Stupid Clown
Everything burns
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2022
- Posts
- 27,137
Of course this will never be widespread information because it doesn't fit the gynocentric narrative
Exactly. Instead they'll keep pushing ridiculous narratives such as how most rape isn't punished. (Aka most women haven't been raped and lie about it)Of course this will never be widespread information because it doesn't fit the gynocentric narrative
Yeah it's all so twistedExactly. Instead they'll keep pushing ridiculous narratives such as how most rape isn't punished. (Aka most women haven't been raped and lie about it)
Of course this will never be widespread information because it doesn't fit the gynocentric narrative
Exactly...The worst thing is: feminists will continue throwing the "99% of rape perpetrators are men" statistic around despite the fact that the definition is biased.
Yep, crazy how they suppress the truthOf course this will never be widespread information because it doesn't fit the gynocentric narrative
total feminazi assimilation and elimination
Fairly obvious why they don't do it. They want to sustain the lie that women are the biggest victims of rape and don't rape themselves.Came here to mention this exact statistic (it's from DiMarco if I remember right, I've posted some stuff from him here), pretty weird that nobody has done a per capita breakdown like that before.
oh but women are always the biggest victims!
Thanks for the tag mang, appreciate it and saved@WorthlessSlavicShit @DarkStar
link?Came here to mention this exact statistic (it's from DiMarco if I remember right, I've posted some stuff from him here), pretty weird that nobody has done a per capita breakdown like that before.
Of course this will never be widespread information because it doesn't fit the gynocentric narrative
The comment that pissed me off was from the intentional derailing from the foidministYou are right, wrong column. I take back the 400,000 per year. But even if we just say zero for 12 months, the number for men is sill higher at 1,467,000 to the women's 1,270,000. The men are still 200,000 higher (the prison number is 216,000 not just 200.000). But taking zero for 12 months for men's forcible penetration is also completely unrealistic.
You are correct that the male 400,000 victims as year cannot be derived from the 970,000 lifetime number. The whole confusion arises from the fact that the CDC simply put an asterisk (*) in the column of estimated number of victims for 12 months. Like they didn't want or didn't care to list it because it might be too high. But we know that there are more than 200,000 prison rapes (as per their definition this is all forced penetration) and the overall male population is much larger than the just the male prison inmate population. So the number of victims is likely to be from the male prison population's 200,000 up to who knows what. It could be estimated conservatively that the general population sees twice the number of victims than just the prison population, giving 400,000. I wish the CDC would report properly, but I am afraid they are just not allowed, due to feminist power within it and all other government agencies. In this case, the question is if we can take the 400,000 victims per year as a projection from the 216,000 for just the prison population and the more than 900,000 sexual attacks for just for the male juvenile population. As a replacement for the asterisk the CDC gave us.
Ideally we should dig into this deep with scientifically and statistically validated methods. My expectation would be that the female victim numbers would go down significantly because those numbers tend to be so highly inflated (like "1 in 3 women are raped", and absurdities like that), while the numbers for men would go significantly up with new research, as the numbers we know for male victims are so underreported. The end result could very well be even more skewed numbers, possibly indicating that this society has a bigger rape of men boys problem than a rape of women and girls problem.
It is trying so hard to delegitimize OP. It’s cringeTLDR
But this hotbed of sickness is why these forums always get banned. They get taken over by trolls to the point where there aren’t even any real men complaining, just bots and women larping.
She basically restated her position that the OP already debunkedI’m sorry that making up that more men are raped than women isn’t recognised in any mainstream study or news or anything and it’s acknowledged everywhere that women are raped much more than men. I’m sorry that women going to college more than men has been going on since the early 2000s and it’s never translated to women making more than men at any point other than early 20s which shows men just take a while to build up towards a prestige job in the prestige field they’re in compared to women who earn most of what they’ll earn in lower paid jobs from the get go, so that as men start progressing up the ranks, they quickly power past women and don’t look back. And I’m sorry that affirmative action, in both the gender and racial sense, is almost certain to be reversed by the Supreme Court in the next few years, with race based affirmative action overturning coming as soon as next year. That should reverse some of that 55/60 - 45/40 gap. But the gap doesn’t mean much technically anyways since it’s existed for ages and men still dominate all the high paying, prestige fields while women have barely moved their percentages within them.
Incels are raped by life every second of the day. Nothing is worse than that.
total feminazi elimination
These feminists never provide their own statistics. It's always how they feel. Feminists are illogical. The only reason they're taken seriously is because they have a vagina.The dude seems to have acknowledged that he made a mistake in this comment (that no one replied to):
The comment that pissed me off was from the intentional derailing from the foidminist
It is trying so hard to delegitimize OP. It’s cringe
She basically restated her position that the OP already debunked
Of course this will never be widespread information because it doesn't fit the gynocentric narrative