Soy morals are a meme

[jerrycan dan]

How tf am I supposed to justify anything objectively.
Nature has no "should" or "deserves", only things that happen or don't happen. How am I in a position to dictate something that doesn't even exist?

Cucktears niggas trying to tell us rape is bad, why? Why are women equal to men? I'm not saying anything illegal is a good thing but it isn't a bad thing either, who tf are you to say something is good or bad. lmao imagine being that full of yourself, must take a lot of energy to devote all your time thinking about whether something is right or wrong according to a moral compass you mostly sponged off the world around you but pretend is your own.

What purpose do morals serve in 2018 anno domini?

 

[jerrycan dan]

spook

tbhtbhtbhtbhtbh ngl
but most of the nigees who call a spook a spook will flip their shit once you say something they think is bad actually isn't, even though the fact they care so much contradicts what they say about spooks

 

[FukkenLoser]

High IQ, the only principle we can follow is LDAR

 

[Mainländer]

According to truthism.com, the objective of all human beings is not needing to have any morals.

"The ambitious human beings who scurry around in Earth's secret societies try their best to overcome the morality barrier. That is, their ultimate goal in life is to become powerful enough so that they will no longer need to have any morals (as is the goal of pretty much every human being on Earth, whether they want to admit it or not)."

"In essence, all of this talk about the mysterious and paranoid-sounding "suppression of the truth" simply boils down to the issue of morality. Human beings fail to realize that morality is not needed for those in power. Only the weak masses need morality, because they are not in complete control of their own destinies, and thus can be punished for any of their unsavory actions. So, when it comes to the matter of dispensing the truth, the ruling elite elect not to tell the masses the real truth about reality because they have absolutely no reason, motivation, or obligation to do so.

If one takes a step back and looks at the general attitude of Earth's authority figures, they will see that these authority figures do not exude the truth. Rather, when it comes to such tasks as disclosing information, these authority figures have an aura of shadiness. Instead of divulging all of the information that they know (such as Truthism.com does), they divulge as little information as possible.

So, getting back to the matter of the ruling elite dispensing the truth to the masses, a great analogy for this would be that of a lion nonchalantly swatting away a fly with its tail: The ruling elite will invent any bogus (yet still within reason) religion or scientific theory just to keep the masses from questioning reality. However, more than just temporarily quelling the masses, these bogus belief systems are actually able to control the masses because people foolishly end up believing in them and taking them to heart. So, in other words, instead of people interpreting a bogus belief system as simply being a possible theory or possible explanation of reality, people totally succumb to (that is, adopt) the bogus belief system because not only is the belief system within reason, but it also came from a very powerful authority figure.

The ruling elite are not anchored down by morality. They set the rules, invent the religions, invent the gods, invent the scientific theories, and do as they please. On the other hand, the masses are, by necessity, slaves to morality: If the common man does not behave properly, then, via the ruling elite's rules, he may be punished.

The logic of a common man is not the same as that of a man in power, because the common man's logic is infected with morality."

 

[Deleted member 12355]

yes bro. jfl if you aren't using every possible mean to the fullest of your advantage on the basis of moral qualms. The world has fucked us enough already, we don't have to enslave ourselves even further with so called "morality". In reality, power prevails. Of course, everyone subconsciously knows and understands this, but this insight of human nature is kept concealed under a thin layer of so called "civility". What "civility" actually entails in practice is the complete surrender to the (((forces))) that oppress us. As soon as thinking man realizes this and attempt to use means of equally rotten character that society is using to subjegate him against society itself, to put the power balance back to normal, he's "immoral" and need to be put away. It truly is a remarkable brave new world.

 

[iKillCucks]

Morals are for cucks and sjw faggots. JFL if you dont do Whatever to survive and don't fuck the world and society over

 

[Insomniac]

Man should not pretend to be above nature. It is madness. We are apart of nature.

 

[Incellectual]

Man should not pretend to be above nature. It is madness. We are apart of nature.

 

[Insomniac]

“Man must never fall into the insanity of believing that he has risen to be lord and master over Nature -- which is so easily induced by the conceit of half-education -- but must understand the fundamental necessity of Nature's rule, and realize how much of his existence is subject to these laws of combat and upward struggle. Then he will sense that in a universe where planets revolve around suns, and moons turn around planets, where force alone forever masters weakness, compelling it to be its obedient servant or else crushing it, there can be no special laws for Man. For him, too, the eternal principles of this ultimate wisdom hold sway. He can try to grasp them, but escape them never.”
- Adolf Hitler

 

[quinn24]

morals don't even exist as a scientific concept but as emotions. naturally, i have morals but i won't let them be decided on by society or the government

 

[Deleted member 14577]

Morals are cope.