Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Mussolini or Hitler

AutistSupremacist

AutistSupremacist

Teen love = life
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2022
Posts
9,765
1735137300055


1735137328244


Who is better? I prefer Mussolini tbh I find him more human, like his gestures and posturing, Classical Fascism is far better than Hitlerite National Socialism.
 
It's the same worldview
Not at all. Fascism was always concerned with the idea of the nation above all, which went beyond race, ethnicity, religion etc. National socialism was entirely racial, believing that one race superior and was supposed to rule the others.
 
Hitler but Mussolini was also based AF

The Italians could not fight for shit in WW2 tho
 
I'd say Stalin was king of the dictators but a lot is less what someone did but what they could have done also.There is really nothing unique ,any sociopath in a prison somewhere could be a genocidal third world dictator if someone gave them a country!
 
It's the same worldview
Italian Fascism
>more aligned with Christianity, Catholicism specifically
>not really as interested in racialism
>antisemitism only really became a thing in the 40s due to German pressure
>surprisingly to many, not really all that centered on a single leader, with the Council of Fascism holding significant power and even deposing Mussolini at one point

German Nazism
>less aligned with Christianity, with certain factions outright being antagonistic and flirting with neopaganism and occult esotericism
>extremely interested in racialism
>antisemitism is a key component
>based entirely on the führerprinzip
 
Not at all. Fascism was always concerned with the idea of the nation above all, which went beyond race, ethnicity, religion etc. National socialism was entirely racial, believing that one race superior and was supposed to rule the others.
The nation is RACE
 
Italian Fascism
>more aligned with Christianity, Catholicism specifically
>not really as interested in racialism
>antisemitism only really became a thing in the 40s due to German pressure
>surprisingly to many, not really all that centered on a single leader, with the Council of Fascism holding significant power and even deposing Mussolini at one point

German Nazism
>less aligned with Christianity, with certain factions outright being antagonistic and flirting with neopaganism and occult esotericism
>extremely interested in racialism
>antisemitism is a key component
>based entirely on the führerprinzip
Nope, it's the same revolutionary worldview. Read the Doctrine of Fascism by Benito Mussolini, it's right there on page one.
 
Nope, it's the same revolutionary worldview. Read the Doctrine of Fascism by Benito Mussolini, it's right there on page one.
I just listed a series of core ideals where their worldviews differ. Regardless, most fringe ideologies share a revolutionary worldview, but that's about where similarities begin and end. If you think the Catholic Fascists and the esotericist Nazis share the same worldview besides the most basic concepts, you're retarded. Remember that Italy and Mussolini were initially extremely skeptical of Germany and Hitler, sometimes even opposing them, like in the Anschluss.
 
The nation is RACE
What if the nation is comprised of numerous races? In an empire like Italy, what would you consider the people of Libya, Italian Somaliland, Abyssinia and Eritrea?
 
hitler obviously. mussolini was way too weak beyond italy. hitler went from homeless to fuhrer , turned germany into a powerhouse , and came very to close to preventing jewish takeover of the world and secure europe's future for 1000 years
 
Both were based as fuck
 
Although I like the concept of nation above all, I realize that's just a wet dream

Humans will always be loyal to race first

Therefore, realistically, Hitler
 
What if the nation is comprised of numerous races? In an empire like Italy, what would you consider the people of Libya, Italian Somaliland, Abyssinia and Eritrea?
Then it's not a nation, it is an empire.

Nation comes from the latin word Natio meaning race
 
neither but if I had to pick hitler because atleast he tried to stop israel and jewish capitalism from forming. mussolini was just a boring nationalist
 
Mussolini is very much the lesser of them in every way.

But on the plus side, Mussolini's dream was to restore Rome's african empire by conquering and plundering Africans.
 
Hitler is unequivocal. Mussolini was a Marxist socialist for a long time, which is why I never understood his. Secondly, he did not create a strong army, which is why he lost to Greece, while the Reich held out for 4 years against three empires: the Soviet, British, and American. The Third Reich brought the whole of Europe to its knees and made it so that only conquered countries, allies or neutrals (Sweden, Portugal, Switzerland) remained in Europe. Hitler created the peak of the German nation when it was closest to dominating the whole of Europe. The German people, from a bunch of principalities, kingdoms, and duchies that acted as dimensional coins in the European wars of the past, and Germany itself was a battlefield of foreign powers, became the ruler of the whole of Europe.
 
Last edited:
Every nation has its maximum peak of development when it is closest to domination.: The French had this peak during the time of Napoleon Bonaparte, the British under Queen Victoria, and the Germans under Adolf Hitler.
 
Mussolini was a joke although he was based af
Mussolini himself was simping hard whenever he met hitler
 
1735165230616
Mussolini mogged, Hitler was a fake ftm troon and also kike with plan to give entire world to international jewerly. Shame that Mussolini was leading such shitty country with no resources and no plan for future. He was doomed like Japan and Germany from the start. USA was playing on a cheat codes since the beginning.
 
I like both, but I believe Hitler was a more effective ruler and less compromising than Mussolini
 
Mussolini was a manlet slayer
 
Didn't Mussolini not place much value on ethnicity? So he may have hypothetically not protected native Italians enough.

That being said he was probably patriotic enough to have valued this on some crucial level.
 
hitler obviously. mussolini was way too weak beyond italy. hitler went from homeless to fuhrer , turned germany into a powerhouse , and came very to close to preventing jewish takeover of the world and secure europe's future for 1000 years
i don't think Germany would have lasted as he envisioned it for long after he died.
 
2 retarded ideologies, nazism even more retarded since its economy entirely relied on pillaging to not be drowning in debt.

Also imagine using Chad athlethes photos for Aryan propaganda when half of the party higher ups looks like incels, who only got laid/ married because women didnt allowed to have financial independence.
 
i don't think Germany would have lasted as he envisioned it for long after he died.
for sure things would change once he died , but it would've been the end of the jewish question. a world without mass immigration , feminism , lgbt , debt slavery , 9/11 etc.
 
2 retarded ideologies, nazism even more retarded since its economy entirely relied on pillaging to not be drowning in debt.

Also imagine using Chad athlethes photos for Aryan propaganda when half of the party higher ups looks like incels, who only got laid/ married because women didnt allowed to have financial independence.
Today those officers would be making blackpill memes about Chad just like in those times. Some things never change.
 
Hitler is better, any party that does not have necessary anti semitism is bound to be subverted and controlled by Jews.
 
Hitler, he destroyed the Jewish control over Germany and was carrying the axis powers in ww2
 
hitler

mussolini got cucked by victor emmanual 2
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top