Microaggressions and inceldom

[Simulacrasimulation]

I dont understand this introduction especially by the BLM community, regarding microaggressions (eg passive aggression, indirect actions to undermine a group, negative facial expressions etc.

Their emphasis of this is on a complete retard level, as if we are playing a game of micro aggression bingo INCELS have won every fucking year since the sexual revolution of the 1960's in the west, especially white women are fucking qwueeens of microaggression towards low value men, literally their whole existence is microaggression towards low SMV men.

It makes no objective sense, if you open up the can of worms of microaggression and its regulation, Pandoras box is open and high value SMV people eg CHAD AND WHITE WOMEN AND ACTUALLY ANY WOMEN cannot perpetrate this behaviour towards low SMV men, which is their whole angle every single day.

They are regulating the main weapon they have of subjugating low value men, the main stick they beat us with, if written into law the only way incels could not use this, is if they specifically stipulate in situations of racial conflict or similar, which is itself racist as it negates microaggression between people of the same race which is absurd.

 

[Gymcelled]

Ironically low smv males are the ones who suffer from microaggression and have negative experiences every time they step out of their house, even when they're simply trying to mind their own business.

 

[polar inertia]

Everything.

"It's unfair that people do this to us, we should be the only ones allowed to do it because we are getting rEpResSeD."