Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

TeeHee Men are not all meant to reproduce or access women

Lv99_BixNood

Lv99_BixNood

fascel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Posts
19,351

View: https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1h9q5io/just_to_let_yall_know_sex_workers_are_among_you/m13frfc/


Feminism started getting promoted as women being free of religious purity culture instead of what it actually always was. Women being free to control reproduction like they do in nature. Men are not all meant to reproduce or access women. Capitalism is inherently patriarchal and needs women commodified and constantly reproducing on the terms of the elites.

B-But feminism means gender equality :foidSoy:
 
Okay in nature sub5 males reproduce by rape.

How come they get to pick and choose benefits society grants them?
 
Okay in nature sub5 males reproduce by rape.

How come they get to pick and choose benefits society grants them?
Because they can, they're coddled by society saying they can do no wrong. Even in a hypothetic war or uprising, they all will be hiding while all the men would be killing each other for them. Men are slaves of their rotten, pus-ridden roast.
 
Yeah okay so basically everything is patriarchy boyos. :feelskek: Wanna be a whore ? Patriarchy. :foidSoy: Must be chaste ? Patriarchy. :foidSoy: Bunch of schizo, convoluted mental gymnastics that even feminists don't agree on because they had this debate for a long time now about whether "sex work" is empowering or not. Really makes you think... it's typical of something you'd find in a world full of confusion.

That's how you should come to the conclusion that patriarchy and "purity culture" were about social harmony first and foremost, not about their "reproduction control" or whatever cause those same old values she despises valued celibacy and virginity the most, both for men and women. It was not Marxist Rodgerism : you just couldn't be a hypergamic whore and that's only fair for everyone.

And if men are not meant to access women, then women are even less meant to show off their bodies in public and send fake mating signals without risking a beatdown or being raped. Humanity is not all about your narcissistic, solipsistic foid power trip.

Feminists scumbags of this caliber are just, unironically, shitty human beings. :soy:
 
Last edited:
But this is how they approach society. It's all about being completely superior with no one challenging you ever.
 
This scum wants to be free to despise men without any repercussions.
 
This foid is by far one of the evilest foids i ever saw. Browsing through her account made me feel physically ill.
she doesnt lie - monogamy, tradition, religion - all these are tools to control women so that men could feel love and have sex and kids.
She also doesnt lie about the goal of feminism - to return to the times before culture, before civilization, in which she will have her much cherished "freedom".
Notice the complete lack of morality. The suffering of men means nothing, they are more like insects in her views; or more accurately perhapes dogs (lol) unfit to breed, should be sterilized. In this way she truly does want us to go back to the stone age!
If you whore are reading this, which i doubt, i eant you to know the following - I am a harmless and peaceful man, i have difficulty killing a cockroach. I have never harmed anyone or anything. The same is true for most people here. All we ever wanted was to live a happy life, with love and tenderness. But you, you source of evil, you could give less or a single fuck about that, as in your view we are not human beings, we are not creatures worthy of any empathy or understanding. Foids select according to their reptilian brain, not according to qualities like kindness, intellegence, and so on. Not suprsingly you choose the most barbaric of men as your favourites. May your entire project of destroying civiilization be destroyed! May things go back to the way they were! And ofc, a world run by the likes of you, while itd be more natural, hardly would be morally superior... precisely bec it would be more natural! And i wont except great works of culture and art either...
I am sure you, or some IT fag is thinming this fascsist inkwell... how am i the nazi? When you whore want eugenics... call me a nazi, ironically this forum has more diversity than your Xhomosome nonsense or whatever, im literally a shitskin jew!
Fuck foids mang :feelskek: :feelsLightsaber:
 
I only made it halfway through.

“…abolish patriarchy”

This is hilarious because the species is - to use women’s new favorite word - InHeReNtLy patriarchal by virtue of men being stronger, more aggressive and comprising all the killers of the species, by a factor of several magnitudes. Women’s status in society absolutley requires the consent of men, but the reverse of that is not true. Because push come to shove, men always win, because only we naturally have teeth and claws and can FORCE our will into existence. Women can only threaten to withhold sex, but usually can’t hold out longer than a few weeks lol.

It’s always hilarious that they talk about smashing patriarchy. Has the possibility of male pushback never crossed their minds? How will they counter this? by voooting and proootesting? Their vote is guaranteed (for now) by men with guns, and protests only work if the powers that be support them (in which case they’re redundant) or if threats are made (if violent, the state shuts you down, if economic, this is the narrow band in which protest works). So they have no real recourse if the men get angry and say “enough of this, back to the kitchen you go, barefoot and pregnant”

“Might is right” is anathema to the feminist worldview. Really anything to do with determinism. I think most people recoil away from this. It’s almost like threatening to unravel one’s religion, and all the implications of it.
 
Women have the jobs they do now because simps give them the jobs. They're a net negative and they're currently leaching off male tax dollars and work. They did not earn their freedoms off hard work. No, they're simply latching off of men and pretending that they did it. They'd be nothing without men.

Furthermore rape is indeed natural and healthy. The neanderthals raped the homosapiens and in doing so gave us many beneficial traits such as a greater resistance to cold. Species that do not rape and completely rely on sexual selection such as the Irish elk completely go extinct because the females are picky. Meanwhile species like the Mallard duck survive

I only made it halfway through.

“…abolish patriarchy”

This is hilarious because the species is - to use women’s new favorite word - InHeReNtLy patriarchal by virtue of men being stronger, more aggressive and comprising all the killers of the species, by a factor of several magnitudes. Women’s status in society absolutley requires the consent of men, but the reverse of that is not true. Because push come to shove, men always win, because only we naturally have teeth and claws and can FORCE our will into existence. Women can only threaten to withhold sex, but usually can’t hold out longer than a few weeks lol.

It’s always hilarious that they talk about smashing patriarchy. Has the possibility of male pushback never crossed their minds? How will they counter this? by voooting and proootesting? Their vote is guaranteed (for now) by men with guns, and protests only work if the powers that be support them (in which case they’re redundant) or if threats are made (if violent, the state shuts you down, if economic, this is the narrow band in which protest works). So they have no real recourse if the men get angry and say “enough of this, back to the kitchen you go, barefoot and pregnant”

“Might is right” is anathema to the feminist worldview. Really anything to do with determinism. I think most people recoil away from this. It’s almost like threatening to unravel one’s religion, and all the implications of it.
Exactly
 

Fuck foids but I hope they keep on saying the patriarchy made dating easier for men. It's the best blackpill, the one that reveals how under a feminist system, men always lose. The Equal Credit Act made it so that women were no longer dependent on men, and look at what happened.

" They made patriarchal religion and marriage concepts to ensure that women are tied to a single man and that every man gets access. They use shame to get women to lower their standards in choosing mates. All about access. If they have access, they win."

The reason why women weren't allowed to be sexual selectors is chiefly because of the 80/20 rule. Men are humble, and view most women as attractive. Once the patriarchy lost power most unattractive men lost.

Things WERE better back then, and if normies can see that, then the first step is complete.
 
Last edited:
Look at what is happening when the patriarchy shifts in favor of foids. young men are dropping out of the workforce or not seeking education at record numbers, birth rates are falling, suicide rates are skyrocketing. Toilets are evil fucking demons
 
Attractive women already dominate and control reproduction, this foid and other internet feminists are just mad because unattractive ones like them don't have the same power to choose:feelskek::feelskek:.

Next, I computed the distribution of observed and expected father-partner eye colour pairs in the same two subsamples. In women whose self-assessed attractiveness was below the median (Fig. 3, left panel), partners and fathers never had the same eye colour more often than expected by chance, χ2(9) = 6.609, p = 0.678, N = 226. In women whose self-assessed attractiveness was above the median (Fig. 3, right panel), however, they did, χ2(9) = 31.314, p = 0.0003, N = 251. In particular, the father-partner eye colour combinations blue/blue, green/green, and dark brown/dark brown all occurred significantly more than expected, whereas the combinations green/dark brown and dark brown/blue occurred significantly less than expected. Yet there was no trace of this effect in men’s data: none of the mother-partner same-colour combinations occurred significantly more often than expected, not even in the subsample of men whose self-assessed attractiveness was above the median (see Supplementary Material).


Extreme misandric feminism is cope for both unattractive women and men. Unattractive women desperately cope by believing that it's their gender, not their looks, why they don't have the partners they want, why they aren't rich and successful and so on, and they desperately cope by believing that attractive women have it hard as well. Similarly, unattractive men desperately turn to feminism to believe that women are "oppressed" and "scared of men", to cope with the fact that no women have ever pursued them and or was sexual with them. Believing that women simply don't do that with any guys because of the patriarchy is a viable cope if you manage to convince yourself of it.

Plus, they are often just psychopathic.


@reveries @DarkStar
 
This foid is by far one of the evilest foids i ever saw. Browsing through her account made me feel physically ill.
she doesnt lie - monogamy, tradition, religion - all these are tools to control women so that men could feel love and have sex and kids.
She also doesnt lie about the goal of feminism - to return to the times before culture, before civilization, in which she will have her much cherished "freedom".
Notice the complete lack of morality. The suffering of men means nothing, they are more like insects in her views; or more accurately perhapes dogs (lol) unfit to breed, should be sterilized. In this way she truly does want us to go back to the stone age!
If you whore are reading this, which i doubt, i eant you to know the following - I am a harmless and peaceful man, i have difficulty killing a cockroach. I have never harmed anyone or anything. The same is true for most people here. All we ever wanted was to live a happy life, with love and tenderness. But you, you source of evil, you could give less or a single fuck about that, as in your view we are not human beings, we are not creatures worthy of any empathy or understanding. Foids select according to their reptilian brain, not according to qualities like kindness, intellegence, and so on. Not suprsingly you choose the most barbaric of men as your favourites. May your entire project of destroying civiilization be destroyed! May things go back to the way they were! And ofc, a world run by the likes of you, while itd be more natural, hardly would be morally superior... precisely bec it would be more natural! And i wont except great works of culture and art either...
I am sure you, or some IT fag is thinming this fascsist inkwell... how am i the nazi? When you whore want eugenics... call me a nazi, ironically this forum has more diversity than your Xhomosome nonsense or whatever, im literally a shitskin jew!
Fuck foids mang :feelskek: :feelsLightsaber:
Here is some lifefuel if you need:


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1gmbfkg/this_election_has_broken_something_inside_me_and/
 
she doesnt lie - monogamy, tradition, religion - all these are tools to control women so that men could feel love and have sex and kids.
No don't give into their frame. It's just a byproduct of a sane society that's all, and found accross all civilized societies whether influenced by abrahamic religions or not. Men are not supposed to rot and kill themselves by default just cause they don't look super good, are not tall or didn't insanely compete. If anything, it's them that are extremely unnatural, even more so as their standards stem from bad character traits like extreme pride, sexism, arrogance and entitlement. And in the age of feminism and social media/dating apps it's through the roof.
 
Last edited:
This foid is by far one of the evilest foids i ever saw. Browsing through her account made me feel physically ill.
Lmao i did the exact same thing yesterday but for an another account. Was objective and kept and open mind and their arguments don't convince me for shit. They are arbitrary and hostile to men, that's it.
 
Not that I care, but no society or civilization would exist without patriarchy.
 
No don't give into their frame. It's just a byproduct of a sane society that's all, and found accross all civilized societies whether influenced by abrahamic religions or not. Men are not supposed to rot and kill themselves by default just cause they don't look super good, are not tall or didn't insanely compete. If anything, it's them that are extremely unnatural, even more so as their standards stem from bad character traits like extreme pride, sexism, arrogance and entitlement. And in the age of feminism and social media/dating apps it's through the roof.
ofc brothER, see how i said what she wants is a perversion of civilization, a return to the state of a chimp or a gorilla. And yes, she is a completely amoral and sick creature, as most of her likes are. and yea the abrahamic religion thing is massive cope, every culture that isnt hunter gatherer knows how to manage sexual relationships in a moral and egaliterian way.
 
Lmao i did the exact same thing yesterday but for an another account. Was objective and kept and open mind and their arguments don't convince me for shit. They are arbitrary and hostile to men, that's it.
lol, true. she has everything she could want (at least on the social plane) but spits venom and evil out of her mouth. fuck foids brocel :panties: :feelsYall: :feelsaww:
 
What about Viking raids ? or venturing Exploring sailors in the Wild Wild Sea of Dragons ???

blue planet oceans GIF by BBC America
hat tip waiting on mary GIF by Comedy Dynamics
 
They are arbitrary and hostile to men, that's it.
Btw one final thing that convinced me of it is that in some post, she talked about her grandfather/grandmother.

It was a trad relationship with the man working and the woman staying at home. Her grandfather was a positive figure in her eyes in the sense that he treated her grandma well/worked/build a house etc. (A lot of men did just that back in the day he was no exception). Then the grandma at some point wanted to work, which the grandfather initially opposed cause it made him feel useless and emasculated. But then he reluctantly accepted it before the stubbornness of his wife.

And you know what was her conclusion from all of this ? Basically "My grandaddy was a great man, but all the rest are scum."

That's it. No further reflexion on it, she simply spat at the men that wanted to return to such a model by arbitrary decreeting that they're shit and claiming that her grandpa would've hated them when, in fact, men of the last generations don't even get to prove themselves and live in completely emasculated, male hostile societies that could probably make her grandpa into an incel/mgtow, judging how he reacted at the prospect of his wife simply working even after decades of marriage.

But that's the extent of her empathy. Grandaddy good but rest of men bad. We're just supposed to worship women ten times worse than her grandma while being shat on and emasculated.
 
Last edited:
Btw one final thing that convinced me of it is that in some post, she talked about her grandfather/grandmother.

It was a trad relationship with the man working and the woman staying at home. Her grandfather was a positive figure in her eyes in the sense that he treated her grandma well/worked/build a house etc. (A lot of men did just that back in the day he was no exception).
most did. men love their wives and most 50's household, contrary to what they htink, werent abusive but happy and positive.
Then the grandma at some point wanted to work, which the grandfather initially opposed cause it made him feel useless and emasculated. But then he reluctantly accepted it before the stubbornness of his wife.

And you know what was her conclusion from all of this ? Basically "My grandaddy was a great man, but all the rest are scum."

That's it. No further reflexion on it, she simply spat at the men that wanted to return to such a model by arbitrary decreeting that they're shit and claiming that her grandpa would've hated them when, in fact, men of the last generations don't even get to prove themselves and live in completely emasculated, male hostiles societies that could probably make her grandpa into an incel/mgtow, judging how he reacted at the prospect of his wife simply working even after decades of marriage.
true, she doenst think logically but rather makes her emotional feelings into reactions, good chance that if her grandpa lived today and was our age hed be posting here too
 
Women have the jobs they do now because simps give them the jobs. They're a net negative and they're currently leaching off male tax dollars and work. They did not earn their freedoms off hard work. No, they're simply latching off of men and pretending that they did it. They'd be nothing without men.

Furthermore rape is indeed natural and healthy. The neanderthals raped the homosapiens and in doing so gave us many beneficial traits such as a greater resistance to cold. Species that do not rape and completely rely on sexual selection such as the Irish elk completely go extinct because the females are picky. Meanwhile species like the Mallard duck survive


Exactly
The actual Science.
 
most did. men love their wives and most 50's household, contrary to what they htink, werent abusive but happy and positive.

true, she doenst think logically but rather makes her emotional feelings into reactions, good chance that if her grandpa lived today and was our age hed be posting here too
Exactly, complete lack of understanding, they just don't care.

ofc brothER, see how i said what she wants is a perversion of civilization, a return to the state of a chimp or a gorilla. And yes, she is a completely amoral and sick creature, as most of her likes are. and yea the abrahamic religion thing is massive cope, every culture that isnt hunter gatherer knows how to manage sexual relationships in a moral and egaliterian way.
Yeah you're right generally but as i said don't give into their frame that everything is supposedly specifically, malignantly designed to muh control them or something cause that's not true and it feeds their undeserved victim complex.
 
This foid is by far one of the evilest foids i ever saw. Browsing through her account made me feel physically ill.
she doesnt lie - monogamy, tradition, religion - all these are tools to control women so that men could feel love and have sex and kids.
She also doesnt lie about the goal of feminism - to return to the times before culture, before civilization, in which she will have her much cherished "freedom".
Notice the complete lack of morality. The suffering of men means nothing, they are more like insects in her views; or more accurately perhapes dogs (lol) unfit to breed, should be sterilized. In this way she truly does want us to go back to the stone age!
If you whore are reading this, which i doubt, i eant you to know the following - I am a harmless and peaceful man, i have difficulty killing a cockroach. I have never harmed anyone or anything. The same is true for most people here. All we ever wanted was to live a happy life, with love and tenderness. But you, you source of evil, you could give less or a single fuck about that, as in your view we are not human beings, we are not creatures worthy of any empathy or understanding. Foids select according to their reptilian brain, not according to qualities like kindness, intellegence, and so on. Not suprsingly you choose the most barbaric of men as your favourites. May your entire project of destroying civiilization be destroyed! May things go back to the way they were! And ofc, a world run by the likes of you, while itd be more natural, hardly would be morally superior... precisely bec it would be more natural! And i wont except great works of culture and art either...
I am sure you, or some IT fag is thinming this fascsist inkwell... how am i the nazi? When you whore want eugenics... call me a nazi, ironically this forum has more diversity than your Xhomosome nonsense or whatever, im literally a shitskin jew!
Fuck foids mang :feelskek: :feelsLightsaber:
TruER words Hath not Been Spoken!!
For He, who wrestles Against the worldly
Shalt find Nobility in Thyself.
 
Yeah you're right generally but as i said don't give into their frame that everything is supposedly specifically, malignantly designed to muh control them or something cause that's not true and it feeds their undeserved victim complex.
also true. i dont think men in agricultural socities just woke up and were like "yeah lets divide foids in between us" this was a natural developement, after all we were always stronger and more civilized than them
 
also true. i dont think men in agricultural socities just woke up and were like "yeah lets divide foids in between us" this was a natural developement, after all we were always stronger and more civilized than them
:yes::feelsokman:
 
I actually made a thread about this appeal to nature fallacy:

 
I actually made a thread about this appeal to nature fallacy:

true. Natural =/= good. ofc this fallacy is also taken advantage of by moronic leftists, but they ar retarded. whatever benefits man is good, whatever fulfills our natural needs is good and traditional societies do both of these in the best way possible
 
she doenst think logically but rather makes her emotional feelings into reactions
Wanted to emphasize this cause it's so true. The way she was depicting men in general, especially insisting on their supposed bad hygiene and inability to keep a house clean was, again, completely arbitrary. Which got even more insulting after her post history revealed that her boyfriend was a stinky, jobless alcoholic (although she did think about dumping him with a cold premeditation).

Meanwhile i'm the cleanest motherfucker and work a tough job without consuming any substances despite having zero social support. But being ugly, poor and not normie minded condemns me to loneliness.

Browsing those posts was a very enlightening experience tbh. Men in the past didn't know how lucky they were. This zeitgeist sucks so much.
 
Extreme misandric feminism is cope for both unattractive women and men. Unattractive women desperately cope by believing that it's their gender, not their looks, why they don't have the partners they want, why they aren't rich and successful and so on, and they desperately cope by believing that attractive women have it hard as well. Similarly, unattractive men desperately turn to feminism to believe that women are "oppressed" and "scared of men", to cope with the fact that no women have ever pursued them and or was sexual with them. Believing that women simply don't do that with any guys because of the patriarchy is a viable cope if you manage to convince yourself of it.

Plus, they are often just psychopathic.
:bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain: very very high iq observation and very elegantly explains the issue. Also very funny as well :feelskek: humans are so dumb and predictable man.


Plus, they are often just psychopathic.

I remember reading this on MRA's subreddit not so long ago. Wasn't surprising at all. I always felt like the biggest "activists" for whatever's considered a good cause at the moment, were in the fact the biggest UNempathetic psychos and virtue signalers trying to fool the world (and, apparently, themselves) that they are actually good people.
 
Wanted to emphasize this cause it's so true. The way she was depicting men in general, especially insisting on their supposed bad hygiene and inability to keep a house clean was, again, completely arbitrary. Which got even more insulting after her post history revealed that her boyfriend was a stinky, jobless alcoholic (although she did think about dumping him with a cold premeditation).
personality detectors must have failed once again, i wonder if foids can be updated lol
Meanwhile i'm the cleanest motherfucker and work a tough job without consuming any substances despite having zero social support. But being ugly, poor and not normie minded condemns me to loneliness.

Browsing those posts was a very enlightening experience tbh. Men in the past didn't know how lucky they were. This zeitgeist sucks so much.
true, our forefathers had no idea things could get so bad lol
 
I remember reading this on MRA's subreddit not so long ago. Wasn't surprising at all. I always felt like the biggest "activists" for whatever's considered a good cause at the moment, were in the fact the biggest UNempathetic psychos and virtue signalers trying to fool the world (and, apparently, themselves) that they are actually good people.
giga trvth nvke incoming:
I had a guy in HS, incredibley left wing, he left israhell for westoid country. all day he whines about grape, palestine, feminism etc trooned out...
guy was a diagnosed sociopath and enjoyed hurting animals as a kid :lul: :lul:
 
Yet another unsurprising instance of how nobody seems to like leveling the playing field when they're on the winning team, yet champion it when they're on the losing side. Women want to choose whom they shack up with instead of spreading themselves out equally, but the rich should pay more taxes than the poor. Not that most men ain't hypocritical like that.
 
:bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain: very very high iq observation and very elegantly explains the issue. Also very funny as well :feelskek: humans are so dumb and predictable man.

I remember reading this on MRA's subreddit not so long ago. Wasn't surprising at all. I always felt like the biggest "activists" for whatever's considered a good cause at the moment, were in the fact the biggest UNempathetic psychos and virtue signalers trying to fool the world (and, apparently, themselves) that they are actually good people.
Truth:yes::yes:.

giga trvth nvke incoming:
I had a guy in HS, incredibley left wing, he left israhell for westoid country. all day he whines about grape, palestine, feminism etc trooned out...
guy was a diagnosed sociopath and enjoyed hurting animals as a kid :lul: :lul:
Unsurprising:feelshaha::yes:.
 
Attractive women already dominate and control reproduction, this foid and other internet feminists are just mad because unattractive ones like them don't have the same power to choose:feelskek::feelskek:.



Their bitching is the equivalent of a US Congressman in the House bitching he has less power than a Senator

newsflash, both mog the average citizen by a mile.
Extreme misandric feminism is cope for both unattractive women and men. Unattractive women desperately cope by believing that it's their gender, not their looks, why they don't have the partners they want, why they aren't rich and successful and so on, and they desperately cope by believing that attractive women have it hard as well. Similarly, unattractive men desperately turn to feminism to believe that women are "oppressed" and "scared of men", to cope with the fact that no women have ever pursued them and or was sexual with them. Believing that women simply don't do that with any guys because of the patriarchy is a viable cope if you manage to convince yourself of it.

Plus, they are often just psychopathic.


@reveries @DarkStar
I remember that, good thread

Makes sense why two of my cousins are now RadFems. :giga:
 
:bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain: very very high iq observation and very elegantly explains the issue. Also very funny as well :feelskek: humans are so dumb and predictable man.
Yup, feminism is just an excuse for insecure foids to bitch at men & cucks to try & scrape some crumbs of used-up pussy
I remember reading this on MRA's subreddit not so long ago. Wasn't surprising at all. I always felt like the biggest "activists" for whatever's considered a good cause at the moment, were in the fact the biggest UNempathetic psychos and virtue signalers trying to fool the world (and, apparently, themselves) that they are actually good people.
This 100%

It's why even as someone who identifies with the "Far-Right" in a very broad and metaphysical sense, I always treat prominent figures with skepticism. A lot are controlled opposition or simply grifters looking to make some gain from it.

As I say, "everyone wants to be the hero, yet no one wants to slay the dragon"
 
Women always tell on themselves
 
>reading femshit essays

couldn't be me :feelsEhh:
 
Fuck foids but I hope they keep on saying the patriarchy made dating easier for men. It's the best blackpill, the one that reveals how under a feminist system, men always lose. The Equal Credit Act made it so that women were no longer dependent on men, and look at what happened.

" They made patriarchal religion and marriage concepts to ensure that women are tied to a single man and that every man gets access. They use shame to get women to lower their standards in choosing mates. All about access. If they have access, they win."

The reason why women weren't allowed to be sexual selectors is chiefly because of the 80/20 rule. Men are humble, and view most women as attractive. Once the patriarchy lost power most unattractive men lost.

Things WERE better back then, and if normies can see that, then the first step is complete.
>Men are humble, and view most women as attractive

Correction. It’s not to do with humility, it’s to do with eggs possessing innate value. Really the main delineating line for us is “would” vs “would not”. And what “would” means is “yeah these eggs are worth Atleast a couple dozen calories”. Beyond that, we don’t really have the mental infrastructure to CHOOSE between women. We regard most of them as viable mates. The ability to make and intuitively understand what it means to make Mate choice is solely a female phenomenon. Same way zero-sum sexual competition is something only intuitively understood by men - it does not exist among women, because they can always share. It’s why they don’t view men as their sole property, and will defend cheating by saying ‘well it didn’t mean anything”, because they don’t actually mind if a man fucks other women, just aslong as it doesn’t mean anything. They assume we appraise infidelity in the same way.

I suspect women don’t like this introduction to zero-sum sexual competition, as they don’t understand it, and long to go back to a paradigm where women are free to choose who they have sex with , aka all choosing the same guy and living in harems. I think this is the main driving force behind feminism. They want to be submissive inferior sex slaves, but not for Bob in accounting. Only for a worthy Chad who will produce killer sons. Just consider the limit of their sexual desire, and sex being the principal, non-negotiable animating force behind any life form, you would expect that given artificial teeth and claws in the form of voting rights, that give them the ability to alter their environment and forces they’re subject to to their liking, that the changes they’d support would be those that get closest to this limit.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

WorthlessSlavicShit
Replies
20
Views
544
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
Stupid Clown
Replies
39
Views
2K
The Scarlet Prince
The Scarlet Prince
WorthlessSlavicShit
Replies
22
Views
530
WombtoPrisonPlanet
WombtoPrisonPlanet

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top