s not as far-fetched as it sounds. Let’s dive in.

Recap: The Decline Is Already Locked In
As of March 24, 2025, we’re at 8.2 billion, growing at 0.7% per year, but that’s dropping by 0.02 percentage points annually (Our World in Data). Projections say we peak at 9–9.7 billion by 2060 (The Lancet), then decline as fertility rates crash below replacement (2.1 kids/woman) to 1.5 or lower by 2100. Developed nations like Japan (-0.5% yearly drop) and South Korea (fertility at 0.8) show what’s coming: shrinking populations only propped up by immigration, which won’t scale globally. My last post predicted a fall to 400 million by 2250–2300 with an accelerating decline rate. Now, let’s push it to zero.

The Acceleration Machine: Why It Won’t Stop
The decline doesn’t just coast—it speeds up. Here’s the engine:
  • Elderly Overload: By 2100, the dependency ratio hits 1.16 (old folks outnumber workers, per The Lancet), draining resources and leaving no slack for kids. Japan’s already losing 600k+ yearly (Reuters).
  • Economic Death Spiral: Fewer people = less demand = deflation = stagnant wages. Look at Japan’s 30-year deflation mess—now imagine it global. No one’s affording families.
  • Cultural Collapse: Marxism, feminism, LGBT rights, and anti-natalism (e.g., “kids are bad for the planet”) dominate, especially in democracies. Fertility’s already at 1.2 in China, 0.8 in South Korea—anti-kid vibes could push it to 0.5 or less.
  • Negative Feedback: Depressed societies breed despair, not babies. Add climate chaos or wars, and it’s game over.
Without immigration (impossible when everyone’s shrinking) or tech miracles (e.g., artificial wombs), there’s no brake on this train.

The Math: From 400 Million to Zero
Let’s start where we left off: 400 million in 2300, with a decline rate of -2.6% per year that keeps accelerating. I’ll assume it increases by 0.05% annually (same as before), but as the population shrinks, the absolute drop gets smaller even as the percentage grows. Here’s a rough timeline:
  • 2300: 400 million, -2.6% decline (389.6 million by 2301, losing 10.4 million/year).
  • 2350: Decline rate hits -4.1%, population ~150 million (losing ~6.2 million/year).
  • 2375: Decline rate at -5.1%, population ~70 million (losing ~3.6 million/year).
  • 2390: Decline rate at -5.6%, population ~30 million (losing ~1.7 million/year).
  • 2400: Decline rate at -6.1%, population ~10 million (losing ~0.6 million/year).
  • 2410: Decline rate at -6.6%, population drops below 1 million (losing ~66k/year).
  • 2420: Decline rate at -7.1%, population nears zero (hundreds of thousands or less).
This is exponential decay with a twist—the rate keeps climbing. By 2400, we’re at 10 million; by 2410, it’s a million or less. Hitting absolute zero (no humans) is tricky—small pockets might hang on—but functionally, humanity could be done by 2400–2420 if the trend holds. Fertility dropping to near-zero (e.g., 0.2 kids/woman) in a broken world seals it.

Reality Check: Could It Really Happen?
No population has hit zero naturally, but we’ve never seen a globalized decline like this. Japan’s losing 0.5% yearly now; scale that up with no immigration, and -5% or -7% isn’t crazy by 2400. Historical collapses (e.g., post-Roman Empire regional drops) hit 50%+ over centuries, but modern tech and culture could amplify it. If fertility falls below 0.5 globally—plausible with anti-natalism—and death rates spike from aging or chaos, zero becomes mathematically inevitable. Counterforces like AI, gene editing, or mass migration might delay it, but I’m betting on collapse.

When Does It Hit Zero?
My call: the global population could effectively reach zero between 2400 and 2420. That’s 375–395 years from now. It’s not a neat “last human dies” moment—think scattered remnants fading out. The decline rate could hit -7% or more by then, wiping out the last millions fast. Compare that to the UN’s chill “stabilize at 10 billion” vibe—this is the dark timeline.

TL;DR
Population peaks at 9 billion in 2060, crashes to 400 million by 2300, then races to zero by 2400–2420, driven by old people, broke economies, and a Marxist-feminist-anti-kid culture spiral. No stabilization, just extinction. Am I unhinged, or is this the endgame?

 
Ultimate plan is to drop human population down to 500m-1b worldwide, ~50% to be plebs, 50% live like kings, rest of work automated by robots and ai.
 
Ultimate plan is to drop human population down to 500m-1b worldwide, ~50% to be plebs, 50% live like kings, rest of work automated by robots and ai.
That plan failed now it's just anarchy and the propagation of more and more leftist ideas taken to there axiomatic extremes

Even the elites are being degeneration becoming gays trannies racemixxing
 
@SIR ETHNICCEL
 
Ultimate plan is to drop human population down to 500m-1b worldwide, ~50% to be plebs, 50% live like kings, rest of work automated by robots and ai.
Elites are gonna monopolize AI, which they have already started, and serve the rest of the population with slops. They are never gonna let the population have any agency.
 
People cannot afford kids because the whole population is a consoomer hivemind. Add in to the fact people overstaying in employment and foids being allowed in workplace, causing massive unemployments.
 
Elites are gonna monopolize AI, which they have already started, and serve the rest of the population with slops. They are never gonna let the population have any agency.
Yeah, they still need some workers to do the work which AI cant, and also to feel better about themselves by mogging the "general population" But its obvious that the elites are trying to drop down the world population fast.
 
Dunno but what i do know is the fertility rate in developed countries is below 2.1 because some women are having no children at all. But wait if many women are having NO children why is the fertility rate at 1.1 for natives and at 1.5 including the immigrant foids? Becuase the 1.1 birth rates is many women are having zero children but other woimen are having 2-5 children. Women are breeding dont be mistaken about it.
Infact the populations in Europe are simply returning to their natural sizes they always were before the industrial revolution before babies nolonger died when young because of medicine and such.

Google population of Germany 1600 or google population of UK in 1500. Things are just going back to normal.

So thats why i dunno and take everything with a pinch of salt
 
Hey I’m back with an even darker twist on my last post. We’ve established the global population is slowing, peaking around 2060 at 9 billion, then declining fast—potentially below 400 million by 2250–2300—due to aging populations, economic collapse, deflation, and a leftward lurch into Marxism, feminism, LGBT rights, and anti-natalist gloom.
Is anti-natalism getting popular with normies or is it just the usual weirdos on Reddit?
 
Yeah, they still need some workers to do the work which AI cant, and also to feel better about themselves by mogging the "general population" But its obvious that the elites are trying to drop down the world population fast.
I reckon the reason they are trying to drop population fast is because it will cause a massive incompetency crisis and over-dependence on elites. I don't for a sec believe it's to minimize consumption of resource as west with it's little population consumes far more than the rest of the world.
Older folks overstaying at their employment has already started it. It will only be expedited from here on. Gen-z and alpha are on the same level as boomer when it comes to tech, and At least boomers can fix cars and shit. Modern systems will be more unmaintainable. Of course, they targeted foids by packaging not having kids as empowering.
 
Hey I’m back with an even darker twist on my last post. We’ve established the global population is slowing, peaking around 2060 at 9 billion, then declining fast—potentially below 400 million by 2250–2300—due to aging populations, economic collapse, deflation, and a leftward lurch into Marxism, feminism, LGBT rights, and anti-natalist gloom. But what if it doesn’t stop there? What if the decline accelerates until humanity flatlines at zero? I’ve crunched the numbers again, and it’s not as far-fetched as it sounds. Let’s dive in.

Recap: The Decline Is Already Locked In
As of March 24, 2025, we’re at 8.2 billion, growing at 0.7% per year, but that’s dropping by 0.02 percentage points annually (Our World in Data). Projections say we peak at 9–9.7 billion by 2060 (The Lancet), then decline as fertility rates crash below replacement (2.1 kids/woman) to 1.5 or lower by 2100. Developed nations like Japan (-0.5% yearly drop) and South Korea (fertility at 0.8) show what’s coming: shrinking populations only propped up by immigration, which won’t scale globally. My last post predicted a fall to 400 million by 2250–2300 with an accelerating decline rate. Now, let’s push it to zero.

The Acceleration Machine: Why It Won’t Stop
The decline doesn’t just coast—it speeds up. Here’s the engine:
  • Elderly Overload: By 2100, the dependency ratio hits 1.16 (old folks outnumber workers, per The Lancet), draining resources and leaving no slack for kids. Japan’s already losing 600k+ yearly (Reuters).
  • Economic Death Spiral: Fewer people = less demand = deflation = stagnant wages. Look at Japan’s 30-year deflation mess—now imagine it global. No one’s affording families.
  • Cultural Collapse: Marxism, feminism, LGBT rights, and anti-natalism (e.g., “kids are bad for the planet”) dominate, especially in democracies. Fertility’s already at 1.2 in China, 0.8 in South Korea—anti-kid vibes could push it to 0.5 or less.
  • Negative Feedback: Depressed societies breed despair, not babies. Add climate chaos or wars, and it’s game over.
Without immigration (impossible when everyone’s shrinking) or tech miracles (e.g., artificial wombs), there’s no brake on this train.

The Math: From 400 Million to Zero
Let’s start where we left off: 400 million in 2300, with a decline rate of -2.6% per year that keeps accelerating. I’ll assume it increases by 0.05% annually (same as before), but as the population shrinks, the absolute drop gets smaller even as the percentage grows. Here’s a rough timeline:
  • 2300: 400 million, -2.6% decline (389.6 million by 2301, losing 10.4 million/year).
  • 2350: Decline rate hits -4.1%, population ~150 million (losing ~6.2 million/year).
  • 2375: Decline rate at -5.1%, population ~70 million (losing ~3.6 million/year).
  • 2390: Decline rate at -5.6%, population ~30 million (losing ~1.7 million/year).
  • 2400: Decline rate at -6.1%, population ~10 million (losing ~0.6 million/year).
  • 2410: Decline rate at -6.6%, population drops below 1 million (losing ~66k/year).
  • 2420: Decline rate at -7.1%, population nears zero (hundreds of thousands or less).
This is exponential decay with a twist—the rate keeps climbing. By 2400, we’re at 10 million; by 2410, it’s a million or less. Hitting absolute zero (no humans) is tricky—small pockets might hang on—but functionally, humanity could be done by 2400–2420 if the trend holds. Fertility dropping to near-zero (e.g., 0.2 kids/woman) in a broken world seals it.

Reality Check: Could It Really Happen?
No population has hit zero naturally, but we’ve never seen a globalized decline like this. Japan’s losing 0.5% yearly now; scale that up with no immigration, and -5% or -7% isn’t crazy by 2400. Historical collapses (e.g., post-Roman Empire regional drops) hit 50%+ over centuries, but modern tech and culture could amplify it. If fertility falls below 0.5 globally—plausible with anti-natalism—and death rates spike from aging or chaos, zero becomes mathematically inevitable. Counterforces like AI, gene editing, or mass migration might delay it, but I’m betting on collapse.

When Does It Hit Zero?
My call: the global population could effectively reach zero between 2400 and 2420. That’s 375–395 years from now. It’s not a neat “last human dies” moment—think scattered remnants fading out. The decline rate could hit -7% or more by then, wiping out the last millions fast. Compare that to the UN’s chill “stabilize at 10 billion” vibe—this is the dark timeline.

TL;DR
Population peaks at 9 billion in 2060, crashes to 400 million by 2300, then races to zero by 2400–2420, driven by old people, broke economies, and a Marxist-feminist-anti-kid culture spiral. No stabilization, just extinction. Am I unhinged, or is this the endgame?

They already had this planned (global population below 500 mill) on the GA Guidstones way back in 1980. The weird thing is I had never heard of the GA Guidstones before like 2017, and I live in Burgerland not too far from them lol.
611b8682 9e78 48bb 8b33 253017699563a5a2abce86f2e59620 8 27 2007 23
 
I reckon the reason they are trying to drop population fast is because it will cause a massive incompetency crisis and over-dependence on elites. I don't for a sec believe it's to minimize consumption of resource as west with it's little population consumes far more than the rest of the world.
Older folks overstaying at their employment has already started it. It will only be expedited from here on. Gen-z and alpha are on the same level as boomer when it comes to tech, and At least boomers can fix cars and shit. Modern systems will be more unmaintainable. Of course, they targeted foids by packaging not having kids as empowering.
Yeah, true.

Modern slaves will be high iq capable people who can keep the world running. Guys like Elon Musk dont know 10% of what they pretend to, its the nameless high iq guys that work for him.
 
Is anti-natalism getting popular with normies or is it just the usual weirdos on Reddit?
Anti natalism is the axiomatic conclusion of liberalism/humanism
 
Is anti-natalism getting popular with normies or is it just the usual weirdos on Reddit?
Yeah, it's a pretty popular consensus but it's not anti-natalism per se, just a part of it. Everyone's being encouraged to seek comfort and avoid responsibilities as much as possible. Most people don't even cook their own food. So, when normies say they can't afford kids, what they mean is they don't wanna have that responsibility since people used to have kids in much harsher conditions before modernity.
 
@Castizo O' Toole
 
I think a chink in the armor with this theory is that Marxist ideas and anti-natalism haven't spread to the third world. Developed countries will certainly experience population decline but mud hut dwelling third worlders continue to breed like rabbits. Its possible that at some point developed nations will just stop sending aid to Africa, but even if this does happen they will continue to breed albeit in smaller numbers.

In my eyes it's more likely that nigger world comes to pass and we're plunged into another dark age. Developed nations will be the only ones reeling from population decline.
 
Hey I’m back with an even darker twist on my last post. We’ve established the global population is slowing, peaking around 2060 at 9 billion, then declining fast—potentially below 400 million by 2250–2300—due to aging populations, economic collapse, deflation, and a leftward lurch into Marxism, feminism, LGBT rights, and anti-natalist gloom. But what if it doesn’t stop there? What if the decline accelerates until humanity flatlines at zero? I’ve crunched the numbers again, and it’s not as far-fetched as it sounds. Let’s dive in.

Recap: The Decline Is Already Locked In
As of March 24, 2025, we’re at 8.2 billion, growing at 0.7% per year, but that’s dropping by 0.02 percentage points annually (Our World in Data). Projections say we peak at 9–9.7 billion by 2060 (The Lancet), then decline as fertility rates crash below replacement (2.1 kids/woman) to 1.5 or lower by 2100. Developed nations like Japan (-0.5% yearly drop) and South Korea (fertility at 0.8) show what’s coming: shrinking populations only propped up by immigration, which won’t scale globally. My last post predicted a fall to 400 million by 2250–2300 with an accelerating decline rate. Now, let’s push it to zero.

The Acceleration Machine: Why It Won’t Stop
The decline doesn’t just coast—it speeds up. Here’s the engine:
  • Elderly Overload: By 2100, the dependency ratio hits 1.16 (old folks outnumber workers, per The Lancet), draining resources and leaving no slack for kids. Japan’s already losing 600k+ yearly (Reuters).
  • Economic Death Spiral: Fewer people = less demand = deflation = stagnant wages. Look at Japan’s 30-year deflation mess—now imagine it global. No one’s affording families.
  • Cultural Collapse: Marxism, feminism, LGBT rights, and anti-natalism (e.g., “kids are bad for the planet”) dominate, especially in democracies. Fertility’s already at 1.2 in China, 0.8 in South Korea—anti-kid vibes could push it to 0.5 or less.
  • Negative Feedback: Depressed societies breed despair, not babies. Add climate chaos or wars, and it’s game over.
Without immigration (impossible when everyone’s shrinking) or tech miracles (e.g., artificial wombs), there’s no brake on this train.

The Math: From 400 Million to Zero
Let’s start where we left off: 400 million in 2300, with a decline rate of -2.6% per year that keeps accelerating. I’ll assume it increases by 0.05% annually (same as before), but as the population shrinks, the absolute drop gets smaller even as the percentage grows. Here’s a rough timeline:
  • 2300: 400 million, -2.6% decline (389.6 million by 2301, losing 10.4 million/year).
  • 2350: Decline rate hits -4.1%, population ~150 million (losing ~6.2 million/year).
  • 2375: Decline rate at -5.1%, population ~70 million (losing ~3.6 million/year).
  • 2390: Decline rate at -5.6%, population ~30 million (losing ~1.7 million/year).
  • 2400: Decline rate at -6.1%, population ~10 million (losing ~0.6 million/year).
  • 2410: Decline rate at -6.6%, population drops below 1 million (losing ~66k/year).
  • 2420: Decline rate at -7.1%, population nears zero (hundreds of thousands or less).
This is exponential decay with a twist—the rate keeps climbing. By 2400, we’re at 10 million; by 2410, it’s a million or less. Hitting absolute zero (no humans) is tricky—small pockets might hang on—but functionally, humanity could be done by 2400–2420 if the trend holds. Fertility dropping to near-zero (e.g., 0.2 kids/woman) in a broken world seals it.

Reality Check: Could It Really Happen?
No population has hit zero naturally, but we’ve never seen a globalized decline like this. Japan’s losing 0.5% yearly now; scale that up with no immigration, and -5% or -7% isn’t crazy by 2400. Historical collapses (e.g., post-Roman Empire regional drops) hit 50%+ over centuries, but modern tech and culture could amplify it. If fertility falls below 0.5 globally—plausible with anti-natalism—and death rates spike from aging or chaos, zero becomes mathematically inevitable. Counterforces like AI, gene editing, or mass migration might delay it, but I’m betting on collapse.

When Does It Hit Zero?
My call: the global population could effectively reach zero between 2400 and 2420. That’s 375–395 years from now. It’s not a neat “last human dies” moment—think scattered remnants fading out. The decline rate could hit -7% or more by then, wiping out the last millions fast. Compare that to the UN’s chill “stabilize at 10 billion” vibe—this is the dark timeline.

TL;DR
Population peaks at 9 billion in 2060, crashes to 400 million by 2300, then races to zero by 2400–2420, driven by old people, broke economies, and a Marxist-feminist-anti-kid culture spiral. No stabilization, just extinction. Am I unhinged, or is this the endgame?

Low birth rate is natural this low birth rate is goverment fear mongering humanity wont fall apart beucase of it that's byond stupid just boomer will suffer retirement money being low
 
Low birth rate is natural this low birth rate is goverment fear mongering humanity wont fall apart beucase of it that's byond stupid just boomer will suffer retirement money being low
No low birth rates are not natural they never been natural since all of human existence

Did you oulll thag form yout ass
 
The
No low birth rates are not natural they never been natural since all of human existence

Did you oulll thag form yout ass
They are natural the only thing that will suffer are old people
 
The
They are natural the only thing that will suffer are old people
What are you even talking about


Shall I post birth per person since the Roman periods?
 

Similar threads

icastdream
Replies
18
Views
630
LOLI BREEDING
LOLI BREEDING
Justanotherbloke
Replies
10
Views
901
AntoCel
AntoCel
Shaktiman
Replies
19
Views
1K
Based NaziCel
Based NaziCel
Castizo O' Toole
Replies
7
Views
1K
Castizo O' Toole
Castizo O' Toole

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top