JFL Men are clingier than foids

[SmhChan]

Link to the original post in lounge.

Women often have stronger platonic bonds, reducing dependency on one partner.

JFL at this politically correct wording. They have more options. Same reason sexually successful men aren't clingy either.

• Men: Taught to suppress emotions, leading to "emotional funneling"—expressing all intimacy needs through a romantic partner.
  • Result: May seem "clingy" when they crave connection but lack other outlets.
• Women: Socialized to be caregivers, often set boundaries against clinginess to avoid appearing "needy."

Because men cannot access foids as easily. You cannot replace romantic/sexual relationships with platonic ones. Foids get that in plenty. Di Caprio and Andrew Tate also set boundaries in their relationships. But you fags get butthurt over it.

Who the fuck doesn't set boundaries in other (non-romantic) relationships. In contrast, actually, foids are much clingier to their kids than men are. Fucking retards.

• In patriarchal societies, men may control partners (mistaken for clinginess), while women’s clinginess is stigmatized as "desperation."
• In egalitarian cultures, these gaps shrink (Fisher, 2017).

Another JFL. Men control partners because of their hypergamy. Nothing to do with clinginess. Also, what is egalitarian? If men gained more social agency with their natural advantage to nullify foids' hypergamy and upper hand in SMV, foids would appear more "desperate." And yes desperate which is akin to an unemployed individual's desperation. It's not romantic clinginess. Nothing is more flattering to men than a clingy foid.

Age: Young men (18–25) show higher clinginess; older men often become more independent.

Older men are more likely to off themselves due to loneliness. Young men get exposed to the SMV inequality at that age range. So that becomes their first response. With age they learn to adapt.

Not "men are clingier," but societal norms shape how clinginess manifests.

So, just their subjective definition.
Nobody's going to address the elephant in the room that is foids's SMV upperhand, just beating around the bush with fucking politically correct phrases like, "setting boundaries", "platonic bonds" etc.

 

[Izayacel]

Man are clingier " because they dont have many options otherwise , if they are given a Girlfriend to begin with

That you shouldnt be emotionally to attached to Woman is another thing , but most Man dont apply it

 

[SmhChan]

Man are clingier " because they dont have many options otherwise , if they are given a Girlfriend to begin with

That you shouldnt be emotionally to attached to Woman is another thing , but most Man dont apply it

Yeah. Men's clinginess is their emotional attachment taken to the extreme because men are no more guaranteed a foid throughout their life. I don't think men were clingy to foids in the past in general.

Their ground for analysis is wrong in the first place because they're never gonna acknowledge how differently men and foids treat relationships. Foids never have a vested romantic interest in a relationship. Of course, men are gonna appear 'clingier' in their eyes.

 

[DreamCoper]

Water is wet?

 

[DreamCoper]

Niggas on this site talk about murdering foids then the next post they’ll be crying their little asses of wishing they had one to hug. That tells you everything you need to know.

 

[SmhChan]

Niggas on this site talk about murdering foids then the next post they’ll be crying their little asses of wishing they had one to hug. That tells you everything you need to know.

That's the biological wiring of the male brain, but I'm not for these reductive statements on the male nature. It's about the social narrative. Like how they are hiding foids' lack of romantic interest in men behind politically correct words.

 

[DreamCoper]

That's the biological wiring of the male brain, but I'm not for these reductive statements on the male nature. It's about the social narrative. Like how they are hiding foids' lack of romantic interest in men behind politically correct words.

Wdym?

 

[SmhChan]

Wdym?

They're constructing the narrative that the clinginess is men's fault for "suppressing emotions" and "not setting boundaries", not acknowledging the other key variables like smv difference, level of romantic interest etc.

 

[reveries]

>Women: Socialized to be caregivers

 

[SmhChan]

>Women: Socialized to be caregivers

Exactly. They are just making up shit as they are going just to not expose foids' absolute lack of interest in men. As a curry, I can tell you, conversely, currywhores who are actually taught to be caregivers (to in-laws, kids and such) in extended families tend to be more devoted to their husbands.