L
The funny thing is the fact that articles spew that bullshit all the time. They always say men are intimidated by women that are more successful or taller than them - but the truth is actually the opposite: These women want even richer/taller/economically successful men. When you combine these new demands with pre-existing demands (at least in the top percentile of height/frame/etc.) the available dating pool is even smaller.
How many of these "successful" women would give an ordinary worker even a try? Would he even qualify as a human for them if they even saw him? An unironic question at this point, because most women see most men as inherently worthless creatures undeserving of basic respect or any form of emotional proximity. Last but not least: There is no real intimidation factor in women (simply because all power that women have is inherently social and all your money and social power means nothing when someone just decided to go apeshit on you and thereby brings the conflict to a physical level).
But that was off-topic - it is as simple as that: Women want men that mog them.
And as an average (able-bodied/NT/non-deformed) wallflower you mog >80% of men in terms of life quality (hell, even a mentally-ill/wheelchair-bound/deformed woman- so the lowest of the lowest females- still mogs most men in life quality), when you then take "education" (and the resulting hubris), money and better looks into account you easily mog even higher percentages of them so that even less men are in the potential dating pool.
And furthermore, in America there is a good reason for "educated women" often being considered as unmarriable: They bring debts in the thousands with them and mostly studied worthless shit like Kangz studies that gets somebody nowhere in life while having a hubris that is simply unfathomable for someone that fell for a retarded scam (and "Learning for the sake of learning" is a bullshit argument because you could do the same for free, because everyone could visit semilegal online libraries even on the clear web where almost all books are displayed).
How many of these "successful" women would give an ordinary worker even a try? Would he even qualify as a human for them if they even saw him? An unironic question at this point, because most women see most men as inherently worthless creatures undeserving of basic respect or any form of emotional proximity. Last but not least: There is no real intimidation factor in women (simply because all power that women have is inherently social and all your money and social power means nothing when someone just decided to go apeshit on you and thereby brings the conflict to a physical level).
But that was off-topic - it is as simple as that: Women want men that mog them.
And as an average (able-bodied/NT/non-deformed) wallflower you mog >80% of men in terms of life quality (hell, even a mentally-ill/wheelchair-bound/deformed woman- so the lowest of the lowest females- still mogs most men in life quality), when you then take "education" (and the resulting hubris), money and better looks into account you easily mog even higher percentages of them so that even less men are in the potential dating pool.
And furthermore, in America there is a good reason for "educated women" often being considered as unmarriable: They bring debts in the thousands with them and mostly studied worthless shit like Kangz studies that gets somebody nowhere in life while having a hubris that is simply unfathomable for someone that fell for a retarded scam (and "Learning for the sake of learning" is a bullshit argument because you could do the same for free, because everyone could visit semilegal online libraries even on the clear web where almost all books are displayed).
Last edited:
