Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Men are our true enemies.

Looksmaxxcel

Looksmaxxcel

Captain
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Posts
1,596
Literally every single problem that we are dealing with is the direct result of men enabling women or throwing other men under the bus for a crumb of female validation. Men artificially enable a matriarchal society and create an extreme level of hypergamy that does not exist in nature, and it's our own gender's fault that we're suffering. Therefore, if you want to fix society, we need to purge all of the men who espouse and support female empowerment.
 
Cucks are our true enemies*
 
Cucks and soyboys are our true enemies*
 
To an extent. We had the muzzle on female nature up until very recently, so you can blame the international jew for taking said muzzle off
 
All living things are my enemies. I've tried to stay away from human cunts to avoid problems but there's always some piece of shit trying to fuck with me ffs I can't even spend a single day without getting attacked by mosquitoes, ants, mites, bacteria, I have to shower daily to kill microorganisms tryina feed on my body n shit, maaaan FUCK LIVING THANGS!
 
Cucks may be the enemy, but its the women that we have to be put back in their place. Men may be the enablers, but if we get women back to where they were and teach men to never make the same mistake again, we'll solve the problem.
 
Not necessarily our fault but yes other men have fucked us over completely they invent things to make the lies of women easier and in return it hurts the average male.
 
The average man seems to exhibit cuck behavior, unfortunately. There would have to be a massive purging if we want to get anything done.
...in minecraft of course
 
Literally every single problem that we are dealing with is the direct result of men enabling women or throwing other men under the bus for a crumb of female validation. Men artificially enable a matriarchal society and create an extreme level of hypergamy that does not exist in nature, and it's our own gender's fault that we're suffering. Therefore, if you want to fix society, we need to purge all of the men who espouse and support female empowerment.
I agree, simps are the true villains because they boost womens ego so much.
 
Indeed cucked men are worse than women. they are traitors
imagine unironically supporting a female over your fellow brethren.
 
Wrong. WHITE Anglo-Judeo males are responsible for this mess. They love strong empowered women. From Chad tier white males all the way to low tiered incels (as evident on this forum).

The Anglosphere is rapidly descending into the abyss though. So there is some hope that things will eventually get better with their numbers dwindled significantly.
 
life itself is just hyper-competitive and highly selective, pretty much everyone and everything is our enemy.
 
Wrong. WHITE Anglo-Judeo males are responsible for this mess. They love strong empowered women. From Chad tier white males all the way to low tiered incels (as evident on this forum).

The Anglosphere is rapidly descending into the abyss though. So there is some hope that things will eventually get better with their numbers dwindled significantly.

It's the 'white' man, particularly the 'white Anglo' man who enabled, supported, promoted, and spread feminism, liberalism and societal gynocentricism. Matriarchal rulership is a largely responsible for the societal/cultural decay and degeneration we are experiencing- the woman is morally weak, easily corruptible, they are agents of chaos, they have no honor, and they have no willingness to sacrifice for tribe and country. The western world and the US are indeed in an ongoing and irreversible downfall, a downfall that has taken many decades, a downfall for which they blame the "Jooz", the "Marxists", or any other semi- mythical bogeyman they can conjure up. It's bad enough to fall, but apparently far more terrible to admit it...
 
To an extent. We had the muzzle on female nature up until very recently, so you can blame the international jew for taking said muzzle off
The international white countries for leading women's rights and faggotry*
 
The international white countries for leading women's rights and faggotry*
>Implying it wasn't every race that had a fringe group of feminists
All jews did was amplify the extremists of the time period.

Islam had the biggest female theocratic/mystic

There's also
Huda Shaarawi who was a famous feminist who was anti British in Egypt.
1607052466241


Arabs just didn't really matter politically or economically enough by the time globalist power was achieved for their fringe groups to be blown up so there was no point.
 
>Implying it wasn't every race that had a fringe group of feminists
All jews did was amplify the extremists of the time period.

Islam had the biggest female theocratic/mystic

There's also
Huda Shaarawi who was a famous feminist who was anti British in Egypt.
View attachment 380580

Arabs just didn't really matter politically or economically enough by the time globalist power was achieved for their fringe groups to be blown up so there was no point.
It seems like you're going to a lot of lengths not to admit that modern day female rights and globohomo came from white countries.

Every country had feminists, only certain countries empowered them. The cuck ones
 
This actually your mothers that bluepill the shit out of men. If you notice cuckcels will never admit their mothers are whores. Your mother is the first person in your life to bluepill the shit out of you, even before ((educators)). This is why men don't see their ungainliness and disposablility, your mothers call you handsome.
 
It seems like you're going to a lot of lengths not to admit that modern day female rights and globohomo came from white countries.

Every country had feminists, only certain countries empowered them. The cuck ones
looking up the hundreds of arab and islamic feminists isn't "going to great lengths". Infact in the medieval era women in the middle east had more "rights" than the women in Europe.
Ignaz Goldziher predicted himself that perhaps as much as 15% of medieval hadith scholars were women. Ruth Roded writes that
"In reading the biographies of thousands of Muslim women scholars, one is amazed at the evidence that contradicts the view of Muslim women as marginal, secluded, and restricted". Marriage was also giga cucked for the arabs.


Women were able to manage their financial affairs privately and separately from their husbands, and contract divorces. They could also grant inheritance and keep their surnames. And this is all under the traditional interpretation of sharia, not just a cherrypicking of examples from the most progressive classes of society.

In 15th century Egypt, a very interesting survey was done of the marital history of 500 women, in which about a third of women married more than once, many because they had completed a divorce.

This, for many many years in Europe, would have been unheard of. French laws didn’t remove restrictions like this until 1965, and significant problems arose in the Middle Eastern areas controlled by the British Empire, where the institution of common law stripped many women of their wealth and removed their legal identity entirely.

Europeans only surpassed arabs after 1945 with (((())). Before that the Arabs were more cucked infinitely. Unlike Islamic feminism, European feminism was Jews and Whites. Arab/Islamic feminism was entirely arab
 
looking up the hundreds of arab and islamic feminists isn't "going to great lengths". Infact in the medieval era women in the middle east had more "rights" than the women in Europe.
Ignaz Goldziher predicted himself that perhaps as much as 15% of medieval hadith scholars were women. Ruth Roded writes that
"In reading the biographies of thousands of Muslim women scholars, one is amazed at the evidence that contradicts the view of Muslim women as marginal, secluded, and restricted". Marriage was also giga cucked for the arabs.


Women were able to manage their financial affairs privately and separately from their husbands, and contract divorces. They could also grant inheritance and keep their surnames. And this is all under the traditional interpretation of sharia, not just a cherrypicking of examples from the most progressive classes of society.

In 15th century Egypt, a very interesting survey was done of the marital history of 500 women, in which about a third of women married more than once, many because they had completed a divorce.

This, for many many years in Europe, would have been unheard of. French laws didn’t remove restrictions like this until 1965, and significant problems arose in the Middle Eastern areas controlled by the British Empire, where the institution of common law stripped many women of their wealth and removed their legal identity entirely.

Europeans only surpassed arabs after 1945 with (((())). Before that the Arabs were more cucked infinitely. Unlike Islamic feminism, European feminism was Jews and Whites. Arab/Islamic feminism was entirely arab
What are you rambling about man? The countries that gave modern women their rights and empowered globohomo are white countries. And they are the ones that enforce it worldwide. That's literally it.
 
What are you rambling about man? The countries that gave modern women their rights and empowered globohomo are white countries. And they are the ones that enforce it worldwide. That's literally it.
Cope..... ALL races are involved..... They wouldn't call it the global "Great Reset" (GLOBALISM) if your people weren't participating too....


Get over it, HUMANITY sold out...... enjoy the coming technocratic New World Order enslavement.....

It's so easy to blame "whitey" for everything...... you know to obfuscate YOUR responsibly to do something about it........
 
Last edited:
Cope..... ALL races are involved..... They wouldn't call it the global "Great Reset" (GLOBALISM) if your people weren't participating too....


Get over it, HUMANITY sold out...... enjoy the coming technocratic New World Order enslavement.....
LOL why are people coping this hard with the simple fact that white countries not only lead women's rights, but enforced it in other countries and shame and attacked them when they didn't comply.
 
What are you rambling about man? The countries that gave modern women their rights and empowered globohomo are white countries. And they are the ones that enforce it worldwide. That's literally it.
You refuse to argue in good faith. JFL. That's ok though because this stuff is thread worthy anyway.

>The countries that gave women their rights
were firstly arab countries in the middle ages and up until 1945. It has never been a "Whitey exportin duh feminism" until 80 years ago. When you realize that most of the feminists were jews... and the Cordoba Caliphate in the 1100's sheltered jews from European persecution...Then things start to click. You want to know the first real "feminist" leader of modern history (after 1920)? Ataturk. Ataturk wasn't white. Again, Arabs did not hold enough power or political significance for jews to care about empowering the fringe groups (feminists, communists, etc.)
 
Last edited:
LOL why are people coping this hard with the simple fact that white countries not only lead women's rights, but enforced it in other countries and shame and attacked them when they didn't comply.
Always remember the golden rule.

Nothing is ever whiteys fault. When in doubt. Blame jews

The original dindus

20200805 144022
 
You refuse to argue in good faith. JFL. That's ok though because this stuff is thread worthy anyway.

>The countries that gave women their rights
were firstly arab countries in the middle ages and up until after 1945. It has never been a "Whitey exportin duh feminism" until 80 years ago. When you realize that most of the feminists were jews... and the Cordoba Caliphate in the 1100's sheltered jews from European persecution...Then things start to click. You want to know the first real "feminist" leader of modern history? Ataturk. Ataturk wasn't white.
I'm the one who refuses to argue in good faith, but you're talking about the middle ages?

The point is simple. Modern culture and women's rights were lead and enforced by white countries. End of story. That's literally just a fact. The only thing in bad faith is you running around it.
The original dindus
:lul:
 
LOL why are people coping this hard with the simple fact that white countries not only lead women's rights, but enforced it in other countries and shame and attacked them when they didn't comply.
As if no other countries are matriarchal based JFL!!! the entire worlds people are cucks for the most part.... Islamic countries are pretty much the only ones not now adays. Are you a Muslim? in a Arabic country? if not, you have NO bases to complain about damn "whitey"

Divide and conquered..... you earned your global enslavement humanity.... now stfu and get your vaccines... please.
You refuse to argue in good faith. JFL. That's ok though because this stuff is thread worthy anyway.

>The countries that gave women their rights
were firstly arab countries in the middle ages and up until 1945. It has never been a "Whitey exportin duh feminism" until 80 years ago. When you realize that most of the feminists were jews... and the Cordoba Caliphate in the 1100's sheltered jews from European persecution...Then things start to click. You want to know the first real "feminist" leader of modern history (after 1920)? Ataturk. Ataturk wasn't white. Again, Arabs did not hold enough power or political significance for jews to care about empowering the fringe groups (feminists, communists, etc.)
Interesting.
I'm the one who refuses to argue in good faith, but you're talking about the middle ages?

The point is simple. Modern culture and women's rights were lead and enforced by white countries. End of story. That's literally just a fact. The only thing in bad faith is you running around it.

:lul:
Did the TV tell you to hate "whitey"?
 
Last edited:
I'm the one who refuses to argue in good faith, but you're talking about the middle ages?
because things before the event matter. If an event results in something to happen, the event is relevant to the result.
If jews empowered white fringe groups to push feminism

And the cordoba caliphate (and the ottoman empire later) stopped Jews from being entirely exterminated in the middle ages by Europeans

Then the blame cannot be placed purely on Europeans. The event is Arabs sheltering the future pushers of feminism, the result is the people the future pushers of feminism attack adopting feminism.
The point is simple. Modern culture and women's rights were lead and enforced by white countries. End of story. That's literally just a fact. The only thing in bad faith is you running around it.
The ideological tenants of these white countries came from jews who ran away to arab countries long ago. if I try beating the shit out of a dog for attacking me, and you take the dog in, then the dog comes back out and attacks me again, who's the one at fault for not letting me beat the shit out of the dog?
 
Last edited:
because things before the event matter. If an event results in something to happen, the event is relevant to the result.
If jews empowered white fringe groups to push feminism

And the cordoba caliphate (and the ottoman empire later) stopped Jews from being entirely exterminated in the middle ages by Europeans

Then the blame cannot be placed purely on Europeans. The event is Arabs sheltering the future pushers of feminism, the result is the people the future pushers of feminism attack adopting feminism.

The ideological tenants of these white countries came from jews who ran away to arab countries long ago. if I try beating the shit out of a dog for attacking me, and you take the dog in, then the dog comes back out and attacks me again, who's the one at fault for not letting me beat the shit out of the dog?
What is this essay you're writing have to do with I'm talking about? What does it have to do with literally the simple fact that white countries pushed and lead women's rights today? Nothing you say will change that. "jewish feminsits" yeah so? white countries are still the ones that gave women rights.
 
It's quite pathetic, isn't it?
Have you even researched anything? This global take over is more than just the Zionists.... though they're major players, you got the U.N, British royals, Romes, Vatican..... and more... IT IS ALL IN YOUR FACE IN THE OPEN......


Extra-samsaric, why participate in race divide? judging by your name i thought you'd know better.....

You know "whitey" has the SAME divine spark as you right?

No one ever looks at it but here's a U.N game plan Agenda 2030/...... where it CLEARLY says on 5. "empower all women and girls"....



"Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.............................................................."

I love how peasants argue amongst ourselves while our masters dominate us in every way....... smoooth......
 
Last edited:
What is this essay you're writing have to do with I'm talking about? What does it have to do with literally the simple fact that white countries pushed and lead women's rights today? Nothing you say will change that. "jewish feminsits" yeah so? white countries are still the ones that gave women rights.
yep, refusing to argue in good faith.

>White countries pushed and lead womens right's

also arab countries "gave womens" rights first in the medieval era but we've already established that.

the people that did that were saved by Arabs. I'm not disputing the fact that the west did do that, but the people in the west that did that were originally taken in by Arabs, because the west tried to exterminate them. The people pushing feminism were saved by Arabs when Europeans tried exterminating them.


Interesting.
You can see you know they're wrong. They don't care about the truth though, they care about winning the argument. I mean you see it in how these people insult pad and refuse to cite sources and just sperg out. I mean there's a reason jewish people like to talk about "islamophobia" and how we need to let in muslim migrants. It's because they got their ass saved by Arabs.
 
Vatican bankroll Hitler germany.
U.S.A. push women out of domestic role to help bring the men home faster.
Time 2 pay the pied piper when many refused to go back to domestic role over the years.
Then they made banks with trillions of Chad 'seeds.
Babies are made with these back in late 60s or 70s.
Who need men anymore?
May be good as eunuch worker drones.

The enemies are ,drum roll, the ruling class.
 
Last edited:
You can see you know they're wrong. They don't care about the truth though, they care about winning the argument. I mean you see it in how these people insult pad and refuse to cite sources and just sperg out. I mean there's a reason jewish people like to talk about "islamophobia" and how we need to let in muslim migrants. It's because they got their ass saved by Arabs.
Exactly.
 
anythang to beat duh crakka who dun took me ova n shiiet an duh TV tol me wuz bad.

I assume the hate boner comes from modern media and TV while also being from historical grievances (we took them over).
 
yep, refusing to argue in good faith.

>White countries pushed and lead womens right's

the people that did that were saved by Arabs. I'm not disputing the fact that the west did do that, but the people in the west that did that were originally taken in by Arabs, because the west tried to exterminate them. The people pushing feminism were saved by Arabs when Europeans tried exterminating them.



You can see you know they're wrong. They don't care about the truth though, they care about winning the argument. I mean you see it in how these people insult pad and refuse to cite sources and just sperg out. I mean there's a reason jewish people like to talk about "islamophobia" and how we need to let in muslim migrants. It's because they got their ass saved by Arabs.
You know damn well you're in the wrong. That's why you literally have to write essays to respond to the simple fact that "white countries lead women's rights and globohomo". Literally end of story.
Imagine thinking arabs can save anyone. Save them from what even? dindu nuffin boss. we wuzz good boys!
anythang to beat duh crakka who dun took me ova n shiiet an duh TV tol me wuz bad.

I assume the hate boner comes from modern media and TV while also being from historical grievances (we took them over).
Modern media tells us women's rights and globohomo are good tho. White countries media
 
anythang to beat duh crakka who dun took me ova n shiiet an duh TV tol me wuz bad.

I assume the hate boner comes from modern media and TV while also being from historical grievances (we took them over).
You're 100% right.... they're falling hook, link, and sinker, for the brainwashing, like 99% of people. fuckers just cant put down their TVs

Muh TV told me "whitey" is bad....

I love how peasants argue amongst ourselves while our masters dominate us in every way....... smoooth......
 
Last edited:
You know damn well you're in the wrong. That's why you literally have to write essays to respond to the simple fact that "white countries lead women's rights and globohomo". Literally end of story.
>You have to write a proper response backed with research and citations, this means you are wrong.
What? That just means I don't wanna write something that's not backed up with proper evidence and citations.
Imagine thinking arabs can save anyone. Save them from what even? dindu nuffin boss. we wuzz good boys!
Save them from when Europeans tried exterminating them. Arabs saved the ancestors of the biggest feminist influencers. You're purposefully inducing tunnel vision because you refuse to admit that your people had a massive role to play in the operation. Obviously white countries who were naive enough to trust jews and non homogenous cultures and peoples and all of that are at fault, but that scenario wouldn't have happened had arabs not saved the people who would eventually be taken in by whites naivety.


Modern media tells us women's rights and globohomo are good tho. White countries media
Owned by who? Owned by the people you saved.
 
>You have to write a proper response backed with research and citations, this means you are wrong.
What? That just means I don't wanna write something that's not backed up with proper evidence and citations.
This is not what a proper response with research is. I know you'll say it's "ad hominem", but you genuinely are incapable conceptualizing simple points. You post completely unrelated shit, that you yourself don't understand which is why I assume you think it's related and you think it's some high IQ shit. If you have to complicate a simple point to argue around it, you're probably already wrong.
Save them from when Europeans tried exterminating them. Arabs saved the ancestors of the biggest feminist influencers. You're purposefully inducing tunnel vision because you refuse to admit that your people had a massive role to play in the operation. Obviously white countries who were naive enough to trust jews and non homogenous cultures and peoples and all of that are at fault, but that scenario wouldn't have happened had arabs not saved the people who were taken in by whites naivety.
jesus christ lol. Bummer, which country gave modern women's rights? Simple question
 
This is not what a proper response with research is. I know you'll say it's "ad hominem", but you genuinely are incapable conceptualizing simple points. You post completely unrelated shit, that you yourself don't understand which is why I assume you think it's related and you think it's some high IQ shit. If you have to complicate a simple point to argue around it, you're probably already wrong.
that is an ad hominem, and yes things are more complicated than black and white. You are complimenting me in this post. Things are not a monolith, different causes create different results, results are the cause of multiple things. In history and politics/philosophy there is no "simple points". Proves to me you are brainwashed by modern society when you think history is a "simple point" because that's what they want you to believe.
jesus christ lol. Bummer, which country gave modern women's rights? Simple question
nations are not a monolith. National politics are not a monolith. People pushed women's rights, and those people were the descendants of refugees fleeing from Europe and going into the Cordoba caliphate and the Ottoman empire.

Also muslim countries were the first to give rights to women, look up in the SOURCED post I made about the Islamic feminists.
 
that is an ad hominem, and yes things are more complicated than black and white. You are complimenting me in this post. Things are not a monolith, different causes create different results, results are the cause of multiple things. In history and politics/philosophy there is no "simple points". Proves to me you are brainwashed by modern society when you think history is a "simple point" because that's what they want you to believe.

nations are not a monolith. National politics are not a monolith. People pushed women's rights, and those people were the descendants of refugees fleeing from Europe and going into the Cordoba caliphate and the Ottoman empire.

Also muslim countries were the first to give rights to women, look up in the SOURCED post I made about the Islamic feminists.
Bummer, which countries gave modern women their rights?
 
Bummer, which countries gave modern women their rights?
Which people gave modern women their rights? And which people took the people who gave modern women their rights in? This isn't complicated. I mean if you want to get more complicated we could go into early civilizations and theocracy. All this does is literally just slightly expand your massive tunnel vision


because things before the event matter. If an event results in something to happen, the event is relevant to the result.
If jews empowered white fringe groups to push feminism

And the cordoba caliphate (and the ottoman empire later) stopped Jews from being entirely exterminated in the middle ages by Europeans

Then the blame cannot be placed purely on Europeans. The event is Arabs sheltering the future pushers of feminism, the result is the people the future pushers of feminism attack adopting feminism.

The ideological tenants of these white countries came from jews who ran away to arab countries long ago. if I try beating the shit out of a dog for attacking me, and you take the dog in, then the dog comes back out and attacks me again, who's the one at fault for not letting me beat the shit out of the dog?
 
Which people gave modern women their rights? And which people took the people who gave modern women their rights in? This isn't complicated. I mean if you want to get more complicated we could go into early civilizations and theocracy. All this does is literally just slightly expand your massive tunnel vision
Bummer, which countries gave modern rights to women? Are you gonna answer or should I just mark it as another big brain bummer moment?
 

Similar threads

Just say NIGGER!
Replies
17
Views
1K
Just say NIGGER!
Just say NIGGER!
WeirdPanda
Replies
19
Views
2K
autistandugly
autistandugly
Nihilistic Lowlife
Replies
22
Views
1K
Friezacel
Friezacel
tulasdanslos
Replies
16
Views
633
sk.feelsdevil
sk.feelsdevil
wereq.feelsdevil
Replies
18
Views
965
Failed Pullout
Failed Pullout

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top