Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Men wear their IQ on their face

superighteous

superighteous

Certified Retard
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
3,478
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bigthi...ave-a-biological-advantage-on-dating-apps.amp

“In 2014, Czech scientist Karel Kleisner conducted a study in which participants viewed photographs of 40 male and 40 female subjects and rated their intelligence. Kleisner sought to discover if there was a relationship between perceived and measured intelligence. He also investigated whether there is an intelligent ‘look.’ In other words, are specific facial traits associated with attributed and actual intelligence?”

D40F8615 9E6C 4DEA 88C9 58D105C64F92


“Yes, smarter people look more intelligent. But not all people - just men. Kleisner discovered that “both men and women were able to accurately evaluate the intelligence of men by viewing facial photographs.” But strangely, “no relationship between perceived intelligence and IQ was found for women.””


“Why would this be? The study suggests that it may be beneficial for men to signal intelligence honestly. Kleisner speculates that such signalling might play well with females' "mixed mating strategy." Sometimes explained in terms of women’s alternating preference for so-called 'cads' and ‘dads,’ MMS refers to the theory that:

"Women prefer dominant men as extra-pair sexual partners while at the same time they seek men who are more willing to invest in their offspring as long-term or social partners.

It is known that while in the fertile phase of cycle and probably in search of good genes, women prefer creative intelligence to wealth especially in short-term mating.

On the other hand, a woman seeking a long term relationship could prefer a less intelligent but honest man, who compensates by long term provisioning, protection and a greater investment in childrearing."”
 
Shit, I look like the far left guy.
 
I knew Im low Iq
 
This makes me want to LDAR. Being perceived as ugly- okay I could deal with that. Being perceived as a dumb fuck- NO. Trying to have a social life is pointless since I am both ugly and unintelligent looking.
 
Lmao, I look most like the guy on the right. IQ-mogging you all the way to grave, boyos.
 
When I took an IQ test when I was in Highschool a few years back I got 154 or 156, can't remember the exact number. Pic is me. Do I look it?
View attachment 25842
Big forehead, eyes relatively wide apart: typical looks of intelligent people. I guess the more masculine a face looks, the less intelligent the person is perceived.
 
So long midface=highIQ
 
Downturned lips and aggressive hunter eyebrows are the difference.

In other words, the more masculine and dominating you look the lower perceived intelligence you have.

That is why it is absolutely godly to be masculine, dominating, and high-intelligence.

If I ever made the ultimate slayer in the laboratory, he would have these criteria all maxed at 100%:

- Masculinity.
- Domination.
- Prettiness.
- IQ (Intelligence)
- Psychopathy.


We already know the formula for good looks is to look as masculine as possible, while retaining as much prettiness as possible.

We already know that IQ by itself is not good. That is why you throw in psychopathy. IQ + Psychopathy = game over for anyone and everyone.
 
Last edited:
We already know that IQ by itself is not good. That is why you throw in psychopathy. IQ + Psychopathy = game over for anyone and everyone.

High IQ post.
 
A lot of math and science geniuses are ugly though. Hence, I'd posit that any link between looks and intelligence is substantially weakened past a certain IQ threshold.

As far is this study goes, it's cope for the men who conducted it. None of those faces are gonna get pussies wet or make a clitoris hard.
 
Science still struggling to figure out something that was known to everybody through out history.

Men are born to serve different functions, and there's a hierarchy which has thinking people on top, and action oriented people as second, with everybody else below those two (just look at what society lauds the most: heroes, and geniuses). In India, those differences were codified into castes, and whether you think that system was stupid or not, it is a fact that caste is a natural occurrence among human beings and that people will be born to serve different functions but not others whether one likes it or not, which means individualism is an absurdity because human beings need each other.

But there is one group where this rule doesn't apply, and that is females.

Now we all know how the IQ distribution between men and women is radically different at both extremities. There are far more men than women at both the lowest and highest ranges of IQ, and that actually reflects the differences in function i just explained. Men of action, so called Kshatriya, as well as peasants, the Shudra, do not require an high IQ, since their intellectual faculties are designed to deal with the realm of "concrete" things, whether for working or fighting. Their function is to make "things happen" in the external world. On the higher end of the IQ distribution, you'll have the Brahmins and Vaishyas, the thinkers and crafters/money people, whose domain is that of thought, either in terms of pure intellectuality or practical intellectuality.

Because women are not subjected to the rules of caste (except in a very superficial way. Some women may have a "warrior" like disposition because they are intended to be the companions of warriors but what they do not have is the same intelligence warriors have. Same goes for all other castes), they all present the same type of intelligence, centered on the average.

BTW, most Chads are Kshatriya, which explains their general low IQ, while even the most cursory glance at the greatest geniuses in history will show most of them were anything but the type of men liable to attract a lot of females, I.E., feminine looking men whose psychological disposition and physical build was not suited for combat or action of any kind.
 
Last edited:
This makes me want to LDAR. Being perceived as ugly- okay I could deal with that. Being perceived as a dumb fuck- NO. Trying to have a social life is pointless since I am both ugly and unintelligent looking.
Over
 
My midface is super long, but i look (and am) dumb as fuck.
 
fuckkng LOOKS THEORY has got to be one of the most brutal truths ever...period. Every fucking thing we seem to come across can be tied back to looks and not bullshit either or some dopey Alex Jonesish conspiracy theory reach either. fucking sad.
 
Low IQ is the best looking. Just be low IQ theory.
 
Probably a bullshit bluepilled study. You can't tell a woman's intelligence by appearance? Bullshit. While intelligent women are rare, stupid women usually look stupid too just like stupid men.
 
Guy on left = chad bully thug
Guy on right = nerdy jew
 

Similar threads

stranger
Replies
18
Views
777
stranger
stranger
Nordicel94
Replies
4
Views
192
Nordicel94
Nordicel94
Rapistcel
Replies
16
Views
332
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
Stupid Clown
Replies
30
Views
619
AntoCel
A

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top