Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Modern human reproductive pattern doesn't make biological sense

Jockcel

Jockcel

go AB
-
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Posts
10,532
Many incels cope by thinking them not passing on their genes to the next generation will somehow benefit the future generations just like in the animal kingdom where the unfit get weeded out. This is all good and well, but you also have to take into account the fact that in the animal kingdom females also have to compete to reproduce and the fittest ones get to do so thus slowly improving the species genetics.

The human situation used to be like this until civilization where ugly males and females finally got to reproduce. This may have been bad for the overall genetic development of humanity but it was fair and everybody got laid so whatever.

Then polygamy, feminism and degeneracy came about in the 1960s, but ugly well-off males could still run betabux game. Then the final nail in the coffin for the ugly male: female financial independence in the 2000s.

This left ugly men to rot while ugly females still get laid and reproduce, spreading DNA of bad quality to the next generation. This situation is neither fair nor beneficial to the species and only serves fenales' shallow sexual desires. It won't make any difference if you reproduce as an ugly male or not because billions of ugly females will anyway.
 
Last edited:
BlackPillUNC

BlackPillUNC

Chapel Hell
★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Posts
1,215
What sense doesn't it make?

Women seek out the most fit mates, and men seek out any mate they can get. This is how humans are designed.
 
Jockcel

Jockcel

go AB
-
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Posts
10,532
What sense doesn't it make?

Women seek out the most fit mates, and men seek out any mate they can get. This is how humans are designed.
Men are supposed to only reproduce with good looking females, that's why you have those preferences.
 
Weightcel

Weightcel

Captain
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
1,885
What sense doesn't it make?

Women seek out the most fit mates, and men seek out any mate they can get. This is how humans are designed.

Unfit females still get to produce...
 
blackcel

blackcel

BBC
-
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Posts
4,930
Animal kingdom females typically don't compete. They typically just let the resident Chad fuck them whenever he wants. When they try to deny a male he will just rape her.

The bad genes filter is a male only filter. A female's genes are far more likely to get weeded out because she died before she reached reproductive age.

The difference with humans is that in other animal societies the males basically get to choose who gets to mate. They fight each other and the victor is the one who gets them sexy ladies. It is supposed to be similar with humans (instead of fighting we go through the convoluted mess that is society), but for some stupid women the western world decided that it is best to let women choose who gets to mate. This strategy leads to men only being needed for sex and becoming prettyboys. I am perfectly okay with this but men are still expected to do literally fucking everything in society while still be the prettyboy sperm donor. That shit just aint compatible.
 
Last edited:
BlackPillUNC

BlackPillUNC

Chapel Hell
★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Posts
1,215
Unfit females still get to produce...

I don't think this is abnormal. Isn't that why male peacocks have beautiful feathers and females look like shit?
 
Robo Sapien

Robo Sapien

Transcendent
★★
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Posts
1,614
Females don't compete. Selection is purely on the male end. Mating used to actually be worse until civilization. Then more equatable distributions of sex occurred until recently.
 
Jockcel

Jockcel

go AB
-
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Posts
10,532
Either way, we are screwed.
 
TrueAlphaMale

TrueAlphaMale

Crestfallen
-
Joined
Jun 20, 2018
Posts
1,416
Male lookism is a produt of feminism along with socila bullshit. 100 years ago, all you nhad to do was approach a girl to get laid. Nowdays, you have to be gl, socially integrated, meet her through common friends and shit like that.
 
G

GeneticDysfunction

Mythic
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
4,987
Who cares we are still subhuman trash
 
C

CaptainCuck

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Posts
1,525
Humans haven't yet evolved past hunter-gatherer days in terms of mate selection since agricultural society (where betabux first became a thing) has only existed for only a few thousand years. This is miniscule in comparison to how long homosapiens have been around (roughly 200,000 years) which explains why we haven't yet fully adapted to modern society.

We are kind of in a transitionary state right now where females adopt a dual-mating strategy of Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks. This way she can get a child from the biggest strongest male as instructed by her primitive biology, while getting a rich betacuck to help her raise it, usually giving him a subhuman offspring of his own in return.

If civilisation becomes advanced enough for a long enough period of time (eg thousands of years), I think female tastes in men will evolve to favour betabux only as society will by then have long since discarded the need for physical strength due to automation.
 
Cleftcel

Cleftcel

genetic determinist
★★
Joined
Mar 4, 2018
Posts
3,085
dysgenic breeding ftw
 
Zyros

Zyros

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
3,358
Male lookism is a produt of feminism along with socila bullshit. 100 years ago, all you nhad to do was approach a girl to get laid. Nowdays, you have to be gl, socially integrated, meet her through common friends and shit like that.

Lookism is a BIOLOGICAL instinct. It has nothing to do with society.
 
D

Deleted member 2119

Banned
-
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Posts
15,016
I agree It won'f solve any issues
 
C

Col.Carb

Greycel
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Posts
39
It's still better than ugly people fucking ugly people, right? Because half the DNA comes from someone superior, and if that continues, improved species fitness generation to generation. I don't think you've thought this through?
 
Deleted member 1042

Deleted member 1042

-
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Posts
5,805
Because nature isn’t perfect or even efficient. It operates on “good enough.”
 
DeepSea

DeepSea

Banned
-
Joined
Jun 29, 2018
Posts
428
Because half the DNA comes from someone superior, and if that continues, improved species fitness generation to generation. I don't think you've thought this through?

Women prefer good looking men but good looking does not necessarily mean genetically superior. For example, tall people have shorter life expectancies than short people and are at increased risk of cancer and other diseases, but women still prefer tall men because in the ancestral environment that shaped human evolution, such men were more likely to be superior hunters and warriors.
 
Last edited:
Mahlo

Mahlo

Lost time is never found again.
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
1,986
Most species go extinct. That will tell you the effectiveness of natural selection
 
VirginWithStache

VirginWithStache

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Posts
228
Working, and let alone fasting for the good of society is cuck. This what you're saying about, OP, is just incels' coping.
Strong people are egoists.
 

Similar threads

Indracel
Replies
9
Views
471
NorthernWind
NorthernWind
svgmn1
Replies
12
Views
766
Govid_Dorious
Govid_Dorious
Stoopiding1
Replies
9
Views
562
HappyDaysOrBad
HappyDaysOrBad

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top