Modern Humanity and Its Inevitable Collapse: Part 6 Intellectualism, debates and politics are useless.

[Secretagent007]

6- Intellectualism, debates and politics are useless.
All that we mention are generic forms of things that, deep down, are faces of the same coin, of the same essence, in which, it does not match the natural laws. Let's start with intellectualism. When we speak of intellectualism, we are not talking about knowledge linked to the way of life, which is more than necessary for existence on earth, but rather, studies carried out on the conceptions born of the will of the individual or society. it goes without saying that all the literature, lectures and production connected with this aspect is unnecessary and useless. about politics, it is important to point out that natural laws, however much they want to be treated in a political way, cannot be done, mainly because politics involves negotiation and imposition, which natural laws do not need to do, since they are organic and inherent . all political ideologies in the end are actually limited ways of seeing the world, and in essence, they are the same thing, even if in form they may be different. the focus of one's life must be natural laws. and finally, the debates. it goes without saying that the enormous changes throughout history have not come about through debate but through imposition. it is, however, funny to observe that civilization itself makes it clear that debates are useless, as it never really took advantage of them as a basis for its support. ideas actually represent means of transmitting feelings that will only be activated in those who have them. this means that people's interest in the debate has never really been the truth, but what for them is the truth.

 

[Nightwalker_98]

Debates are soy Males who talk too much are fags

 

[Secretagent007]

Debates are soy Males who talk too much are fags

I don't like to use these terms, but the essence of what you said is correct. it is unnecessary to try to change people's behavior. what you have to do is either isolate yourself or exterminate.

 

[Secretagent007]

There is no "limitless" perspective, and if there were it certainly wouldn't be the absence of perspective. The individual is bound to his subject, there is no possibility of "glimpsing beyond oneself." Ideologies are things that distinguish people from one another.

"Intellectualism," as you call it, does have a purpose: to provide awareness (joy [aesthetics]) and understanding (suffering [ethics]) to the life of the individual. Though, my definition of the intellect is influenced by Arthur Schopenhauer's, your definition seems to be more arbitrary.

While I agree that politics can be mediocre and remains largely theoretical, we shall always have a need for it; this is coming from an anarcho-liberal.

The only collapse of modern humanity will occur when we transcend what is presently considered "modern."

and even? it's comical to observe that the first thing you do is deny instead of investigating the question.

 

[Secretagent007]

well, you should read all the articles, and then you would see that debating is useless.